I still cant believe some of you really think having Icons is "more" realistic, that is absurd plain and simple, I am gonna quote myself
"Most of the sticks in WW2 that where killed by AtA, NEVER saw there attacker, gee I wonder why that is??? maybe cause they did not have a 40 foot neon sign, that is bright glowing red over there damn plane.
the one that SAW the other first 99.9% of the time won the engagement period.
think about it, they painted the planes to be harder to see IE a dark top, light bottom, so when you saw a con you would position yourself in his blind spot come in and kill him and get away, if the con that is being attacked looks around he will not see the nme approaching due to the planes camo, unless of course he spots him in adverse colors, or light glinting off the nme plane, (which they tried to have NOT happen)
MANY conflicts never happened, because they just flew by each other without ever seeing one another.
if you really believe Icons on is more realistic, then having them off
obviously the monitor cannot simulate the Human eye, but that is not why "icons on" is implemented, they are on because otherwise it would be a arena full of guys dying without ever seeing the con attacking them, IF they ever even see each other at all."
you guys can "think" icons on is more realistic, but it does not make it so.