Journalists where not allowed near the colllapsed building, the one shown in the pic you posted is not the building in question.
Of course it is. He's standing right by the building as the pass rubble out. Have you actually watched the video report? How about this one from Sky news, he's also right by the building:
http://news.sky.com/skynews/video/videoplayer/0,,31200-bowden_p18194,00.html#What do you base this claim that journalists were not allowed near on?
Injurys aside there is still NO blood on any of the victoms
I certainly saw blood on some of them, but again in a dry, dusty enviroment, people buried by rubble aren't likely to have a lot of blood visible.
How many shots of earthquake victims show lots of blood?
You cannot explain why some of them are CLEAN, free of dust, and look like they've been dead a while.
Sorry, none of them look that way to me.
There's a photo of two of the dead children on the BBC news site. One is very dusty, the other fairly clean. But if you look at the cleaner girl, half her face is very dirty. This is entirely consistent if she was covered by bedclothes, for example.
Go to a site called globalresearch.ca it has a series of photographs from Qana (they aren't on the main page). The pictures look entirely consistent with survivors pulled from the rubble of a collapsed building, and I challenge you to look at them and claim otherwise.
Don't forget, the worse the injuries on a body, the less likely it is to make the news in the "MSM". The BBC, for example, would never show many of the injuries suffered.
You cannot explain why some of them are in FULL rigor mortis after only 7 or 1 hours (again depending on your source)
After 7 hours? How do you know these pictures are from 8am when the press turned up, and not say 10am, when they were still brining bodies out?
And even 7 hours is easily long enough to develop rigor mortis.
lastly I'd like to see your source where the IDF says no missles where fired from the area.
On the day.
"As the Israel Air Force continues to investigate the air strike, questions have been raised over military accounts of the incident.
It now appears that the military had no information on rockets launched from the site of the building, or the presence of Hezbollah men at the time.
The Israel Defense Forces had said after the deadly air-strike that many rockets had been launched from Qana. However, it changed its version on Monday.
The site was included in an IAF plan to strike at several buildings in proximity to a previous launching site. Similar strikes were carried out in the past. However, there were no rocket launches from Qana on the day of the strike.
"
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/pages/ShArtVty.jhtml?sw=qana&itemNo=745185but your reply is based soley on sources from the ground......sources that benifit from this being a massacere.
And the conspiracy theories emanate from people who weren't at the scene, and have a clear agenda.
So, of course, someone in Peoria who has never been outside the US has a better idea of what happened in the middle of the night in Qana than someone who was actually there?
A lot of journalists and camera crews went to Qana. How many of them, the foreign press who were actually there, are supporting the conspiracy claims? None.
So obvioulsy the man in Peoria knows better than the journalists who were there, too.
These conspiracy theories might have some credibility if they came from someone with some actual knowledge of the incident, but no-one who has any knowledge of the incident is making such claims.
