Actually I'm not an AH cheerleader, I'm just not dilluted enough to see these "great" differences between AH and Il2.
playing with no icons is the definition of "realistic" or "historic"
Actually, it's your definition. To me, when I'm playing a game on a 15", 17" or 19" monitor on a very scaled down version of the real world with a complete lack of peripheral vision and depth perception, then icons are necessary to simulate what a real world pilot sees. Making it unnecessarily difficult to acquire visuals on something that can be seen much easer in the real world is the defintion of "difficult" not "historic" or "realistic".
Funny thing though, I recieve update positions on those 400 other players. There's a real war going on all over the map, if I want to, I can fly there and fight.
In Il2, I'm limited to a very small area with a limited number of players and a limited number of targets. It's not quite the same thing, if you see what I mean.
You think that the fantastic graphics from IL-2 is only the difference to AH? No is not there are a lot more. There are many more Players play IL-2 than AH.
Without those graphics, no one would be as intrigued in it as they are right now. Simple truth.
You only know that more people bought the game than people play online AH at any one time. Other than that, you are only assuming more people play Il2 than AH. I never see more than 300 people on hyperlobby, and that's fairly rare. I usually see no more than 100 people.
-SW