Originally posted by k2cok
Holden, I guess we disagree on the definition of the word "lie", Bush was told by the US Air Force before the war that the Iraqi UAV's were not WMD delivery systems.
No disagreement at all, k2.
Lie: to make an untrue statement with intent to deceive.
This requires one telling a lie not to be deceived himself. If one knowingly tells falsehoods, then it is a lie. If one one believes it to be the truth, then no intent exists: therefore it is not a lie.
The 16 words in SOU are still backed up by British intel.
I could convert a Piper tri-pacer into a weapons carrier with a plastic bag and some duct tape in about 10 minutes. Worrying about Iraqi RPV's is not unreasonable.
You argue that Bush lied because we have not found WMDs. We could find a stash tomorrow, and your argument would prove baseless. Your argument on WMD's is based on no WMD's found, therefore your argument is based on nothing.
The information that the public presently posesses is enough to develop a healthy skepticism, but going beyond skeptic thinking to believe you have absolute knowledge which is based on the lack of information is foolish.