Author Topic: Slaughter at the Bridge of Death  (Read 4508 times)

Offline NUKE

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8599
      • Arizona Greens
Slaughter at the Bridge of Death
« Reply #60 on: April 02, 2003, 01:17:35 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Steve
So which is it Blitz?


Blitz quote: "You go there as Aggressors without UN permission and 12 years of Un sanctions with 1,5 million iraq people dying didn't help much to win their hearts. "


Blitz quote:"This is exactly why i'm against this war."

By your estimates, over 100,000 people a year are dying in Iraq.  So, if you are against the war, you must be in favor of us staying out of Iraq, which in turn means you are in favor of over 100,000 people a year dying there.

Blitz, you're talking out of both sides of your mouth.. you can't have it both ways.

Tell you what though.. let me set the table for you: What would you do Blitz?  Give us your solution to this mess.


LOL Steve, Blitz can't answer........ unless he wants re-establish how much of a moron he is.

Offline NUKE

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8599
      • Arizona Greens
Slaughter at the Bridge of Death
« Reply #61 on: April 02, 2003, 01:25:17 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by blitz
Sure ya government can give a crap what I think, but it better SHOULD care what the Pope, the churches, The UN, old friends and the majority of people on this planet has to say them.

THEY ARE AGAINST THIS BLOODY WAR AND WANT YOUR GOVERNMENT TO STOP THAT CRAP!



Regards Blitz



America was threatened by Iraq in no way, it was just plain ridiculous.


Why should we care what the pope thinks?

Offline Saintaw

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6692
      • My blog
Slaughter at the Bridge of Death
« Reply #62 on: April 02, 2003, 01:41:36 AM »
There already is a Euro-Disney park, it's located in Paris.

I'm surprised you didn't know that BIGBlololxxx.
Saw
Dirty, nasty furriner.

Offline blitz

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1007
Slaughter at the Bridge of Death
« Reply #63 on: April 02, 2003, 01:42:49 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Toad
Tell you what, you're a carpenter right? Let's have a race. I'll make a 6 x 6 centimeter miniature wooden tombstone for every innocent Iraqi killed in this conflict and you make one for every innocent Iraqi killed by Hussein and his mininons since Hussein gained power.

I'll bet I get done a long time before you do, and I'm not good at woodwork. :D



You just drawed a line between between Saddam Hussein and Mr. Bush, stop that!!!! :D



Regards Blitz



America was threatened by Iraq in no way, it was just plain ridiculous.

Offline blitz

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1007
Slaughter at the Bridge of Death
« Reply #64 on: April 02, 2003, 01:44:25 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by NUKE
Why should we care what the pope thinks?



Because America has a huge catholic community :)


Regards Blitz



America was threatened by Iraq in no way, it was just plain ridiculous, it's an bloody 'Aggression War'

Offline Duedel

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1787
Slaughter at the Bridge of Death
« Reply #65 on: April 02, 2003, 01:50:40 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by NUKE
Why should we care what the pope thinks?


Cause ur president is thinking he's on a crusade.

Offline blitz

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1007
Slaughter at the Bridge of Death
« Reply #66 on: April 02, 2003, 01:54:30 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Steve
So which is it Blitz?


Blitz quote: "You go there as Aggressors without UN permission and 12 years of Un sanctions with 1,5 million iraq people dying didn't help much to win their hearts. "


Blitz quote:"This is exactly why i'm against this war."

By your estimates, over 100,000 people a year are dying in Iraq.  So, if you are against the war, you must be in favor of us staying out of Iraq, which in turn means you are in favor of over 100,000 people a year dying there.

Blitz, you're talking out of both sides of your mouth.. you can't have it both ways.

Tell you what though.. let me set the table for you: What would you do Blitz?  Give us your solution to this mess.



Looks like YOUR government is responsible for this mess with supporting a murderer and user of WMDs for a long, long time.

Would have bein better to act with civility, instead of beating the war drum.

It's a strategic war to gain control over the middle east, has little to nothing to do with human rights of Iraq people for ya government.



Regards Blitz



America was threatened by Iraq in no way, it was just plain ridiculous.

Offline Martlet

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4390
Slaughter at the Bridge of Death
« Reply #67 on: April 02, 2003, 02:31:57 AM »
"Like a wounded rat, when backed into a corner, the Blitch will bite out at things that aren't there, while totally ignoring the topic in front of it."   National Geographic

Offline Steve

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6728
Slaughter at the Bridge of Death
« Reply #68 on: April 02, 2003, 11:47:40 AM »
Answer the question Blitz.  You don' want us in Iraq, over 100,000 people a year are dying in there.  If you think we shouldn't be in there, what is the solution. I'm challenging you to answer directly.
Member: Hot Soup Mafia - Cream of Myshroom
Army of Muppets  Yes, my ingame name is Steve

Offline blitz

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1007
Slaughter at the Bridge of Death
« Reply #69 on: April 02, 2003, 02:49:34 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Steve
Answer the question Blitz.  You don' want us in Iraq, over 100,000 people a year are dying in there.  If you think we shouldn't be in there, what is the solution. I'm challenging you to answer directly.



I would say the insane embargo killed the babies in the first place .


Regards Blitz




America was threatened by Iraq in no way, it was just plain ridiculous.

When will Vietnam people finally get an apology?

Offline Wlfgng

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5252
      • http://www.nick-tucker.com
Slaughter at the Bridge of Death
« Reply #70 on: April 02, 2003, 03:10:09 PM »
of course you would

very narrow view

Offline Steve

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6728
Slaughter at the Bridge of Death
« Reply #71 on: April 02, 2003, 03:17:37 PM »
Blitz, answer the question.  What would you do?  How many times do I need to ask you this?  You type all sorts of things opposing this or the other thing... but you offer no alternatives.  That makes you out to be an empty headed whiner blowhard. I'm giving you a chance to correct that.  Give an alternative solution to what is occuring or shut your bellybutton up, once and for all.
Member: Hot Soup Mafia - Cream of Myshroom
Army of Muppets  Yes, my ingame name is Steve

Offline BGBMAW

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2288
Slaughter at the Bridge of Death
« Reply #72 on: April 02, 2003, 03:17:51 PM »
Blitz is an idiot..proof is in the pudding...


Blitz says.
Quote
Germany never hurt anyone..anywhere...ever


..and Blitz says
Quote
There was no such thing as a holocuast..thats rediculous


More Great ideas from Blitz
 
Quote
America kills women and children on purpose



so we know what blitz is made up of...


hes a non-factor...

Offline blitz

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1007
Slaughter at the Bridge of Death
« Reply #73 on: April 02, 2003, 03:23:14 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Steve
Blitz, answer the question.  What would you do?  How many times do I need to ask you this?  You type all sorts of things opposing this or the other thing... but you offer no alternatives.  That makes you out to be an empty headed whiner blowhard. I'm giving you a chance to correct that.  Give an alternative solution to what is occuring or shut your bellybutton up, once and for all.





War is never an inevitable fate. War always means the defeat of humanity"

The overseas development agencies of the Roman Catholic and Protestant Churches in Germany - Brot für die Welt, Evangelischer Entwicklungsdienst (EED) and Misereor - strongly support the appeal directed to the international community on January 13 by Pope John Paul II. At no point does international law justify a "pre-emptive war", and claim-ing the right to such a war would seriously undermine the principles of the United Nations Charter. Our partners both in the region and beyond it fear a humanitarian disaster which would severely aggravate the situation of the poor.

The overseas development agencies of the Churches in Germany strongly urge the Federal Government of Germany to exercise its influence, together with like-minded European partners and by means of its vote in the United Nations Security Council, to avert the threat of military intervention in Iraq. All possible means of finding a peaceful solution to the conflict should be attempted, including the extension of the time-frame for the UN weapons inspections, so as to attain a higher degree of certainty regarding the actual threat posed by the ruling powers in Iraq.

We are especially concerned for the people of Iraq, who have already suffered for years under an oppressive regime and the consequences of the UN embargo. They would be the first victims of a military strike. A document compiled by a number of UN organisations describes a threatening yet plausible scenario involving horrendous cost to human lives - hundreds of thousands of people killed, injured or permanently maimed, plus another two million refugees in Iraq to add to the one million refugees presently in the region. Already inadequate medical facilities would be completely destroyed. Added to this would be the untold damage inflicted on the economic fabric and infrastructure of the country. Quite apart from this it is completely unclear under what political conditions and with what future perspective Iraq could be rebuilt.

It is impossible to predict the political and social effects of a war on neighbouring countries of the Middle East and in particular on the situation in Israel. The risk of provoking additional instability as well as creating new social and political causes of conflict is incalculable. It is to be feared that the price in terms of human lives would be very high.

Numerous partners of the churches in Africa and Asia have expressed warnings and fears regarding the potentially omi-nous effects of a war on Iraq on latent conflictive situations in their own countries. In these regions, as in the region in question, church representatives indicate that a military strike against Iraq would be regarded in their countries first and foremost as the attack of a Christian country on an Islamic one. They remind us of the riots that broke out in Nigeria as a reaction to the terrorist attack of September 11, 2001, causing the death of three thousand people.

For the above reasons we categorically reject all plans for war on Iraq.

Brot für die Welt
Evangelischer Entwicklungsdienst (EED)
MISEREOR

Stuttgart, Bonn, Aachen, 17th of January, 2003.


Regards Blitz



America was threatened by Iraq in no way, it was just plain ridiculous.

Offline blitz

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1007
Slaughter at the Bridge of Death
« Reply #74 on: April 02, 2003, 03:27:05 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Steve
Blitz, answer the question.  What would you do?  How many times do I need to ask you this?  You type all sorts of things opposing this or the other thing... but you offer no alternatives.  That makes you out to be an empty headed whiner blowhard. I'm giving you a chance to correct that.  Give an alternative solution to what is occuring or shut your bellybutton up, once and for all.




Dennis Halliday Interview

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: Seán McGinley
Subject: Dennis Halliday Interview
Date: Thu, 4 Nov 1999 15:37:39 +0100 (CET)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear Friends,
Following is a transcript of an interview with Dennis
Halliday broadcast at 8:45 GMT on Wednesday November
3rd on the Irish national radio station RTE Radio 1.
The interviewer is Richard Crowley.

Interviewer: U.N: Secretary General Kofi Annan has
re-appointed Hans von Sponeck as Humanitarian
Coordinator in Iraq, despite US and British efforts to
have him removed. Dennis Halliday, who's been accused
in the US press of having influenced von Sponeck says
the Americans and the British simply don't want the
world to hear that thousands are dying because of the
sanctions.

Dennis Halliday: I believe it's a matter of being
embarrased by having a reputable individual in Baghdad
who is speaking out against the impact of these
economic sanctions, for which Britain is largely
responsible; sanctions which are not impacting on the
leadership of the country but instead are in fact
responsible for infant mortality, gross malnourishment
of the population and the destruction of an entire
society. I think they're frustrated at having an
international civil servant who lives in Baghdad, sees
what he sees, and speaks up.
I understand their reaction but it's really
unacceptable to interfere in the management of an
organisation which is the responsibility of the
Secretary General.

Interviewer: How can they dispute what you said, when
you were there; what Mr. von Sponeck says when he's
there; how can they ignore that or dispute it, do you
think ?

Halliday: Well, the fact is I don't think they do
dispute it, they simply put a political spin on it
because they don't like the truth. We've seen
Madeleine Albright on Television in this country
announcing that the deaths of 500 000 children were
worth it, in terms of containing President Saddam
Hussein.
It's just a very uncomfortable feeling, and they know
it's true, they just can't accept it politically.

Interviewer: Given the strength of the opposition to
what Mr. von Sponeck is saying or doing, what can Kofi
Annan and others who wish to provide some kind of
humanitarian aid to the area, what can they do ?

Halliday: I think the Secretary General will continue
to resist this sort of interference, but more
importantly I think is that the Secretary General will
have to move and influence the member states towrds
lifting economic sanctions, that is the only way to
begin to resolve the plight of the children and the
people of Iraq.

Interviewer: But how might they do that, given the
strength of opposition?

Halliday: Well, you know the opposition is only in
Britain and the United States. I think the issue now
is more on the balance, that is the maintenance of
some sort of military sanctions.
Clearly the whole Middle East needs to be downgraded
in terms of military capacity; and secondly I believe
there should be sanctions against the manufacture and
sale of military hardware, which of course would
impact on Europe, North America and, I'm sorry to say,
even the Republic Of Ireland, where now licencing has
been given to some 80 companies to manufacture
component parts of military weapons.


Regards Blitz



America was threatened by Iraq in no way, it was just plain ridiculous.

When will Vietnam people finally get an apology