Author Topic: Why no HE-111??? (Read 1728 times)

bioconscripter · « **Reply #75 on:** October 05, 2002, 10:37:34 PM »

What about PZL-11 and Pilikarpov I-16? Are those inflatable mockups?

hyena426 · « **Reply #76 on:** October 06, 2002, 02:09:33 PM »

Quote

Anybody with half a brain knows that the HE111 existed only as inflatable mockups . So, do you want inflatable mockups modeled in AH ? DO YOU ? HUH ?

what kinda remark is that? he111 wasnt a joke,it wasnt a inflatable mockup,,lol and i think so!! i would fly it,sure many otheres would too,,you dont have to mock a plane that out lasted every german bomber made, was still in service in 1965,,from 1937 to 1965,,,cant beat that service record ,,it outlasted its hitlers 1,000year rule!! but the stuka should be in here soon i hope:( me163 will be kinda diffrent:)

Samm · « **Reply #77 on:** October 06, 2002, 04:39:08 PM »

Brother if you think the He111 existed as a real bomber then I'm sorry to say you're just a tool of the scale model industry . You've been played .

hyena426 · « **Reply #78 on:** October 07, 2002, 02:01:01 PM »

Quote

Brother if you think the He111 existed as a real bomber then I'm sorry to say you're just a tool of the scale model industry . You've been played

think you been played,i walked in one and seen it fly and took picks of it,,seen it,felt it and smelled it,,,it was real:) and a pretty bomber too,,and if it was a balloon {which it wasnt}the confederate airforce sure fly it good!!