Pyro's opinion on 3 flight modelling items?

[Citabria]

are these items on a revision list?
if so how far down on the list are they?

1. f6f5 accellerated stall behavior?

2. typhoon Ib rollrate?

3. n1k2 rumored flight model bug?

[hblair]

4. Improved P38 brake model. As to be able to ditch in friendly ack in a hurry, with 6 109's closing in.
 

[Kieran]

LOL

[AKDejaVu]

 

3. n1k2 rumored flight model bug?

Any idea on why this is just a rumor and can't be proven conclusively?  HTC has admitted modelling bugs before... so that's not necessarily the issue.  Could it be that is just a bunch of "that can't be right" or "something is wrong" accusations with no proof?

I think so.

AKDejaVu

[Jigster]

Ask Brady about the automatic combat flap operation Deja.

As it is now there are two sets of flaps on the N1K2. Those worked into the flight model like the 109's slats, and whatever those manual flaps do. That part isn't right. Whether the FM is bugged, oreo.

[BigJoe]

Sorry for hijacking thread and being first class butthead <S>! y'all you too AKDejaVu.

"I'm good enough
I'm smart enough
and dog gone it, people like me!"

Stuart Smalley  


[This message has been edited by BigJoe (edited 05-06-2001).]

[Mr. T]

Sounds like BigJoe has been shot down by one too many N1K2s....

"IT MUST HAVE A PROBLEM!! I KNOW IT!!"
-SW

[BigJoe]

LOL nope I just stay away from'em  

[GRUNHERZ]

LOL Here we go again, Mr T and his girlfriend DejaVu.....

 

[Mr. T]

Funny aren't you one of them queer LimpWristed LittleWiener LuftWhiners Grunherz?

Oh yeah you are.
-SW

[AKDejaVu]

 

Here we go again "Could it be that is just a bunch of "that can't be right" or "something is wrong" accusations with no proof?"
Hmmm, that seems to work for millions when they take their car to the mechanic.

Sure it does.. especially when they say "I dunno.. something is just wrong".  The mechanic will have it fixed in no time.  Yeah.. right.

 

But self imposed moderators here believe HTC needs them to screen their calls.

I'm sorry.. but where did I try to moderate this thread?  Where did I tell anyone not to post this or where to move it to?

How about this.. I don't agree with the statement.  I don't have the same problem with miraculous movements by N1K2s in the arena.  If you don't believe me.. check my stats.

Somehow, others maintain they see N1Ks doing unbelievable things anytime they see them.  I just can't figure out how this is so exclusive to them.

 

Let me clue ya in you are not important!, every company needs feedback no matter how vague it may sound.

I'm sorry... I fail to see where your post is feedback.  I fail to see where Cit saying the same thing OVER AND OVER AND OVER again is feedback.  Let me clue you in here.. if its not the P-38, Cit will criticize it.  It is the one great consting in AH.

 

You sir play no part whatever in deciding what gets fixed so why on earth does anyone need to proof anything to you or this community?

Read this over... VERY... VERY... SLOWLY.  

I PLAY NO PART WHAT(SO)EVER IN DECIDING WHAT GETS FIXED.

What I say is my beliefs alone.  If someone posts theirs here.. they'd better be prepared for people to post contrary.

 

Promote discussion, add your expertise, give advice to the community so it provides a learning enviroment everyone can benefit from.

I'm sorry.. was this thread intended to promote discussion?  I don't really see that.  Especially the "rummored flight model bug" statement.

 

Otherwise just shut your cake hole, thank you.

Shoulda followed your own advice.  Only one person in this thread is telling people what to post.  You.

AKDejaVu

[AKDejaVu]

 

LOL Here we go again, Mr T and his girlfriend DejaVu

To Grunherz and whatever other handles he happens to be using this week:

It seems your sole purpose these days is to jump in to any thread I post in and point out I posted there.  So be it.  Just don't forget who you are criticizing and why... then try to figure out how you are being any different.

AKDejaVu

[Pyro]

1- Haven't looked at it specifically but know what you're talking about.

2- Wanted to get that done for the last version but didn't get to it.  

3- Have looked at it for any obvious errors and have found none.  Except for fuel consumption rate, I think that's too low but need to check it.  The lift properties of its airfoil and its effect on turnrate is one area that I question.

Jigster, I have no idea what you're talking about.  The flaps have to be operated manually, we did not model the automatic flap feature for this plane.

Finally, I suggest some of you guys get a room and lay off of hijacking threads into your own personal flame wars.  It is getting old and this camel's back is getting strained.  Nuff said.



------------------
Doug "Pyro" Balmos
HiTech Creations

[Jigster]

Pyro I know this should be in the aircraft forum, but...


Am I correct in saying NONE of the lift and/or drag properties of the automatic flaps have been included in the N1K2's flight model outside manipulation of the manual flaps? (IE as opposed to the slats being taken into consideration for the 109's flight model)

That is to what I was refering, not actual pilot operation.

There may indeed be a problem then. I believe that the "fm bug" soley refers to it's lift and drag generation during manuvers.

[Jigster]

This would probably make good reading.