Author Topic: Simple request to HTC (Read 2925 times)

AKS\/\/ulfe · « **Reply #105 on:** December 03, 2002, 06:43:50 PM »

Show me where HiTech answers every thread Hazed. That's exactly the problem, he doesn't, yet you seem to think he owes you something and needs to reply to everyone of your threads or everything regarding LW.

He gave you an explanation of why certain things aren't done, why he doesn't reply to everyone of the threads and then he even went on to explain what would happen even if he did answer you- that being you wouldn't be satisfied.

It's just a neverending cycle, always proposing that something needs fixing then claims that if it weren't LW it would be fixed, then of course the demands to be answered, and when you aren't- you get all huffy- or when you are, you aren't satisfied with it and persist with the issue.

That's the subtle roadkill that you can find in virtually any LW thread. Starts off ok, gains speed and momentum then hits a wall with subtle BS... such as allied planes getting benefits, while LW planes get screwed and other such nonsense.

I've pointed it in those threads before, I have no desire to waste my time typing in search words to find them all... it ain't that hard... just type in "190" and you'll see it... and hell, you did it right here in this thread:

"This thread was a waste of time, undoubtedly for you and others but for several of us it may have opened our eyes to certain attitudes."

People like you, Mandoble, and other "proponents" of LW planes do more harm than good. Sure you bring facts... and are persistent but then you take it to far and the accusations start, the conspiracy theory crops up, and people like Minus post incoherrent rants with absolutely no facts to base them on.

Plenty of times LW fans have been answered, remember the 1 ping engine bug? RAM found it, and it got fixed <- imagine that.

And you still don't get it Hazed, I didn't call anyone in this thread a Luftwhiner (although a few have earned it)... I was referring to that paragraph I quoted. I even stated that in a follow-up post.

The idea was to end this ENDLESS bickering and moaning at people like me who HAPPEN TO LIKE THE 190 and want to see it running the same as the information we find.

Everyone wants to see their preferred plane 100% accurate... it just ain't gonna happen, especially when HTC has to concentrate on hundreds of different aircraft from different countries.

Like I said, why should the LW be so different?

Tumor- you are a hypocrite.
-SW

Swager · « **Reply #106 on:** December 03, 2002, 06:55:26 PM »

I just tried out the turn radius on the Spit V. HTC still has not fixed it!

Going back in now, to once again, test the stall of the Val! It better be fixed!!

Montezuma · « **Reply #107 on:** December 03, 2002, 11:43:56 PM »

I like Fw-190s.

Tumor · « **Reply #108 on:** December 03, 2002, 11:48:49 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by AKS\/\/ulfe

Tumor- you are a hypocrite.
-SW

ROFL! Even better SW. What'd you have to think about that one? Well sticks and stones to you!

hitech · « **Reply #109 on:** December 04, 2002, 08:39:21 AM »

Hazed:

Quote

Jesus, all i wanted was a hint at whether HTC was looking into the 190s.

HiTech:

Quote

We try look into any VALID discussion of flight modling that could be incorect

Hazed:

Quote

The idea was to end this ENDLESS bickering and moaning at people like me who HAPPEN TO LIKE THE 190 and want to see it running the same as the information we find

HiTech:

Quote

And if you realy belive that me answereing your first question would make an issue stop, I belive you are greatly mistaken.

HiTech

Ripsnort · « **Reply #110 on:** December 04, 2002, 08:59:15 AM »

You guys just need to fly more different types of A/C...limiting yourself to one type makes a you dependent thus limiting your abilities...as a famous WB ace used to say:

"There are a million pilots that are excellent in one or two plane types,....there are only a handful of pilots that are excellent in ALL plane types"

Red Tail 444 · « **Reply #111 on:** December 04, 2002, 10:33:44 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Red Tail 444
[B
BTW, don't take this too much to heart, LW's, it's only a game...isint it?
Gainsie [/B]

Well, Hazed, I guess for some, it's not.

You took my post WAY too seriously...no need for profanity, either..

Happy Holidays!

Gainsie

BigGun · « **Reply #112 on:** December 04, 2002, 12:24:33 PM »

Hazed...if you clear your head of the Fog, you can see that HTC has answered your question more than once...you just seem to not like the answer or don't understand it.

MANDOBLE · « **Reply #113 on:** December 04, 2002, 02:07:17 PM »

Hazed, do you remember when 190A5 was introduced in AH? Several people posted here whining about its uberness, and it was tonedown at light speed.

hitech · « **Reply #114 on:** December 04, 2002, 03:09:44 PM »

Ahh good to know the conspiricy theory is alive and well.

Just love how some guys just don't see the hole past the shovel.

HiTech

moot · « **Reply #115 on:** December 04, 2002, 04:39:40 PM »

How to some it's not clear yet that HT & co know there's no other way to "please everyone" but making everything (they release) within their reach perfect and/or unreproachable considering the demands and/or requirements is strange.
Too bad SW is the guy with both luftwhiner in every post and common sense on what HTC can and can't be spilling beans on anything each time it's brought up.

humble · « **Reply #116 on:** December 04, 2002, 05:26:08 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by GRUNHERZ
Hitech but wouldnt that "emergency" be like running for your life, or getting bounced then needing to dogfight so you drop them? Just like somebody would drop a DT or bomb in an "emergency". I see no reason for you to be so extreme on this issue while AH is very relaxed on many loadout options on many airplanes. Why care so much about that issue? Just gives us that option, and why not add a seperate 21cm rocket with the fuze set to detonate on impact for ground attack - just let that be an option in the hangar.

Comments HT?

GRUNHERZ,

Based on what I've read about the german high commands feelings regarding the air war in 1944 you'd really have to have a good reason to jettison those pods. The 190 pilots were under orders to ram once they ran out of ammo if they hadn't seriously damaged there target bomber and ran out of ammo. Amazingly they had about a 50% survival rate. My understanding isthat this policy was in place till about late Nov of 44. To me this is a very valid "gameplay" decision. Based on what I've read the P51 is seriously undermodeled in some ways. I'd say that all attempts are being made to build the various planes out "according to the numbers".

I think the various threads regarding "missing" planes in the set is much more valid. The Ki-84 and P-39 are obvious needs. Like many I'd like to see the P-63 added as well.

As for the depth of the LW plane set, it accurately mirrors what was readily used. Truthfully we should have the spitXIV and the tempest perk free vs the 190D9 and 109G10 if you want to compare things historically. Those were the 4 major combatants in the tactical airwar in Jan 45.

Finally, the G10 is still the toughest nut to crack in the game...truely afighter for the ages.