SPOOK:
a piece of machinery which has 1 purpose and 1 purpose only, to seriously maim or end human life?
Sorry, Spook. This statement is just BS. There are too many examples that prove the contrary to bother listing them.
However, I understand that it's a vacuous, airy-fairy generalization that makes your position seem "correct" to anyone without the intelligence or desire to educate themselves.
SPOOK:
Its the human with the gun. How do you regulate and risk manage that? Theres only one way and thats gun control.
It's the
criminal human with the gun. There are ways to regulate that; in fact I'm sure it comes as no surprise to you that there are hundreds of laws on the books with that exact purpose.
The problem is that your side desires not to "regulate" the human with the gun. You side desires to prohibit the human from having a gun. Thus, the confiscation in Australia and Britain.
You don't really talk about "gun control"; you folks are for gun prohibition and confiscation.
That approach has totally poisoned the discussion. There are those here in the US that aren't really opposed to somewhat increased regulation of firearms.
However, it's MORE than clear that no matter how much new "regulation" our side supports, endorses and complies with, IT WILL NEVER BE ENOUGH.
Nope.
The other side always wants more.... until we end up with the Brit/Aussie "solution" which is no reasonable solution at all.
Therefore, there's always going to be opposition to even the smallest increase in "regulation" here. It's the "camel's nose"; no matter what the law abiding gun owners agree too, they realize it will not stop the antis drive to confiscate every firearm extant.
There are reasonable people on one side; on the other side there's the unreasonable confiscators.
Pretty clear where you sit.