Author Topic: Religious question for Christians  (Read 1870 times)

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Religious question for Christians
« Reply #60 on: May 06, 2005, 09:22:56 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by StarOfAfrica2
Children don't go to hell because they dont understand the difference between right and wrong.  They are innocents.



now that's a b.s. loophole.  those little bastards should burn in hell right along with us adults.


ack-ack
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline GREENTENERAL

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 153
Religious question for Christians
« Reply #61 on: May 06, 2005, 09:39:24 PM »
One summer, when I was 14, a bunch of friends and I decided to play a game called "Dungeons & Dragons".  The players manual was about an inch thick with alot of pictures.  After a few weeks, I lost interest in playing that game because no one could agree on the rules.  When I got older, I noticed that that scenario was going on everywhere, and the books were even bigger.

storch

  • Guest
Religious question for Christians
« Reply #62 on: May 06, 2005, 09:58:25 PM »
Inflammatory
« Last Edit: May 09, 2005, 02:25:43 PM by Skuzzy »

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Religious question for Christians
« Reply #63 on: May 06, 2005, 10:25:35 PM »
Personal attack
« Last Edit: May 09, 2005, 02:25:58 PM by Skuzzy »
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline Seagoon

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2396
      • http://www.providencepca.com
Re: Religious question for Christians
« Reply #64 on: May 07, 2005, 01:28:19 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Vulcan
OK heres one for you:

Assuming there is a god, a christian one at that, should he live by his own principles/commands set down in the 10 commandments?

If so, how does his actions during the great flood and the smiting of sodom and the  one I can't spell reflect on this? Would Mary count as being a "coveted wife"?

I'm interested to hear the christian view on this.


Hi Vulcan,

I must admit to not having read any of the other posts on this thread yet, so please accept my apologies if all of this has been said before. I'm sick as a dog and had intended to get to bed after finishing up my sermon, but I said to myself, "I'll just do a quick scan of the O'Club titles and... then there was this hook in my mouth so, what could I do?

Again, here I'm going to smash a lot of principles flat for the sake of brevity. Books could and have been written on the subject you are approaching - i.e. the Law of God.

From a biblical point of view though, the fundamental premises of the question are wrong. Let me try to explain what I mean. Again, I am speaking as a Christian theist answering from a biblical worldview, I know this won't satisfy atheists, but I hope it will at least be intelligible (my mind is real fuzzy at present).

God is the Creator, originator, and sustainer of everything. There is nothing above him, he is the source of all things. There are no "brute facts" or laws natural or otherwise that existed before him or are independent of him.  

However, remember that God is perfectly holy, perfectly wise, perfectly just, and perfectly good. All of these characteristics find their essence in him, and in so far as anything else can be described as "good", it is as a reflection of his own original and perfect goodness.

As God's creation, man was originally made in God's image (unlike anything else in creation) and as such he correctly reflected God's communicable attributes - i.e. things like knowledge, righteousness, and holiness as opposed to incommunicable attributes like omnipresence, omnipotence, etc.

Now what is God's Law in it's essence? It is an application of the perfect holiness of God to the life of man. It is divided into two tables: the first 4 commandments expressing man's duty to God, and the next 6 expressing man's duty to his fellow man. We see this division spelled out by Jesus in his summarization of the commandments into two laws: " 'And you shall love the LORD your God with all your heart, with all your soul, with all your mind, and with all your strength.' This is the first commandment. "And the second, like it, is this: 'You shall love your neighbor as yourself.'

The particular commandments themselves answer the "how" question, "how do I love the Lord my God in regard to my use of his name?" (see Commandment 3) or if we were to ask "how do I love my neighbor in regards to whether to lie or tell the truth?" (See commandment nine). To obey the commandments was to obey God's laws for the life, faith, and practice of man and thus live a life that reflected the image of God and obeyed His commandment to "Be holy, for I am holy."

In his original unfallen state in the Garden, man was able to do this. Adam was originally capable of obeying the law perfectly. But unlike God, who does not change (he is immutable) Adam was created mutable, and by his choice he chose to sin by disobeying God. After he sinned, he fell, was cursed and became dead in sin (Eph. 2:1) and after that it became impossible for men to perfectly keep the Law of God (Rom. 8:7).

What is sin? Disobeying God's law either by commission or ommission. The wages of Sin is death - in other words, God's righteous judment for disobeying his law should be death, both physical and eternal. God would have been justified by condemning all men to hell at that point. But God instead of giving all men perfect justice, elected to give some mercy instead of the justice they deserved. In order for this to happen, someone would have to stand in the place of fallen man and pay the penalty for their transgressions, and not only that but keep the law on their behalf. Only God Himself could offer up the perfect sacrifice necessary to atone for the sins of man, and only he could keep the law on the behalf of fallen sinners and give his own righteousness to them as a gift. Which is exactly what the Bible tells us that Jesus, the Second person of the Trinity came into the world to do:

1 "And she will bring forth a Son, and you shall call His name JESUS, for He will save His people from their sins."(Mat. 1:21)

"This is a faithful saying and worthy of all acceptance, that Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners, of whom I am chief." (1 Tim. 1:15)

Now as far as the Flood and the Amalekite massacre were concerned, God was not murdering (which is what the 6th commandment forbids) any more than a judge commits murder when he sentences the convicted murderer to death. All those who died in the flood and in the Amalekite massacre had sinned (and for instance, in the case of the Amalekites these sins involved things like child sacrifice) they stood already condemned, and God simply brought forward the beginning of their sentence. This punishment was just and well-deserved, and helpful to us as well because in the perfect justice of God we see the mercy of God in offering forgiveness through the sacrifice of his Son which is the heart of the Gospel beautifully highlighted and the plea to embrace it and be reconciled to God made all the more urgent.

William Tyndale, the 15 century English Reformer, Preacher, and Bible Translator put it beautifuly when he said:

"Expound the law truly, and open the veil of Moses, to condemn all flesh, and prove all men sinners, and all deeds under the law, before mercy have taken away the condemnation thereof, to be sin, and damnable; and then as a faithful minister, set abroach the mercy of our Lord Jesus, and let the wounded consciences drink of the water of him."

- SEAGOON
SEAGOON aka Pastor Andy Webb
"We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion... Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other." - John Adams

Offline Silat

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2536
Religious question for Christians
« Reply #65 on: May 07, 2005, 01:54:21 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Vulcan
Were there not innocents in Sodom and Gomora, and during the great flood? It always seemed to me that someone with "god powers" took some pretty broadsweeps. In in those sweeps I'm sure there were "innocents", which means in essence god must have committed murder. Which throws the whole semantic definition of "thou shalt not kill" argument out the window.

And then theres sending people to be judged. I understood God judged you when you died and ended up outside the pearly gates. That your actions on earth decided your fate. And that bad people like Stalin, Pol Pot, and Hitler didn't get smited because thats not the way it works - ie they do their time on earth then get judged by god.

Yet in direct contradiction to this we have god smiting the entire planet, cities, and odd individuals from time to time.

I also don't get the whole flood the earth, nuke a couple of cities to start again then later when his people go off the rails a 3rd time he sends his son whom he sacrifices. Don't know about you but the god seems a little fast to pass the buck and let others take the fall for failures in his grand design.

Sometimes this christian god sounds just a little to "human" to me, to many flaws ;)


Obviously he is a she :D
+Silat
"The first time someone shows you who they are, believe them." — Maya Angelou
"Conservatism offers no redress for the present, and makes no preparation for the future." B. Disraeli
"All that serves labor serves the nation. All that harms labor is treason."

Offline wrag

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3499
Religious question for Christians
« Reply #66 on: May 07, 2005, 10:02:06 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Vulcan
Were there not innocents in Sodom and Gomora, and during the great flood? It always seemed to me that someone with "god powers" took some pretty broadsweeps. In in those sweeps I'm sure there were "innocents", which means in essence god must have committed murder. Which throws the whole semantic definition of "thou shalt not kill" argument out the window.

And then theres sending people to be judged. I understood God judged you when you died and ended up outside the pearly gates. That your actions on earth decided your fate. And that bad people like Stalin, Pol Pot, and Hitler didn't get smited because thats not the way it works - ie they do their time on earth then get judged by god.

Yet in direct contradiction to this we have god smiting the entire planet, cities, and odd individuals from time to time.

I also don't get the whole flood the earth, nuke a couple of cities to start again then later when his people go off the rails a 3rd time he sends his son whom he sacrifices. Don't know about you but the god seems a little fast to pass the buck and let others take the fall for failures in his grand design.

Sometimes this christian god sounds just a little to "human" to me, to many flaws ;)


Nope!  According to the information there were NO innocents there.

It has already been pointed out, several times in fact, the original hebrew word used in that commandment means MURDER!   If you don't believe me ask a Rabi.

Some Scientist argue that GOD probably used sulfer, not a nuke.  They even think they may have found the cities.  The stone around em seems to be melted?

Errr ahh thinkin they haven't gone off the rail the third time yet.  Thinkin I recall reading that the people shall become as they were at the time of Noah 1st.

You know maybe you should read it instead of making such broad statements.

Naw never mind, thinkin this is more a case of seeing and hearing only what is wanted rather then actually looking at whats there, or then again maybe it's a troll.

Is that,





would that be,





a power trip kinda thing?



Hmmm....  Do i recall correctly ........ hmmm something in the bible about he or she who upsets others without just cause.... it's all put on them... double?

They get theirs just for being that way, you know the type, their the ones that think it's knee slapping funny to get others upset.  Plus they get what would normally be the other person or persons because they caused it without a just need or reason?  

Guess it don't matter to them if they don't believe.  Their thinkin it don't aply to them.  HMMM or does it?  Do they get it back even if they don't?  Seven fold?  Always hear that saying ... what goes around comes around.  Isn't that kinda a law of the universe?

Ya know what :D  It's all been explained more then once I believe.:aok  So it's on YOU SIR I'm done with it.
It's been said we have three brains, one cobbled on top of the next. The stem is first, the reptilian brain; then the mammalian cerebellum; finally the over developed cerebral cortex.  They don't work together in awfully good harmony - hence ax murders, mobs, and socialism.

Offline Vulcan

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9913
Religious question for Christians
« Reply #67 on: May 07, 2005, 06:07:28 PM »
seagoon I understand that sodom and gomora were clear of innocents. However, you cannot tell me that the great flood did not kill a single innocent. I also would like point out what kind of god turns a poor woman to a pile of salt because she "looked bad", its a bit over the top.

Offline Gunslinger

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10084
Religious question for Christians
« Reply #68 on: May 07, 2005, 06:48:22 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Vulcan
seagoon I understand that sodom and gomora were clear of innocents. However, you cannot tell me that the great flood did not kill a single innocent. I also would like point out what kind of god turns a poor woman to a pile of salt because she "looked bad", its a bit over the top.


She had no faith.  She was told have faith in me and don't look back.  How do you know she was just a poor woman....she could have been screwing around on LOT and looking back to see the destruction of the biblical "pool boy".....

Vulcan I have to ask are you just trolling here or are you genuinly interested in the answers.  You are comparing soddom and gamorrah with pol pot and hitler and the asking christians WHY?

CHRISTians....it has to do with Christ.  He died for our sins so that we who are not perfect can be forgiven.  The old testiment people did not have that luxury (SP).  Even noah himself testified to his neighbors that a great flood is coming and they laughed at him  (honor your neighbors as you honor yourself????)

In modern day if my neighbor was buidling a big bomb shelter and stocking up......I'd get a little worried.

Old testiment....noah.....

New Testiment.....Christ + new covenent (contract)

Is any of this making sense to you?

Offline Seeker

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2653
Religious question for Christians
« Reply #69 on: May 07, 2005, 09:22:35 PM »
Quote


Is any of this making sense to you?


About as much as the Tower of Babel.

Offline Seagoon

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2396
      • http://www.providencepca.com
Religious question for Christians
« Reply #70 on: May 07, 2005, 10:15:34 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Vulcan
seagoon I understand that sodom and gomora were clear of innocents. However, you cannot tell me that the great flood did not kill a single innocent. I also would like point out what kind of god turns a poor woman to a pile of salt because she "looked bad", its a bit over the top.


Howdy again Vulcan,

Obviously I wasn't clear enough on this point in the last post, my bad. So here it is very spelled out as simply as I can: Following the fall, there are no innocents not a one. The number of mortal men the bible speaks of as born innocent with no need of salvation from sin is a null set. Again and again, the bible speaks of the universality of sin:

Is. 53:6 "All we like sheep have gone astray; We have turned, every one, to his own way; And the LORD has laid on Him the iniquity of us all."

Romans 5:12 "Therefore, just as through one man sin entered the world, and death through sin, and thus death spread to all men, because all sinned"

Romans 3:10 "10 As it is written: "There is none righteous, no, not one"
Romans 3:23 "for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God,"

Gen. 8:21 "And the LORD smelled a soothing aroma. Then the LORD said in His heart, "I will never again curse the ground for man's sake, although the imagination of man's heart is evil from his youth; nor will I again destroy every living thing as I have done."

Ephesians 2:1 And you He made alive, who were dead in trespasses and sins,

This includes even Abraham, Lot's Uncle, who was saved not by being good, or doing good works but by faith in God's promises, including the promised Redeemer:

Gen. 15:6 "And he believed in the LORD, and He accounted it to him for righteousness."

NKJ Romans 4:1-5 "What then shall we say that Abraham our father has found according to the flesh?
 2 For if Abraham was justified by works, he has something to boast about, but not before God.
 3 For what does the Scripture say? "Abraham believed God, and it was accounted to him for righteousness."
 4 Now to him who works, the wages are not counted as grace but as debt.
 5 But to him who does not work but believes on Him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is accounted for righteousness,"

John 8:56-58 "Your father Abraham rejoiced to see My day, and he saw it and was glad."
 57 Then the Jews said to Him, "You are not yet fifty years old, and have You seen Abraham?"
 58 Jesus said to them, "Most assuredly, I say to you, before Abraham was, I AM."

So, God's judgment in each of the cases you cite was not a crime perpetrated on an innocent, or an arbitrary act of malevolence, it was the just judgement of a holy God on people "already condemned" to quote Christ in John 3:18.

That universality of sin is why, Jesus can state unequivocally in John 3:3 "Most assuredly, I say to you, unless one is born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God." and then in John 14:6 "Jesus said to him, "I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through Me."

If I can let me humbly suggest that the problems you are having are less with Christians per se than with the Anthropology and Soteriology taught in  the bible. It sounds like you are stuck in the same mode I was for awhile: "No, this cannot be right, I cannot, and I will not believe it"  

Let me leave you with a quote on the subject of the universality of sin written over a century ago by J.C. Ryle, Bishop of Liverpool:

"I admit fully that man has many grand and noble faculties left about him, and that in arts and sciences and literature he shows immense capacity. But the fact still remains that in spiritual things he is utterly “dead” and has no natural knowledge, or love, or fear of God. His best things are so interwoven and intermingled with corruption, that the contrast only brings out into sharper relief the truth and extent of the Fall. That one and the same creature should be in some things so high and in others so low; so great and yet so little; so noble and yet so mean; so grand in his conception and execution of material things and yet so groveling and debased in his affections; that he should be able to plan and erect buildings like those at Carnac and Luxor in Egypt and the Parthenon at Athens, and yet worship vile gods and goddesses and birds and beasts and creeping things; that he should be able to produce tragedies like those of Aeschylus and Sophocles, and histories like that of Thucydides, and yet be a slave to abominable vices like those described in the first chapter of the Epistle to the Romans—all this is a sore puzzle to those who sneer at “God’s Word written” and scoff at us as bibliolaters. But it is a knot that we can untie with the Bible in our hands. We can acknowledge that man has all the marks of a majestic temple about him, a temple in which God once dwelt, but a temple which is now in utter ruins, a temple in which a shattered window here, and a doorway there, and a column there, still give some faint idea of the magnificence of the original design, but a temple which from end to end has lost its glory and fallen from its high estate. And we say that nothing solves the complicated problem of man’s condition but the doctrine of original or birth–sin and the crushing effects of the Fall."

BTW - I am happy to go on as long as you wish, a lot of people have been very patient with me throughout my life even though I didn't merit it, and God is  still exceedingly patient with this particular sinner.

- SEAGOON
SEAGOON aka Pastor Andy Webb
"We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion... Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other." - John Adams

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Religious question for Christians
« Reply #71 on: May 07, 2005, 10:47:09 PM »
Inflammatory/Off topic
« Last Edit: May 09, 2005, 02:27:24 PM by Skuzzy »
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline Gunslinger

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10084
Religious question for Christians
« Reply #72 on: May 07, 2005, 11:45:14 PM »
Off topic
« Last Edit: May 09, 2005, 02:27:36 PM by Skuzzy »

Offline Vulcan

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9913
Religious question for Christians
« Reply #73 on: May 08, 2005, 05:52:35 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Gunslinger
Vulcan I have to ask are you just trolling here or are you genuinly interested in the answers.  You are comparing soddom and gamorrah with pol pot and hitler and the asking christians WHY?


One mans god is another mans genocidal maniac. The original question was does your god have to abide by his on laws. It seems how does not, however there seems to be a far number of christians who seem uncomfortable enough with their gods action who have felt the need to explain or excuse them.

seagoon, I appreciate a lot of work went into typing your answers, however I feel your probably are the perfect example of what I find most disappointing about christians. And that is an aversion to your own thoughts and opinions. Quoting endless pages from a bible that is essentially a compilation of anecdotes and looking for the answers to life in these.

I am not stuck in any "mode" ;) my mind is fairly open, and if I were religious, buddhism would be my path.

Offline fd ski

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1530
      • http://www.northotwing.com/wing/
Religious question for Christians
« Reply #74 on: May 08, 2005, 08:23:12 AM »
Will there be internet in hell ? :p