Author Topic: P38 a super plane?  (Read 16289 times)

Offline MiloMorai

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6863
P38 a super plane?
« Reply #45 on: November 28, 2004, 10:13:09 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Crumpp

So you just counted sorties that crossed the German Border?

Quit splitting hairs.  You were wrong on the number of sorties and painted a false perception.  


To bad Widewing that Crumpp could not read you original statement correctly in the first place. Still seems he has some troubles.


Now what was the cruise setting for the range you state for the P-47? American pilots were not as dumb as the German pilots and cruise at the MOST economical speed in a combat zone. **

Now Crumpp, what P-47 pilot would fly at MOST economical cruise in a combat zone? The action radius range of the P-47 with 2 150gal tanks would put it over the Ruhr and even then the radius would depend when the dts were dropped.

** how Barbi's claims the range of the 109

You also forget that 'enemy' territory was not just Germany but continental Europe.


Lets say it was 4400 LW sorties;
5 days in Big Week;
2 sorties/day;
= 440 a/c.

At the end of May '44 the LW had ~1201 'fighter' a/c in the West (Norway, MTO excluded). Did you not once tell us Crumpp that the LW was 'finished' before this? So then the LW must have been capable of those 4400 sorties since it was still a force to be reconned with in Feb '44 if it had 1201 'figthers' in May after being decimated in the months preceeding May.

Offline Crumpp

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3671
P38 a super plane?
« Reply #46 on: November 28, 2004, 10:26:27 AM »
Quote
So then the LW must have been capable of those 4400 sorties since it was still a force to be reconned with in Feb '44 if it had 1201 'figthers' in May after being decimated in the months preceeding May.


Well Milo please produce the documentation showing 4400 sorties.  Any documentation or source would be appreciated.


The subject is the P47's range.  
The range comes from the USAF museum at Wright Patterson.

As for the Luftwaffe fighting ability:

Are you implying that Operation Argument did not break the back of the Jagdwaffe?  If you are that is wrong because it did.  

Yes Galland did attempt to rebuild the Jagdwaffe in the following months.  He almost succeeded numerically.  Skill and pilot quality he did not.  Bodenplatte squandered his efforts and for the most part completely destroyed the Jagdwaffe.

You claim I misread Widewing:

Quote
To bad Widewing that Crumpp could not read you original statement correctly in the first place. Still seems he has some troubles.


Please point out where I did:

Quote
Facing these 50 fighters were 200-400 Luftwaffe fighters.


First false statement from Widewing.  He creates the perception that all 200 Luftwaffe fighters were opposing 50 p38's.  Not true.  Those 200 fighters had to defend the entire Western European theater and the Reich.  Widewing does not include the hundreds of P47's and the few P51's that were present either.

Quote
During "Big Week", the 8th AF put up 3,300 bomber sorties, supported by 1,620 fighter sorties (deep escort). In response, the Luftwaffe put up 4,399 fighter sorties.... Hmm, they don't seem outnumbered by American fighters yet, do they?


Second false statement from Widewing.  Widewing uses the number of FIGHTER sorties that crossed the German border to create a false perception again.  No historian will accept that the Luftwaffe flew more sorties than the USAAF in Feb '44.  It is just not true.  Just the number of FIGHTER is thousands over his number.  Factor in the knowledge that the Luftwaffe's mission was to intercept the Thousands of bombers and not tangle with fighters and it becomes even more idiotic the picture he attempts to create.

Quote
Yeah, there were hundreds of P-47s, by they couldn't get beyond the German border. In February of '44, the 8th AF could put up 5 fighter groups that could penetrate German airspace. That's still less than 200 fighters.


Third false statement from Widewing.  The first USAAF shot down over German soil was a P47.  They had the range to escort to all but a few targets.  According to the USAAF the P47's were present in their own combat reports.  

Quote
Now what was the cruise setting for the range you state for the P-47? American pilots were not as dumb as the German pilots and cruise at the MOST economical speed in a combat zone. **


So you contention is they flew around on WEP as soon as they went feet dry over France?  Or even full Military Power? Suggest you talk to some pilots.

Crumpp
« Last Edit: November 28, 2004, 10:38:16 AM by Crumpp »

Offline Crumpp

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3671
P38 a super plane?
« Reply #47 on: November 28, 2004, 12:24:07 PM »
Quote
At the end of May '44 the LW had ~1201 'fighter' a/c in the West (Norway, MTO excluded). Did you not once tell us Crumpp that the LW was 'finished' before this? So then the LW must have been capable of those 4400 sorties since it was still a force to be reconned with in Feb '44 if it had 1201 'figthers' in May after being decimated in the months preceeding May


Lets look at the total number of fighters available to the entire Luftwaffe.  This is not serviceable fighters but total available and has to cover every front and theater.



Facts are the 8th USAAF could and did launch more bombers in 1944 than the Germans had fighters to attack them.

Facts are the Germans stupidly got involved in a war they could not win and compounded this mistake by piling blunder upon blunder on top of it.  The perception of a "big and undefeatable" Luftwaffe was created by the minds of the propaganda ministry.  This legacy still haunts history.

Yes Milo.  The Luftwaffe was finished.  Air Superiority passed to the USAAF after Operation Argument and never returned to the Luftwaffe.  The Luftwaffe could no longer mount a "maximum" response to every Allied incursion.  They had to conserve their strength in order to have any hope of stopping the bombers and could not afford to mix it up with fighters.  Thus USAAF fighters could dominate European Airspace just with their presence.

Before Operation Argument the Luftwaffe's ability to pick and choose it's fights was a tactical luxury.  Now it was a strategic necessity.

Crumpp

Offline Widewing

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8800
P38 a super plane?
« Reply #48 on: November 28, 2004, 01:38:31 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Crumpp
Well Milo please produce the documentation showing 4400 sorties.  Any documentation or source would be appreciated.


The subject is the P47's range.  
The range comes from the USAF museum at Wright Patterson.
[/B]

I gave you the source. Here's another: Duel for the Sky by Christopher Shores.

Idiot...those number are for the P-47D-40-RA, which had a greater internal capacity (65 gallons) and could carry 183 more gallons under the wings and fuselage than the earlier P-47s in service in early 1944.

Quote

First false statement from Widewing.  He creates the perception that all 200 Luftwaffe fighters were opposing 50 p38's.  Not true.  Those 200 fighters had to defend the entire Western European theater and the Reich.  Widewing does not include the hundreds of P47's and the few P51's that were present either.


It was true statement. Go back and read again Einstein, I was refering to operations BEFORE 1944. There were no P-51s available for deep penetrations and P-47s were limited to a single 75 gallon belly tank, incapable of reaching Germany. Furthermore, there were many more than 200 German fighters defending the Reich....:rolleyes:

 
Quote

Second false statement from Widewing.  Widewing uses the number of FIGHTER sorties that crossed the German border to create a false perception again.  No historian will accept that the Luftwaffe flew more sorties than the USAAF in Feb '44.  It is just not true.


Again, you insist on changing the argument to support your bullsheet. You insist on referring to the entire month of February when the discussion was about a period of 5 days in late February. What's funny is that you cannot see through your own smokescreen.
 
Quote

Third false statement from Widewing.  The first USAAF shot down over German soil was a P47.  They had the range to escort to all but a few targets.  According to the USAAF the P47's were present in their own combat reports.


Once again you refer to the range of a P-47 model not available until much later in the war. Those P-47s in Britain at the time had a maximum radius of action of 350 miles IF they they had the 108 gallon drop tank. That also assumes climb to only 25,000 feet. Most P-47s were assigned escort altitudes greater than 30,000 feet. This reduced their radius by up to 50 miles. Furthermore, that radius excludes assembly time, which could cut into the radius by another 50 miles. Fighter Groups based on sod fields could not use the 108 gallon tank as it was usually ripped off during the takeoff run. These were limited to single 75 gallon tanks. Not all P-47s were assigned escort tasks to the German border. Groups flew relay coverage. Some groups never got within 100 miles of Germany. Unfortunately for the Luftwaffe, they made the mistake of attacking the bombers when they were being protected by hundreds of Thunderbolts. This error in tactics is what caused the majority of Luftwaffe fighter losses. The very best units in the 8th AF were flying P-47s, not P-38s or P-51s. However, those two types did the escort duty for deep penetrations to the targets.


In early March, the 56th and a few other P-47 groups received their first 108 gallon drop tanks but only a few of their fighters were plumbed for a pair of these under the wings. When all in-service Jugs were modified they finally could stretch their range to the Elbe. During Big Week, the deepest P-47 penetration was to the area of Dortmond, about 60 miles east of the border, although some earlier missions had previously taken the Jugs as far east as the western outskirts of Bremen (south of Oldenburg), where they picked up the returning bombers. Remember, only those groups based on facilities with hard surface runways could use the 108 gallon tank on the belly. Dual wing mounted tanks were not available until late winter due to each P-47 requiring depot level modifications to add the wing hardpoints and plumbing. Only ten could be modified per week and this did not begin until around Christmas of 1943. Less than 100 P-47s were capable of carrying two tanks at the time of the Big Week operation and the locally made 108 gallon tanks were even more rare.

Once the P-47D-25-RE arrived in May, the P-47 now had the range to reach downtown Berlin, although they had zero loiter time (P-51s could loiter for 30-45 minutes).

No one discounted the P-47s during Big Week, in fact I did just the opposite. However, the P-47s did not fly escort to the targets, they had to return shortly after reaching the German border.

Geez Crumpp, you are a dedicated practitioner of obfuscation.

My regards,

Widewing
My regards,

Widewing

YGBSM. Retired Member of Aces High Trainer Corps, Past President of the DFC, retired from flying as Tredlite.

Offline Crumpp

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3671
P38 a super plane?
« Reply #49 on: November 28, 2004, 02:31:48 PM »
Quote
I gave you the source. Here's another: Duel for the Sky by Christopher Shores.


Quote
The same source indicates that 433 flying personnel were killed in February 1944, that 341 were reported missing, and that 277 had been wounded. Preliminary Air Ministry studies based on German records (AHB 6, No. 132 and AHB 6, No. 133) show the following very tentative monthly totals for all theaters:


You need to check your sources again Widewing.  It does NOT list number of Luftwaffe sorties.  It only list number of damaged aircraft and casualties is NOT the same thing.  Perhaps the definition of "sortie" elludes you.


Sorties flown by the USAAF for month of Feb 44 amounts to 10,679.  So your claim that I am confusing sorties flown over 5 days with those flown over the whole is ludicrous.  Again read the material.

Quote
For Big Week ALONE:
Fighter sorties in support of the heavy bomber missions amounted to approximately 2,548 for the Eighth Air Force, 712 for the Ninth, and 413 for the Fifteenth.


I will post some combat reports with P47's over Dusseldorf Germany during Big Week.  

Quote
Furthermore, there were many more than 200 German fighters defending the Reich....


Again you need read what is posted.  No one claimed there were only 200 fighters defending the Reich.  That was the average number available to attack the bombers in the West.  Key words are "average" and "in the west".

Quote
Widewing says:
During "Big Week", the 8th AF put up 3,300 bomber sorties, supported by 1,620 fighter sorties (deep escort). In response, the Luftwaffe put up 4,399 fighter sorties.... Hmm, they don't seem outnumbered by American fighters yet, do they?


Facts are the 8th AF could put more bombers in the air than the Germans had fighters to shoot them down.  That 4000 sorties is crap.  Maybe the entire Luftwaffe put up 4000 sorties that month but certainly not just fighters in the west.  

 
Quote
Idiot...those number are for the P-47D-40-RA, which had a greater internal capacity (65 gallons) and could carry 183 more gallons under the wings and fuselage than the earlier P-47s in service in early 1944.


You need to follow the link.  I think the AF knows what plane it is AND there is a nice picture of it.  The information is clearly labeled P47D-15RE.  Once again you reply and do not read.

Quote
Again, you insist on changing the argument to support your bullsheet. You insist on referring to the entire month of February when the discussion was about a period of 5 days in late February. What's funny is that you cannot see through your own smokescreen.


It has never been about the month of Feb 44 but about Big Week.  The Bullsheet is your creation of the perception P38's went up against the Luftwaffe vastly outnumbered and managed to bring the Luftwaffe to it's knees.
Crumpp

Offline Widewing

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8800
P38 a super plane?
« Reply #50 on: November 28, 2004, 05:41:50 PM »
Snipped redundant junk...Again.

Quote
Originally posted by Crumpp

You need to follow the link.  I think the AF knows what plane it is AND there is a nice picture of it.  The information is clearly labeled P47D-15RE.  Once again you reply and do not read.


LOLOLOLOL! Don't depend upon the USAF Museum for accuracy, they get things wrong as often as not.

The P-47D-15-RE was NOT powered by the PW R2800-59 or -21 engine. This model was powered by the R2800-63, rated at 2,300 hp.

If you look at the Combat radius chart for the P-47D-15-RE (not on the USAF Musum site, but in an actual USAAF printed publication), you will see that the radius of action for this fighter, with one 108 gallon drop tank is 325 miles at 25,000 feet. Of course, P-47s flying with the 8th AF almost always flew at 32,000 feet. The added climb could reduce the combat radius down to around 300 miles. Once again, this excludes time required for group assembly.

Dusseldorf was just 30 miles inside Germany and I've already stated that P-47s reached Dortmund, which is another 20 miles deeper into Germany. So, your combat reports will only serve to prove what I already stated. In lieu of your obvious confusion, I suggest that you find and download a map of wartime Germany to avoid future errors.

 
Quote

It has never been about the month of Feb 44 but about Big Week.  The Bullsheet is your creation of the perception P38's went up against the Luftwaffe vastly outnumbered and managed to bring the Luftwaffe to it's knees.
Crumpp


Now you are showing the true colors of a dedicated liar. I never stated any such thing. Previously, you merely twisted facts to suit your argument. Now you have resorted to bold-faced fabrication. Why am I not surprised?  Oh, and you have repeatedly referred to total sorties for the entire month of February, ignoring the fact that most of these had nothing to due with Big Week.

Face it Crumpp, you have, as usual, argued yourself into a box, and once trapped you lie like cheap rug to disguise your own nonsense.

I'll take my cue from other posters and I won't waste anymore time with you either.

Widewing
My regards,

Widewing

YGBSM. Retired Member of Aces High Trainer Corps, Past President of the DFC, retired from flying as Tredlite.

Offline Crumpp

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3671
P38 a super plane?
« Reply #51 on: November 28, 2004, 07:15:48 PM »
Quote
radius of action for this fighter, with one 108 gallon drop tank is 325 miles at 25,000 feet.  


More crap your peddling.  Please post that source because it shows up NOWHERE ELSE.

The P47D-15 could mount drop tanks and the P 47D-22 would have been the model in service in Feb '44 AFAIK.

http://www.xs4all.nl/~fbonne/warbirds/ww2htmls/repup47.html#repup471

http://www.aviation-history.com/republic/p47.html

http://home.att.net/~jbaugher1/p47_4.html

Even the P47B had a range of 1100 miles....

Quote
So, your combat reports will only serve to prove what I already stated. In lieu of your obvious confusion, I suggest that you find and download a map of wartime Germany to avoid future errors.


Ok let me try and nail your squirmy agrument down.

First you claim the Luftwaffe flew more sorties than the USAAF and confuse sorties with casualties:

Quote
Widewing says proof of Luftwaffe sorties is here:

The same source indicates that 433 flying personnel were killed in February 1944, that 341 were reported missing, and that 277 had been wounded. Preliminary Air Ministry studies based on German records (AHB 6, No. 132 and AHB 6, No. 133) show the following very tentative monthly totals for all theaters:


Then you say the USAAF flew less sorties than the Luftwaffe:

 
Quote
Widewing says:
During "Big Week", the 8th AF put up 3,300 bomber sorties, supported by 1,620 fighter sorties (deep escort). In response, the Luftwaffe put up 4,399 fighter sorties.... Hmm, they don't seem outnumbered by American fighters yet, do they?


Then you claim that I keep refering to the total number of FIGHTER sorties from this document showing the absolute numerical superiority of the USAAF in 1944.



In fact Widewing it has been mentioned numerous times from the USAAF own combat reports:

http://paul.rutgers.edu/~mcgrew/wwii/usaf/html/Feb.44.html

That your claim is WRONG.  During Big Week the FIGHTERS of the USAAF flew:

Quote
Fighter sorties in support of the heavy bomber missions amounted to approximately 2,548 for the Eighth Air Force, 712 for the Ninth, and 413 for the Fifteenth.


This is not these few groups Widewing claims:

Quote
Fact: Prior to March of 1944, the 8th AF could put no more than5 groups of fighters  over the Reich, less than 200 fighters. Get used to this, its not going to change.




But from:

 
Quote
17 groups in all--13 P-47, 2 P-38, and 2 P-51--drawn from both VIII Fighter Command and the Ninth Air Force. In addition to these American escort groups, the RAF provided 16 fighter squadrons, consisting of Spitfires and Mustangs.11


Hardly the picture of P38's left all alone to take on the Luftwaffe vastly outnumbered.

Quote
Dusseldorf was just 30 miles inside Germany and I've already stated that P-47s reached Dortmund, which is another 20 miles deeper into Germany.


So the P47's could reach around the "E" on this map:



Looks like they could escort quite a ways into Germany.

 
Quote
Crumpp says:
It has never been about the month of Feb 44 but about Big Week. The Bullsheet is your creation of the perception P38's went up against the Luftwaffe vastly outnumbered and managed to bring the Luftwaffe to it's knees.




Quote
Widewing reply:
Now you are showing the true colors of a dedicated liar. I never stated any such thing. Previously, you merely twisted facts to suit your argument. Now you have resorted to bold-faced fabrication.


BS.  Just like your "I didn't offer excuses...crap" now you backpedal when your argument is proven false.  Pathetic. You say it right here very much watered down from your intitial claims:

Quote
Widewing says:
Crumpp, those 50 fighters had to defend 600 bombers extending over a huge area. Usually, they flew by squadron, rarely able to provide mutual support. They were always out-numbered by the defensive fighters. That's fact, not myth.


And your inititial garbage:

Quote
Widewings says:
One last factor. Only two Groups of P-38s were available in December of 1943, the 20th and the 55th. While they had a total strength of 70-80 fighters between them, usually only about 60 were available for any given mission. Of these, 15%-20% would be aborts. It was rare for both Groups to get more than a total of 50 fighters into enemy airspace. Facing these 50 fighters were 200-400 Luftwaffe fighters. Yet, despite all the problems, this small group of P-38s not only killed more than they lost, they reduced bomber losses by 50%


The guys that took off everyday and did destroy the Luftwaffe had a tough and dangerous task.  Many times to them it must have seemed they were outnumbered.  When you look out of your cockpit and all you see is bad guys, it matters little how many friendlies are "nearby".  There is no reason though to distort the truth.  Their actions stand alone and don't need any hype or half-truths to highlight them.

Crumpp

Offline MiloMorai

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6863
P38 a super plane?
« Reply #52 on: November 28, 2004, 08:28:18 PM »

Offline Crumpp

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3671
P38 a super plane?
« Reply #53 on: November 28, 2004, 08:54:24 PM »
Nice Chart.  Thanks for posting it.

Crumpp

Offline Widewing

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8800
P38 a super plane?
« Reply #54 on: November 29, 2004, 12:55:50 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by MiloMorai


Is it me Milo, or is this huckleberry just entirely confused?

He points to websites that state a range of about 800 miles for the P-47D, pre -25 model. Of course, he overlooks that maximum range is one direction only. He also overlooks that fuel is consumed climbing to altitude, assembly of the force and any fuel used during warm-up and takeoff. He also ignores that the AAF generated its charts based upon 5 minutes at combat power, 15 minutes at MIL power and a 30 minutes reserve. All of which cut into range. So, if we factor in all fuel usage and cut the remaining range in half, we have the Combat Radius of the aircraft. In this case, it is between 300 and 325 miles. Barely enough to cross beyond the Ruhr river, assuming that they have been able to use the entire contents of the 108 gallon tank (which actually had a usable content of 104 gallons). If the tank had to be jettisoned, what percentage remained must be removed from the maximum combat radius.

Total Fuel:
305 gallons internal (265 applied to combat radius)
108 gallons external (104 usable)
-----
413 gallons (369 usable)

Cross index the available fuel, less climbout, combat use and reserve and you end up with 300 miles +/- 25 miles depending upon power settings at cruise (which will vary according to the rendezvous time with the bombers, and whether or not the escort and/or the bombers are on schedule or course).

But then again, what do I know? I only have over 1,100 hours flying military aircraft powered by the R2800 engine (and another 1,200+ hours in Wright R1820 powered aircraft). I suppose I must surrender any experience to the ground-bound desk pilots and their infinite base of real knowledge garnered from the internet. There used to be quite a few WWII combat vets posting to various forums and usenet. Almost all stopped because of the the constant arguments from know-it-all desk jockies who would claim that what these fighter and bomber vets saw and did was not possible or flew in the face of what Joe Blow wrote in some half-assed book they found on the discount rack at Barnes & Noble. Yes, it's a strange world.

My regards,

Widewing
My regards,

Widewing

YGBSM. Retired Member of Aces High Trainer Corps, Past President of the DFC, retired from flying as Tredlite.

Offline bunch

  • Parolee
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 636
      • http://hitechcreations.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?&forumid=17
P38 a super plane?
« Reply #55 on: November 29, 2004, 01:55:29 AM »
Widewing, were you flying the B-17 i saw near the Statue of Liberty Sept. 25?

Offline BUG_EAF322

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3153
      • http://bug322.startje.com
P38 a super plane?
« Reply #56 on: November 29, 2004, 02:31:49 AM »
Love it to see these ignorant luftwabble players , they go so up in their german crap i think they believe they gonna earn the iron cross again.

Even the japanese where ignorant to the p38 they thought they killed alot of them

Just as the germans they couldn't accept they where beaten by a twin engined plane

the shame factor is big amongst fighter pilots.

Offline MiloMorai

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6863
P38 a super plane?
« Reply #57 on: November 29, 2004, 03:09:54 AM »
Another chart, care of Zeno's




In another thread someone posted a combat range graph for the Fw190. Anyone remember this? It was nothing like what the A-8 Handbook has for range. Can they post a link for it?

Widewing
e-mail me at miloshmm@hotmail.com for I have some questions for you.

Offline Crumpp

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3671
P38 a super plane?
« Reply #58 on: November 29, 2004, 04:50:10 AM »
You mean something like this:



Got over 20 pages for different altitudes and setups.

Quote
Almost all stopped because of the the constant arguments from know-it-all desk jockies who would claim that what these fighter and bomber vets saw and did was not possible or flew in the face of what Joe Blow wrote in some half-assed book they found on the discount rack at Barnes & Noble. Yes, it's a strange world.


Knucklehead,  I know the difference between combat radius and max range.  I also work with Warbirds on the side as well.  I don't fly them but run the membership and help out with the restoration.  Your attempting to argue semantics.

You post is somewhat confusing.  If your a WWII vet, then I thank you for service.  You guys did nothing less than save the world.  

However as a combat veteran myself (Army) I will point out that even battles that you are present for does not mean your an expert on the entire front or even that battle.  I am still learning details of events that occurred in the some of the fights even from years ago.  One man, big battlefield which can be a very confusing place.

Looking at the facts:

Your wrong about the Luftwaffe outnumbering the USAAF.
The USAAF could put more bombers than the Luftwaffe had fighters to shoot them down.  The Luftwaffe was just not a very big force in relation to forces arrayed against it.

The P47 could and did escort into Germany. Nobody ever claimed it went to Berlin.  In fact it was until March that any USAAF fighters went to Berlin.

The perception you have created of 50 P38's vs 200 Luftwaffe fighters is flat out WRONG.  If you say you were there and saw it yourself, I encourage you to participate in the Library of Congress program to record veterans experience because this is news.  I will ask several of our B17 and B24 veterans what they have to say as well.

If you will bother to pull out a map of Europe you will see the COMBAT RADIUS of the P47 ends in the location I marked on the Operation Argument Target Map above.

Crumpp
« Last Edit: November 29, 2004, 06:54:03 AM by Crumpp »

Offline MiloMorai

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6863
P38 a super plane?
« Reply #59 on: November 29, 2004, 06:36:01 AM »
No Crumpp it was more of a sketch. Thanks for the graph.