Author Topic: You're Not Telling Us What We Want to Hear (Read 2559 times)

storch · « **Reply #60 on:** November 19, 2006, 12:24:35 PM »

viking, that doesn't sound like squirming to me. he pretty much nailed you and all you can do is

MrRiplEy[H] · « **Reply #61 on:** November 19, 2006, 05:39:43 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by storch
viking, that doesn't sound like squirming to me. he pretty much nailed you and all you can do is

Hmm.. with this kind of quotes:

Quote

Originally posted by lazs2 in March 2003
dowding.. one minor correction... iraq will not be a terrorist state once sadman and his ilk are removed.
lazs

you are left with nothing but an age old saying: caught with his pants down.

john9001 · « **Reply #62 on:** November 19, 2006, 05:47:10 PM »

not so fast, saddam may be removed but his "ilk" are still fighting. But not for long, as soon as the democrats "redeploy" the US troops out of Iraq the fighting will be over and we will have peace in our time. Murtha told me so.

storch · « **Reply #63 on:** November 19, 2006, 06:37:35 PM »

no reply from me necessary, good point john9001

MrRiplEy[H] · « **Reply #64 on:** November 20, 2006, 02:15:19 AM »

It would have been a good post unless it was flawed.

Al-Qaeda was not active in Iraq under Saddams rule. Now IT has the rule.

And each new day of violence will breed more dead fathers and fundamentalist sons and daughters to fight for the cause. Saddams Iraq was an absess full of puss. Now the absess is broken, but instead of curing it went gangrenous because outside elements got in.

If day 1 predictions are accurate, Iraq will end up as being a fundamentalist government which will actively repursue WMD but only this time fully also support Osama and his cause. Bad stuff, seriously bad stuff.

Viking · « **Reply #65 on:** November 20, 2006, 02:49:54 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by storch
viking, that doesn't sound like squirming to me. he pretty much nailed you and all you can do is

Oh Lazs just can't stand to be reminded that he gets his paycheck from American taxes. Some libertarian indeed, getting his livelihood from a socialist system. However he isn't the only one I look forward to watching squirm in the near future. You Storch is also a prime target!

Back in 2003 when Hortlund said you were lucky to have such a great leader as President Bush:

Quote

Originally posted by storch
We aren't lucky. We are blessed beyond measure.

Quote

Originally posted by storch
I am able to laugh at that and my blood pressure wouldn't rise. I know beyond any measure that President Bush is the best leader in the world today. Given all the whining , howling and knashing of teeth your effeminates produce lately this is really off the chain. The litmus test for me is how the euros react to our leaders. This one is a winner even though for me he is to moderate. I can't wait for a real con to get into the White House. Of course, sadly this will never happen.

God bless America, God bless President Bush. Pray for the euros. They sorely need revival.

four more years.

Quote

Originally posted by storch
I think the point is missed, we wanted Iraq. we took Iraq. who knows maybe you will be next. who? you! yes you! WMD be damned we need the parking spaces for our next excursion into the region. I'm sure the fossil fuels are a nice perk as well.

Some of you guys are so naive. we are finally on the path of world conquest.

Some world conquest! Can't even occupy a couple of third world nations, getting beaten by cave dwellers!

Quote

Originally posted by storch
We will find, manipulate conditions, control and anhiliate them because we are the greatest power on earth. resistence is futile.

How Borg of you!

Quote

Originally posted by storch
I think we are there to secure a steady and abundant source of oil for ourselves and our allies. if we have an added bonus that we deny the french and the germans that opportunity, so much the better. he who controls the oil controls the world. we are after all the last superpower it's nice to flex. it's nice to see the euros squirm. perhaps then we may be able rely less on the saudis for our oil and also replace their heavy investments in our markets thereby placing ourselves in a situation where if they were to take their (saudi) money to the eurot markets we might not be so badly impacted. this is my view but what do I know? I'm mighty glad that we are there also. The invasion had my full support for the above stated reason. As side note kicking saddam in the teeth was good. we need to roll on in the region and N. Africa as well. there are other sources of fossil fuel, ya know.

Who's squirming now Storch? Sure isn't Europeans!

All this fun from just the first 3 pages of your posts. 60 or so more to go, but I'll pace myself. Got to make this last a bit.

storch · « **Reply #66 on:** November 20, 2006, 06:53:27 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Viking
Who's squirming now Storch? Sure isn't Europeans!

All this fun from just the first 3 pages of your posts. 60 or so more to go, but I'll pace myself. Got to make this last a bit.

what have any of those posts to do with the current US position and iraq? I fail to see your point. the fact remains that we will be in iraq as long as they are a source of crude, just as we have been in the region since the 1930's. The US rules the world purely and simply, be thankful we don't use our considerable military ability as some of you euros would if you had the power. the legislature may be in democratic control currently but it is certainly not out of balance. I think we will be in iraq for many years to come. furthermore I believe we will be expanding our influence even more throughout the region. lastly I'm flattered you took time out of your day to research my opinions. thank you. sadly you won't see me reciprocate in kind I find you very to be predictably euro and of little consequence. you are dismissed now, carry on your research.

lazs2 · « **Reply #67 on:** November 20, 2006, 08:56:49 AM »

viking... I don't think you understand a fee over a tax or enterprise funds. In most of America... we pay a fee for things like water and garbage and sewer... it is based on use... a user fee...

Now, I am all for user fees. I have said so many times but they need to be enterprise funds and they need to be open for bid. The money paid by user fees should go only to that service. since I have said this many times... that makes you either a liar (as you claim I am) or... stupid.

As for sadman and his ilk? Yep... we need to fight em. At this point I am thinking that these toolshedders and nutjobs can't really get along with each other so we should just divide their country up into two or three chunks.

Is there anything else you need cleared up?

lazs

Viking · « **Reply #68 on:** November 20, 2006, 10:18:38 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by storch
what have any of those posts to do with the current US position and iraq? I fail to see your point. the fact remains that we will be in iraq as long as they are a source of crude, just as we have been in the region since the 1930's

Naw, you'll flee from Iraq like you fled Vietnam. The way things are going they might even throw you out. Your campaign in Iraq has been one big blunder after another and once again you prove that you don't have the stomach for a prolonged conflict. This war has shown the world just how shortsighted and weak America has become.

Quote

Originally posted by storch
The US rules the world purely and simply, be thankful we don't use our considerable military ability as some of you euros would if you had the power

LOL hardly. Each day that passes you make yourselves more irrelevant; your economy relying more and more on foreign loans and investments. America could sink into the ocean right now and the rest of the world would hardly take notice. It would be just like 9/11; we'd look at the news and say "oh, that's too bad" while sipping our morning coffee. I'm one of the few that would actually miss you.

john9001 · « **Reply #69 on:** November 20, 2006, 10:33:55 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Viking
Naw, you'll flee from Iraq like you fled Vietnam.

you need a refresher course on the vietman war, i would suggest you start with "operation linebacker two" and the "paris peace accords".

Viking · « **Reply #70 on:** November 20, 2006, 10:38:35 AM »

I don't think so; all I need to remember is that picture of that last Huey lifting of from the US embassy with Vietnamese collaborators hanging on to the skids.

john9001 · « **Reply #71 on:** November 20, 2006, 11:17:38 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Viking
I don't think so; all I need to remember is that picture of that last Huey lifting of from the US embassy with Vietnamese collaborators hanging on to the skids.

that photo was taken two years after the north was forced to sign a peace treaty that they then broke.

Viking · « **Reply #72 on:** November 20, 2006, 01:50:38 PM »

Interesting. Iraq was forced to sign a peace treaty in 1991 which you then broke. Even President Bush acknowledges the similarities with the Vietnam War.

john9001 · « **Reply #73 on:** November 20, 2006, 02:04:49 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Viking
Interesting. Iraq was forced to sign a peace treaty in 1991 which you then broke. Even President Bush acknowledges the similarities with the Vietnam War.

i don't know how you can be so wrong about so many things, saddam agreed to a cease fire in 1991 and then saddam broke every condition of the cease fire for 12 years, that is why the USA invaded.

MrRiplEy[H] · « **Reply #74 on:** November 20, 2006, 02:18:08 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by john9001
i don't know how you can be so wrong about so many things, saddam agreed to a cease fire in 1991 and then saddam broke every condition of the cease fire for 12 years, that is why the USA invaded.

That's not even remotely the reason that your leadership gave when they did, now is it?

Seems like new reasons pop up as things progress. Storch hit the spot though, oil reserves.