Originally posted by AKS\/\/ulfe
Kweassa, notice how long I waited to reply to this thread.
Notice how very FEW LW-related threads I post to in the first place Kweassa.
Of course, when it's me who points out who LuftWhiners are (hint: read that paragraph I quoted), you decide to post a sermon on how it's my fault or everyone's out to get the poor LW guys.. or how come I don't post to Karnak's thread or F4UDOA's thread.
Still, I prefer German aircraft over everything else... I just happen to not complain about it.
-SW
oh yeah a real angel you are SW lol
you know full well kweassa has made a valid point in what he said.
Im asking HTC this question so I can lay my questions to rest. I read books on 190s and find every now and then remarks or figures that suggest we have something missing.I post in the hope that it will be looked at and THATS IT! but im called whiner or as HT put it im 'only interested in having a super plane', even the head of the company is accusing me of things.
because im talking about the 190?? could it really be that?
If we dont post info to improve the planes or make em more accurate then what are we doing it for?
HTC chooses not to say if they have taken a look at the 190 with concerns to whats been posted and again we , FANS of a LW plane (god forbid) still dont know if any of the stuff we've found has been looked at or mulled over by HTC.although i guess now it must have been? then again maybe they ignore it as annoying customers they choose to ignore as squeeky wheels?
Well I used to enjoy this forum when we discuss things we find.I remember the 190a8 climbrate discussion we had SW and you posted what you had and i did the same. The thread was a good one and in the end we all agreed the 190a8 seemed to fit BETWEEN the numbers we had and so it was pretty fair if it was averaged by HTC.
BUT over 25k there was a huge gulf between what was in the books and what i found in AH.I actually got fed up timing the climb over 30k in AH because it went into huge times! 3 or 4 times the amount stated in the book i gave reference to (capt.Browns).
So we settled MOST of it but not all. was it ever replied to? no
do we know if the climb rate is right or wrong according to HTC's info? no of course we dont.
all i know is i have a book from an RAF test pilot that says one thing and an AH model that doesnt fit.Still now i dont fly it up to 30k so its all ok right? yeah right thats great!

Same thing with the 190a5 stuff. Loads of theories as to whether the info posted is correct but still no word on what HTC thought of it all. Only from customers who say its all nonsense.
The loadout options for the 190f8 was answered about a year ago by pyro i believe, although i never found the thread, but apparently he said it would be looked into 'time permitting'.
but a year later almost and ive given up on it ever coming.
I just wanted to know what was happening.Im fed up with wondering as im sure loads of others are.It was a simple request but I just got blasted for doing it.
so posting to HTC on LW is just another squeeky wheel to them? without the interest i had in the info /researching/ charts we find here and there etc and then passing it on to post in here I think i'll lose most of the interest in AH i once had.Im severely disapointed by attitudes toward the planes i like.I really wish i loved p51s cause life would be a lot easier.
For me Ive lost a good part of my AH fun now i know this posting by me is all but ignored. really was nice to hear that !
