Author Topic: America catches up to the modern world (slowly) (Read 4104 times)

SOB · « **Reply #75 on:** May 17, 2004, 02:58:45 PM »

But perhaps that person will just be a smoke-o-phobe. He may not hate you, just the result from you burning/smoking a cigarette. Damn, this is getting complicated.

midnight Target · « **Reply #76 on:** May 17, 2004, 02:58:51 PM »

So if you hate BDSM and smoking you'd be a ropesmokerphobe?

ravells · « **Reply #77 on:** May 17, 2004, 03:01:26 PM »

And if you were gay and hated BDSM and smoking you'd be a homoropesmokerphobe.

This is begining to sound like a hydrocarbon compound!

Ravs

Eagler · « **Reply #78 on:** May 17, 2004, 03:08:45 PM »

RedTail

a co-workers uncle flew with the Tuskegee back when they had P47's. Can't remeber his name but he had two kills b4 he was shot down and killed. He has a P51 redtail. Do you know where I can find the P47 they flew or have a picture of one/link?
thanks

Eagler · « **Reply #79 on:** May 17, 2004, 03:11:50 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by SOB
LOL! That was funny, however, if you're gonna post pics of homosexuals in the future, post pics of hot lesbians, not dudes. Unless that's something you're into. Not that there's anything wrong with that. Nancy.

LOL

Hot? they are only in the movies - any "real" ones I've seen can pass for short ugly men with a bad haircut in need of Kramers manzier

SOB · « **Reply #80 on:** May 17, 2004, 03:15:30 PM »

I never said they had to be real...and that goes for their boobs as well.

Thud · « **Reply #81 on:** May 17, 2004, 04:47:38 PM »

Classic ignorant statement that pretty much summarizes this thread and all other similar ones:

Quote

I am not a homophobe, I just believe homosexuality is immoral

For those that believe that isn't contradictory:

Definition: "Homophobia: prejudice against (fear or dislike of) homosexual people and homosexuality."

capt. apathy · « **Reply #82 on:** May 17, 2004, 04:57:38 PM »

actually phobias are unreasonable fears. a homophobe would be someone who has unreasonable fear of homosexuals.

I'm not afraid of them or the disgusting things they do. however, like the majority of people in this state, in this country, and on this planet, I homosexual acts immoral.

I find guys who cheat on their wife immoral also, doesn't mean I have some sort of phobia.

there are plenty of people that label fits, but it gets thrown around way too often. it's a common ploy, when someone disagrees with you group them together, put a label on 'm, and do your best to make sure the lable paints them as unreasonable.

btw- I find it interesting that people can find a few examples of defective animals and use this as 'proof' that the same defects in humans isn't a defect at all.

straffo · « **Reply #83 on:** May 17, 2004, 04:59:47 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by lasersailor184
Homosexuality became a common practice for men in greece and rome just before they fell. Once they were commonly accepted, the empires "Happened" to collapse.

You might call that a coincidence, I call it an act of god...

Yep it's a act of god ,it happen that the collapse of Rome followed the convertion of Constantin and the emergence of christianism as the main religion in the empire

So is it christianism or homosexuality ?

Try get your fact straight and stop fantasize please.

Saurdaukar · « **Reply #84 on:** May 17, 2004, 05:14:52 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Thud
Classic ignorant statement that pretty much summarizes this thread and all other similar ones:

For those that believe that isn't contradictory:

Definition: "Homophobia: prejudice against (fear or dislike of) homosexual people and homosexuality."

Just because y'all changed the meaning of the word doesnt make it applicable here.

Remember when the word "gay" had nothing to do with sticking poles in the wrong holes?

Another five, six years and we wont even be able to say "gay" without being called 'ignorant' as you say. By that time, Im sure youll have conjured up another word - less offensive to the sensitive chaps of the rectal router persuasion, of course. Probably something along the lines of "hertosexuality challenged" or "vaginaphobe" perhaps.

storch · « **Reply #85 on:** May 17, 2004, 05:18:46 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Thud
Classic ignorant statement that pretty much summarizes this thread and all other similar ones:

For those that believe that isn't contradictory:

Definition: "Homophobia: prejudice against (fear or dislike of) homosexual people and homosexuality."

Here we go again. why don't you avant gard European social experimenters keep messing up your homes and keep your opinions there as well? We are quite happy in America with our morals and values. We have in this case four judicial activists legislating from the bench. The people have spoken on this issue and America is overwhelming against homosexual marriage. This imbecillic decision in Massachusetts will most likely be the catalyst for a Constitutional amendment defining marriage as between one man and one woman.

The profound consequences of this incredibly stupid act go far beyond mere homosexuality as we will see in the coming months. I predict plural marriages as in 3 men and 3 women or any combination thereof. How about man and sheep? or Men and underaged boys? where do you draw the line?

It's not over, It's not even beginning. But it will soon enough.

Thud · « **Reply #86 on:** May 17, 2004, 05:19:21 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by capt. apathy
actually phobias are unreasonable fears. a homophobe would be someone who has unreasonable fear of homosexuals.

I'm not afraid of them or the disgusting things they do. however, like the majority of people in this state, in this country, and on this planet, I homosexual acts immoral.

I find guys who cheat on their wife immoral also, doesn't mean I have some sort of phobia.

there are plenty of people that label fits, but it gets thrown around way too often. it's a common ploy, when someone disagrees with you group them together, put a label on 'm, and do your best to make sure the lable paints them as unreasonable.

btw- I find it interesting that people can find a few examples of defective animals and use this as 'proof' that the same defects in humans isn't a defect at all.

In fact you do unreasonably fear homosexuals, you are afraid that they will become accepted as defacto normal and you no longer can label them as immoral and see that prejudice affirmed by them being less-privileged by law.
And if you have the same mindset that many of the 'gay-opposers' on this BBS have than you're also afraid that they might teach your children, influence your neighbourhood by their presence, visit your church and generally invade your life by being present in your environment.

Indeed a phobia...

Thud · « **Reply #87 on:** May 17, 2004, 05:24:55 PM »

Ah, to our old narrowminded bible-thumper:

Storch, you hungry?

.

NUKE · « **Reply #88 on:** May 17, 2004, 06:06:12 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by midnight Target
Being gay is no more immoral than being left handed.

What the heck are you guys worried about... really?

If everyone was left handed, the human race would still continue.

I believe homos (my bad for saying homo?) are immoral, but I don't dislike them as people. I don't judge anyone.

ravells · « **Reply #89 on:** May 17, 2004, 06:09:25 PM »

I don't understand this Nuke.

How can you call someone 'immoral' if they have no bearing on your life?

Ravs

Author Topic: America catches up to the modern world (slowly) (Read 4104 times)

storch