Lazs
I read your post above, and I can tell you were trying to be nice.
Have you been practising? Muhahaha -
One of the problems you are having is a constant wrangle with the truth. You come out with statements that are patently false, and wonder why events around you fail to make sense.
90% of the time there are no decent furballs. the reason people are frustrated with the map is because it is not only possible, but likely, that you will fly for an hour or two and never find a decent furball. If you do find one then it is very likely that someone will ruin it before very long.
I disagree entirely. I was on for at least five hours last night, and never got bored. I found all the action I wanted in an area to the north of the pizza, and it was non-stop. The risk of someone ruining it before long is greatest on the children’s maps, on which an interloper can take off from a “remote” field, and get to you in five minutes. That’s because the fields are too close together on the children’s maps.
Because I’ve been a meanie in the past on the BBS instead of agreeing with you all the time, your reaction has been to portray me as an unskilled dweeb. OK, if it pleases you, I will accept the mantle of unskilled dweeb. But then you rail on about my k/d being 2/1. The only place where you can find a plane by plane breakdown of k/d by plane is on the stats pages. The score pages do not show this. (Admittedly, the score pages do not seem to tally with the stats pages - so pick whichever one makes me look worse, and use that) Instead, all fighter scores are lumped together, and sorties flown as attack sorties are not taken into account. This has suited your cause to denounce me admirably in the past, because I used to score my jabo sorties separately.
But the reason you can’t understand the score line in my films is because you would rather judge my driving style by the colour of my car than by taking a ride with me. When confronted by raw data and by proof, you then have to twist and turn and look for other ways to put me down in furtherance of your cause. The k/d FACTS for the current tour are these.
- 109G10 4.3/1.
- 109F4 7/1
- F4U-1C 8/1
- 190A5 9/1
Been getting better with the G10 since dumping the spud cannon and going back to gondolas – better for angles shots. Yes, I do fly some late war monsters. The 109G10 is good for survivability. You have the luxury of flying as part of a squad. My squadmates got pissed off with AH gameplay and left. So I fly alone a lot and need survivability, but you will never see me in a P51/LA7/Spit ix/YAK9U.
You do it in late war monsters or perk planes during off peak hours for the most part
However, the 109F4 and 190A5 are neither late war monsters nor perk planes, so do you have any of your special brand of rhetoric to cover the situation? Unskilled dweeb I may be, but I have to be holding the handle when these planes do their stuff.
The films are from this week's pizza, but if it suits your cause, feel free to quote unrelated stats from earlier tours - anything you like to show me in the worst possible light.
Yet again, you have taken one of my films, and tried to steer the discussion towards personal achievement. My post here is only necessary because you continue to refute the facts and seek to portray me in the worst possible light by quoting misleading, inaccurate, irrelevant and out of date stats. Are you mad at me for not needing a gun? But OK. Tomorrow’s film will be a better one, in which there is a lot of action going on around me. The object is of course to show how wrong you are about inactivity on the pizza map.
