Author Topic: Question to Finns  (Read 29648 times)

Offline lazs2

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24886
Question to Finns
« Reply #585 on: March 22, 2005, 03:23:58 PM »
we had no trouble saving pow's lives.... we certainly didn't lose allmost a third of em!  

No reflection on your relatives... I don't blame the russian people.

I have no doubt your relative did his best under the circustances.

and... if the war was over... why were they even POW's?

lazs

Offline Nekto

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 47
Question to Finns
« Reply #586 on: March 22, 2005, 03:35:13 PM »
Because they turn our land into desert. Tens of millions Soviets were killed. So they had to rebuild cities, factories etc.  I see nothing wrong with it. Considering the damage I think they should be doing this job for all their life to their end. But our government was too  gentle.

Offline bikekil

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2038
Question to Finns
« Reply #587 on: March 22, 2005, 03:49:28 PM »
Now Poland should capture some of the Russians (as Russia is successor of the Soviet Union of course) and make them prisoners in a work camps till the end of them lifes... because of over 40 years of communism here :rofl this is too funy

Offline Raven_2

  • Parolee
  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 247
Question to Finns
« Reply #588 on: March 22, 2005, 04:35:44 PM »
to straffo

Square in memory of Dudaev is equal to the monument to Ben-Laden. He was murder, there are thousands of innocent people deaths associated with this name in Russia. France now praise murdering? This is a sad fact.

In Chechnia goes war. But Dudaev actions were terroristic, not military. Or you think Beslan kids deathes are equal to deaths of armed, zealous, terroristic band killed in urban fight? C`mon, say it: "I think that Beslan was generaly a good thing and perfect way for Czechen people to fight with Russian bastards. This act of bravery from Czechen terrorists side in Beslan must be praised in centuries by all of the civilized world."

to lsaz2

>>ok... this isn't making any sense to me. "official" russian documents show that stalin only executed 3/4 of a million people but the entire rest of the world believes it to be between 10-20 million? could it bwe somewhere inbetween?

Yep. 20 millions people were *sentenced* during Stalin rule. Somewhere in your history book writed something like this: "There were 20.000.000 of people, sentenced to death, prison or deportation during Stalin rule". Someone of your journalists read that, misinterpretate and wrote in newspaper something like: "There were 20.000.000 of *political enemies*, sentenced to death, prison or deportation during Stalin rule". Some other journalists read this newspaper and say on TV something like : "There were 20.000.000 of *political enemies*, sentenced to *death* during Stalin rule". See now? The number is here, but it was mistranslated. Two words changed, opposite sense now.

JFYK: there ~14.000.000 people being arrested in USA every year, > 2.000.000 sentenced.

>>and... 1 million or one third of german POW's died undrer this gentle regiem? that much was admitted.... the world believes much more.

You see: there were only one accident of murdering people in Katyn - stil unproved by court - and whole world blame Soviet about it. C`mon, if Soviets shot German PoWs during WW2 - you already know about it with whole details :-)

1 million of Germans (it comes by memory, according to Nekto, number is much lesser) died becase of lack of food and illness. Most of food were growing in the western part of Russia and it was occupied by Germans.

About indians. Why you give them cloth desised by smallpox, then?
« Last Edit: March 22, 2005, 04:44:45 PM by Raven_2 »

Offline genozaur

  • Parolee
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 562
Question to Finns
« Reply #589 on: March 22, 2005, 09:05:10 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by bikekil
On Gen,

You'd like to sound like a well educated in Polish history, so let me quote you
 "Do not fool yourself with the ONLY Polish government sitting on their high stools in London and "electing" an idiot for the Prime Minister in exile."

Was it or was it not an only Polish goverment at the time? You can call Sikorki a fool, your choice, for me it's a hero who said what should be said, but i don't have to force you to feel the same. If i were him, i would declere a War and call Stalin an idiot.... but earlier then he did :D...

"Your government (before it fled abroad) and the Commander-in-Chief ( before Sikorski) were wise enough not to declare the war on the Soviet Union even when the armed border conflict between the Red Army and Polish border guards was in progress."

First of all, unfortunatelly for you i know pretty much about that attack because my grandpa fought with the Soviets there and i have to assure you - he was not in a border guard. It was a no less and no more then a war. Saying it was a kind of a border conflict is a sign of a great arrogance, great ignorance or... i won't insult you... or just a lack of knowledge :) but still, my first question is waiting for an answer - do you think that after Soviets attack our lands on 17.IX.1939 we had to declare the war with them? In my opinion Soviets already declared the was by attacking our lands without declering a war... soulnd cowardly to me if you ask me... but hey... they were sneaky snealy huh? ;) Ever heard of Ribbentrop - Molotow pact? Still saying it was a border conflict after which Soviets were supposed to het half of our lands? Isn't it too much for a border conflict? :) Now that's foolish

To answer the rest of it. If you read my earlier posts you would see me admitin the crimes on the Sovied POW's capturen in Poland. So you would finally find one Pole who admits it and saying "i'm sorry" about it :)
But hey, you are so well educated - you know better :)

Let me tell you how it is. There is a big issue about Polish - Ukrainian crimes. It's a probably topic for another thread but let me assure you. In Polish TV you will find a lot of documentary movies about the Polish crimes on Ukraine. I'm not a TV maniac but seen at least 10 during the last year. DOn't be fooled, Ukrainians executed and murdered a lot of Poles there too, but the point is - i would be more then happy if in Ukraine people could see that much about their crimes in that conflict (hard to call it other then that) as we in Poland see about ours in our TV. That's the great thiung IMO and i hope to see more of it, so i was not so arrogant dick who knonws only about the crimes done by his neighbours and not by his own people.
Other than that, i believe we can live in peace and friendship with Ukraine as it apeared lately... and which was as it apeared a salt in Russian eye, don't you think? ;)

As for Pilsudski, a lot of people in Poland call him a hero. I say it's pretty risky, but i also think he did a lot of good for Poland. It's hard to make people think and talk about his crimes on the Soviet POW's as the best know part of Polish- Bolshevick war here is a "Miracle over Vistula" where Red Army was stopped and pushed back. That's why we call him a hero... but you are right, we should also speak about his crimes and i hope we will, no matter what your take on Katyn is :)


OK, Bik,
#) I thought it's obvious from my appreciation of the wise decision of Polish government (real GOVERNMENT of Poland on Polish territories before 17.IX.1939)) and the direct order of the Polish Commander-in-Chief (before Sikorski) :
NOT TO DECLARE WAR ON THE SOVIET UNION,
but limit the armed conflict between the USSR and Poland to the BORDER CONFLICT using only the Polish border guard troops -  that's what I also would have done if I were trained in the art of diplomacy.
Your brave grandfather who fought (in the Polish Army, I guess ?) against the Soviet Red Army did it in violation of the direct order of the Polish Commander-in-Chief.

#) There were NO POLISH GOVERNMENT after 17.IX.1939 because Romania agreed to accept the presence on her territory of only private Polish citizens but NOT THE POLISH GOVERNMENT (!), and the members of the Polish government agreed to their status of private Polish citizens. Later on the members of the FORMER POLISH GOVERNMENT assembled in London and PROCLAIMED THEMSELVES ' POLISH GOVERNMENT IN EXILE' (a diplomatic term denoting the status of the former government which is still claiming to be a legitimate governing body). So, there were NO POLISH GOVERNMENT but there was the POLISH GOVERNMENT IN EXILE.

#) To the so-called "Ribbentrop - Molotov pact" there were made in September and October of 1939 important changes by Hitler and Stalin, so
that instead of "half of our [Polish] lands" (as you said) the Soviet Union received only the internationally accepted ('Lord Curson line') territories of Western Belorussia and Western Ukraine (Belorussia and Ukraine were the constituent republics of the USSR).
 Now you can address your claims to the newly independent republics of Belorussia and Ukraine.

#) My congratulations, you are the first Polak that I know who admits Polish crimes against Soviet POWs.  

#) About heroic Pilsudski.
One of my colleagues, a Polak, called Pilsudski
Quote
"Polish Hitler".

#) About Ukrainian crimes against Polish people.
Because the Ukrainians were treated as slaves by the Poles for several centuries, it's no wonder that the slave revolts were far from the duel between gentlemen. Still, the final atrocities in this fight were commited by the Polish side ('Operation Visla' in 1947).

Offline genozaur

  • Parolee
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 562
Question to Finns
« Reply #590 on: March 22, 2005, 09:12:16 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Boroda
Again - Red side disagrees on the scales of what dr. Goebbels called "purges". (It's intersting to know origin of some newspeak terms, isn't it?)

JFYI: most of the time when Stalin was in power there was no death penalty in USSR. It was "reintroduced" after the War, mostly for war criminals.

Soviet statistics on GULAG population is de-classified now. It's interesting. I said many times that Russia with it's 150 million population in 1999 had 2 million people in prisons and camps, while at the worst year of "Stalin's repressions", 1940, USSR with the same population had almost 2 times less prisoners. Is it one of the reasons West loves Yeltsin so much? :confused:


Boroda, as far as I remember the USA also has in her jails about two million people.
It's like Russia and USA are still competing for the first place. :rolleyes:

Offline genozaur

  • Parolee
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 562
Question to Finns
« Reply #591 on: March 22, 2005, 09:30:20 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by lazs2
Ok... so how many political enemies has yeltsin executed so far?

lazs


I do not know the number of political enemies executed on Yeltsin's orders, but during Yeltsin's "democratic revolution" armed Yeltsinists in military uniforms stormed the White House (the seat of the parliament of Russia) using tank fire support killing up to a thousand people including members of parliament.
It's worth noting that fearing the criminal prosecution, Yeltsin before stepping down from power insisted on the parliamentary approval of his immunity from the prosecution. And he got it just as did his father-in-law in Chile (that general whose name starts with 'Pinoc'...).
Looks like both these "gentlemen" were consulted
by the same American lawyer.

Offline genozaur

  • Parolee
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 562
Question to Finns
« Reply #592 on: March 22, 2005, 09:35:15 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Fishu
Why to uselessly kill good working force? just send them to the labor camps and work them to the death, much more useful.
Also makes the statistics look nicer.

Same with the prisoners, just send unwanted people somewhere where nobody wants to go and call the place as a rehabilitation camp or similar.

Doesn't make the things any better in my eyes.
There are many ways to kill and punish people, it is not always the direct action.


You're right on this one, Fish.
Sorry for my French in the previous post to you.
:D

Offline genozaur

  • Parolee
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 562
Question to Finns
« Reply #593 on: March 22, 2005, 09:47:24 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Toad
I doubt the "MUCH" part but there's no doubt they committed equally barbarous crimes.

The DIFFERENCE is that the OTHER countries ADMIT they did it. The OTHER countries are not in DENIAL.

BIG DIFFERENCE. Sort of indicates which countries may do stuff like that again.


Toad, have you just missed the stats posted by Raven. See above. It's from the report to Khrushchev.

Offline genozaur

  • Parolee
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 562
Question to Finns
« Reply #594 on: March 22, 2005, 10:44:29 PM »
Originally posted by Toad
Quote

Yep. It's not the "new world masters" that are trying to change it though. It's the old world tyrants, enslavers and barbarians that never learned it or admitted their deeds that are the problem.


"Death missions?" Hardly. Mostly just cruising 20 miles off the Soviet coastline plotting where you'd moved your air defense radars to since the last time we flew by. Best part was watching your PVO Strany pilots struggling to fly formation with an airliner with the autopilot on.

Getting shot by a missle never worried us. We knew you guys always used fighters to murder people on aircraft in International Airspace. The greatest danger from your fighters was from them being unable to fly formation.

I was never scared we'd be shot down but there were a lot of times I was scared some bozo with little flying experience or skill was going to run into us. [END OF QUOTE]

Toad, if you are trying to hint at the Korean airliner used by the CIA and the USAF as a spy plane full of civillian hostages, you are dead wrong on that.
I served in the PVO Strany for a year. And I vividly remember the corridors with the walls covered with photos of PVO heros who were awarded with medals from the Soviet government for securing the safe landings of foreign aircraft that strayed for some reason into the Soviet airspace.
I even remember that "filthy" Soviet propaganda glorified only the cases involving civilian passenger planes. I was impressed with the case of a stray airliner which was helped with the landing on a frozen lake somewhere in southern Siberia. A bunch of ordinary Soviet soldiers received battle medals for saving people's lives.
So don't force-feed everybody once again with the American propaganda slogans of the Cold War era about "Russian barbarians". I already had a word with you about this term ("barbarians") which is the propaganda label since the times of so funky-gloriuos Roman Empire.
But let me continue with the "KAL-007".
If you dig a quater-inch deeper into the literature published in the United States of America, you'll easily find out that the chief pilot on this flight was a CIA-paid guy, and parallel to "KAL" was flying (but outside the Soviet airspace though twice closer than you did) a true American spy plane, with the American spy satellite right above them all.
And if you pay me for my ticket out of these states (that's what Nuke offered me because he does not like my tongue), I will tell you the names ... I mean the makes of the American spy plane and the satellite. But probably you know it without my paid lip service.


:D

Offline genozaur

  • Parolee
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 562
Question to Finns
« Reply #595 on: March 22, 2005, 11:55:12 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by lazs2
ok... this isn't making any sense to me.   "official" russian documents show that stalin only executed 3/4 of a million people but the entire rest of the world believes it to be between 10-20 million?   could it bwe somewhere inbetween?

and... 1 million or one third of german POW's died undrer this gentle regiem?  that much was admitted.... the world believes much more.

Now... the horrible American genocide of the indians... We were at war.   we killed them and they killed us.   They had no respect for civilians and indeed, targeted em as did we.   If you read about those times you will find that in allmost every case it was the indians that broke the early treaties.   And... we were playing by their rules.. their rules were... the strongest tribe gets the land.

as for riots... do you know how many people our government has killed in riots over the last half century?  care to guess?

lazs


Laz, allow me to make my remarks on the above-said.

The 3/5 of a million people executed can easily be not a correct number because, as one of the Russian guys has mentioned here about his close relative, there was also an unannounced officially number of people sentenced to inprisonment "without the right for correspondence" (bez prava na perepisku). All these people were effectively sent to the death row, some of them executed immediately. Though the formal verdict was so and so years "bez prava na perepisku".
So, the total number of executed people may be higher that it was reported to Khrushchev.
But I doubt that it can be 10 million (i.e. half of Western "calculations"). In this Western number of 20 million the propagandistic trick of engrossing enemy's faults is obvious.
But still I thank Raven for his efforts to straighten up this discussion and provide us with 'Khrushchev's' numbers of Stalin's cruelties.

About German POWs.
Most of those captured near Stalingrad were very little of the living creatures : unattended wounds, severe frostbites, infectious deseases.
I guess not many of them could survive for long.
The Bundesrepublik of Deutschland pressured by the Western powers never signed a Peace Treaty with the Soviet Union, so irrespectively of the capitulation of the Nazi Germany's Armed  Forces, the state of the war between Germany and the USSR continued till the last day of the Soviet Union. This is the main reason why Stalin kept German POWs in Soviet custody for 10 years.

Strange thing about the genocide of the Native Americans is that modern Americans justify it because at those times the US government "played by their [Amerindians'] rules": cruelty overpowered by more forceful cruelty.
And at the same time the Chechen terrorists should be treated humanely ? Nice American doublespeak !

Offline Nekto

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 47
Question to Finns
« Reply #596 on: March 23, 2005, 12:43:34 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by genozaur
The 3/5 of a million people executed can easily be not a correct number because, as one of the Russian guys has mentioned here about his close relative, there was also an unannounced officially number of people sentenced to inprisonment "without the right for correspondence" (bez prava na perepisku). All these people were effectively sent to the death row, some of them executed immediately. Though the formal verdict was so and so years "bez prava na perepisku".

No, I think, you are not right there. "10 years without the right for correspondence" it was just what relatives were told. My grandmother recieved the official letter with these words about her brother. He was executed in 1937. And I saw his name in the list to be executed. http://stalin.memo.ru/images/intro.htm (in Russian).

So, I think the whole numbers of executed are correct.
« Last Edit: March 23, 2005, 02:30:57 AM by Nekto »

Offline Raven_2

  • Parolee
  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 247
Question to Finns
« Reply #597 on: March 23, 2005, 01:15:26 AM »
to Nekto

Ты чего, из "врагв народа" что ли? За что у тебя половина родственников осуждена была?

Offline Nekto

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 47
Question to Finns
« Reply #598 on: March 23, 2005, 01:25:05 AM »
Raven_2
Я, вроде, сказал про одного...
За что -  не знаю. У меня нет доступа к материалам следствия.

Raven I don't think it's correct to write in Russian here. It's an english-language forum yet. :D
« Last Edit: March 23, 2005, 01:45:11 AM by Nekto »

Offline bikekil

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2038
Question to Finns
« Reply #599 on: March 23, 2005, 02:26:44 AM »
"#) I thought it's obvious from my appreciation of the wise decision of Polish government (real GOVERNMENT of Poland on Polish territories before 17.IX.1939)) and the direct order of the Polish Commander-in-Chief (before Sikorski) :
NOT TO DECLARE WAR ON THE SOVIET UNION,
but limit the armed conflict between the USSR and Poland to the BORDER CONFLICT using only the Polish border guard troops - that's what I also would have done if I were trained in the art of diplomacy.
Your brave grandfather who fought (in the Polish Army, I guess ?) against the Soviet Red Army did it in violation of the direct order of the Polish Commander-in-Chief."


and you still call it a border conflict? sorry, Red Army invader my country and took a great share of the land. Polish Army (not only a border guard) fought with them (as my grandpa did and i'm very proud of him). It's obvious that as a soldier he was following his orders. This point you made insulting even my sense of humor... so i don't see any point in continuing the thread (on my side anyway) about Soviet invasion on 17.IX.1939 if it was a border conflict for you :) Live with your dreams :)

"#) There were NO POLISH GOVERNMENT after 17.IX.1939 because Romania agreed to accept the presence on her territory of only private Polish citizens but NOT THE POLISH GOVERNMENT (!), and the members of the Polish government agreed to their status of private Polish citizens. Later on the members of the FORMER POLISH GOVERNMENT assembled in London and PROCLAIMED THEMSELVES ' POLISH GOVERNMENT IN EXILE' (a diplomatic term denoting the status of the former government which is still claiming to be a legitimate governing body). So, there were NO POLISH GOVERNMENT but there was the POLISH GOVERNMENT IN EXILE."

happened that this goverment that according to your claim was not a Polish goverment (or at least had no right to be) was respected by ALL or the Allier countries (including Soviets) and also this goverment were commanding 4th biggest military power at the later stage of the WW2 (after Soviets, Americans, and GB). Sorry, but whatever you will say, those were not a bunch of guys from nowhere who just sit their bottoms in London :)

"#) To the so-called "Ribbentrop - Molotov pact" there were made in September and October of 1939 important changes by Hitler and Stalin, so
that instead of "half of our [Polish] lands" (as you said) the Soviet Union received only the internationally accepted ('Lord Curson line') territories of Western Belorussia and Western Ukraine (Belorussia and Ukraine were the constituent republics of the USSR).
Now you can address your claims to the newly independent republics of Belorussia and Ukraine. "


See, i have no claims to this lands, butr please quite the point where i said i have nay claims to it? Still can't find it? that's what i thought. :) Belorussia and Ukraine have his lands and i'm very happy about it. I refered to the Ribbentrop-Molotov pact couintering your funny theory about border conflict :) Face it, Soviets attacked Poland on 17.IX.1939 (cowardly, without declaring a war) and Sovets wanted to grab some lands who actually were a Polish lands. Of course, the border was never agreed between Poles and Soviets, but you know what? Now it's the same between Poland and Germany, because after WW2 Stalin forced a new borders for our country and "Allies" accepted... do you see any reason for us to attack germans or opposite? Please say so, so i could laugh some more :)

#) My congratulations, you are the first Polak that I know who admits Polish crimes against Soviet POWs.

#) About heroic Pilsudski.
One of my colleagues, a Polak, called Pilsudski
Quote
"Polish Hitler". [/b]

A powewr of democracy can do a miracles huh? :) I'm not the only one who knows about crimes of Pilsudski (there were more POW's killed by him then by the Soviets in Katyn (but if you add the Syberia ;) ). I'm far from calling him a Hitler, but he surely is responsible for a lot of human beings... right after Hitler and Stalin... and probably many more. Anyway... power of democracy. freedom of speech - know what it is?

"#) About Ukrainian crimes against Polish people..."
From what i know both sides appologised for his crimes and that's the good start... hopefully.