Some of us KNOW you are REALLY davidwales ... !!!
"I, who do not accept the unearned, neither in values nor in guilt, am here to ask the questions you evaded. Why is it moral to serve the happiness of others, but not your own? If enjoyment is a value, why is it moral when experienced by others, but immoral when experienced by you? If the sensation of eating a cake is a value, why is it an immoral indulgence in your stomach, but a moral goal for you to achieve in the stomach of others? Why is it immoral for you to desire, but moral for others to do so? Why is it immoral to produce a value and keep it, but moral to give it away? And if it is not moral for you to keep a value, why is it moral for others to accept it? If you are selfless and virtuous when you give it, are they not selfish and vicious when they take it? Does virtue consist of serving vice? is the moral purpose of those who are good, self-immolation for the sake of those who are evil?"--Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged
"look at me I am making a derogatory remark to the OP"
You started this thread and it was obviously about your want and desire in spite of your use of 'we' and Google.
Who is John Galt?
Your soft and mushy Banana??? I dont think they miss that:)
Screw you!No longer will I will I be complementing you on your taste in heeled shoes
dave this is a friendly reminder the flying wing didnt work at all
perk police ???
but surely there must be a way to see if certain players only change sides for perks , perks are rewards how can it be fair to increase your perks , by taking adavantage of a weak side without any thought for the players who may have worked hard to gain that player a chance to vulch a weak enemy , perk tax is good idea wish had thought of it .
d-40 and d-11 easily out turn a spixteen
What's next?Propellorless aeroplanes???
the inconvienience it imposes on players who do not consider loyalty to be important.
