Author Topic: Atheism and the USA, followup  (Read 10634 times)

Offline Toad

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18415
Atheism and the USA, followup
« Reply #315 on: May 23, 2006, 11:51:24 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Chairboy
 I state exactly why you're mistaken, I'm not asserting to _know_ anything.  Atheist agnostic, remember?  So, try again.


You're a confirmed combination "NO/JUST DON'T KNOW" guy?

:lol
If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!

Offline SaburoS

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2986
Atheism and the USA, followup
« Reply #316 on: May 23, 2006, 12:10:39 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Holden McGroin
You've based your belief system on something that is not proven?  


Proven to my satisfaction. I have stated that.
Arguments for the existence of God have failed under scrutiny and logic (again, as I see it), hence the "faith" label.
The lack of my being able to see oxygen with my own eyes doesn't mean it doesn't exist. It has been proven to my satisfaction.
Green men from Mars I state with equal confidence that they do not exist. It has not been proven that they do. Faith is believing that they do exist. If a Green Men From Mars believer wants me to accept it as fact, then they will have to prove it to me. If they say "Prove to me they don't exist!", I'll say, "No thanks, that is your faith, have at it. I'll accept my truths and facts, you accept yours."
I aknowledge that when dealing with a faith based system, it is rather foolish to argue on a fact based level (so call me the fool sometimes).

Now those arguments of faith fall apart under scrutiny.
Creationism (uh-oh, another 1000 post thread right there only to get locked in the end).
Evolution (see above).
Offspring mutation (I mean if we all come from the same relatives)?
Flooding all of Earth killing off all life outside of Noah's Ark by raining constantly for 40 days/nights. Really?
How old is the Earth?
Our solar system?
Our Universe?
Parting of the Red Sea?

That's a start.

I don't have an agenda to kill off any religion as it is faith based in the belief of something existing.

Interesting some of the "Agnostics" on this BBS. You claim that you don't see the proof either way of God's existance, so it is a possibility of the Atheist being right. There is only one truth. We all choose what we accept it as is.
Men fear thought as they fear nothing else on earth -- more than ruin -- more even than death.... Thought is subversive and revolutionary, destructive and terrible, thought is merciless to privilege, established institutions, and comfortable habit. ... Bertrand Russell

Offline Hangtime

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10148
Atheism and the USA, followup
« Reply #317 on: May 23, 2006, 12:16:13 PM »
Yer making a big leap assuming 'god' is a christian. ;)

I await proof of diety, divinity, and little green men from mars.
The price of Freedom is the willingness to do sudden battle, anywhere, any time and with utter recklessness...

...at home, or abroad.

Offline SaburoS

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2986
Atheism and the USA, followup
« Reply #318 on: May 23, 2006, 12:18:31 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Bronk

Personally I have no idea if there is or isn't a supreme being.

Bronk


So you admit that I, as an Atheist, might very well be correct that there is no God/Supreme Being?

For you to deny even the possibility of my belief being right, puts you out of the "I have no idea if there is or isn't a supreme being." camp.

edit..oops, changed a word...
« Last Edit: May 23, 2006, 12:21:19 PM by SaburoS »
Men fear thought as they fear nothing else on earth -- more than ruin -- more even than death.... Thought is subversive and revolutionary, destructive and terrible, thought is merciless to privilege, established institutions, and comfortable habit. ... Bertrand Russell

Offline SaburoS

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2986
Atheism and the USA, followup
« Reply #319 on: May 23, 2006, 12:20:34 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Hangtime
Yer making a big leap assuming 'god' is a christian. ;)

I await proof of diety, divinity, and little green men from mars.


Naw, I'm playing the odds ;)

BTW, the proof will never be put forward as they can't do so.
The moment it does, is the moment it no longer is faith, but now becomes fact.
Men fear thought as they fear nothing else on earth -- more than ruin -- more even than death.... Thought is subversive and revolutionary, destructive and terrible, thought is merciless to privilege, established institutions, and comfortable habit. ... Bertrand Russell

Offline SaburoS

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2986
Atheism and the USA, followup
« Reply #320 on: May 23, 2006, 12:23:31 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by moot
Holden, I'll be impressed if you manage to make that particular point understood..


I'd actually be impressed for a true Agnostic to admit that the Atheist might be right.
Men fear thought as they fear nothing else on earth -- more than ruin -- more even than death.... Thought is subversive and revolutionary, destructive and terrible, thought is merciless to privilege, established institutions, and comfortable habit. ... Bertrand Russell

Offline Bronk

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9044
Atheism and the USA, followup
« Reply #321 on: May 23, 2006, 12:28:03 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Bronk


Technically then both sides are hypocritical. Because neither can prove or disprove .

 


Ohh and I Bow to your Omniscient  SaburoS since it's proven in  YOUR book it must be correct.

Bronk

EDIT: When I say "I don't know" it means just that. There may or may not be a supreme being. That clear enough for you.
« Last Edit: May 23, 2006, 12:50:23 PM by Bronk »
See Rule #4

Offline Holden McGroin

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8591
Atheism and the USA, followup
« Reply #322 on: May 23, 2006, 12:31:15 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by SaburoS
I'd actually be impressed for a true Agnostic to admit that the Atheist might be right.


The Atheist may very well be right but alas, there is no proof.

I'm happy to have impressed you.
Holden McGroin LLC makes every effort to provide accurate and complete information. Since humor, irony, and keen insight may be foreign to some readers, no warranty, expressed or implied is offered. Re-writing this disclaimer cost me big bucks at the lawyer’s office!

Offline SaburoS

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2986
Atheism and the USA, followup
« Reply #323 on: May 23, 2006, 12:49:38 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Bronk
Ohh and I Bow to your Omniscient  SaburoS since it's proven in  YOUR book it must be correct.

Bronk


About time you got it right!  Hehe. :D

Uhm, actually...what book?
Men fear thought as they fear nothing else on earth -- more than ruin -- more even than death.... Thought is subversive and revolutionary, destructive and terrible, thought is merciless to privilege, established institutions, and comfortable habit. ... Bertrand Russell

Offline SaburoS

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2986
Atheism and the USA, followup
« Reply #324 on: May 23, 2006, 12:58:33 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Holden McGroin
The Atheist may very well be right but alas, there is no proof.

I'm happy to have impressed you.


Almost there. You show your true "belief" hand by stating of no proof possible.
Atheists live in a fact based mindset, not a faith based one.
For one to believe in God, they must take it on faith, not facts.
For the Atheist to not believe in one, it is the lack of facts/proof that drive his belief.
What many are confusing here is that faith = belief. It is a faulty argument.
Burdon of proof is for those that say something exists. That has yet to be done with the Deity thing.
Men fear thought as they fear nothing else on earth -- more than ruin -- more even than death.... Thought is subversive and revolutionary, destructive and terrible, thought is merciless to privilege, established institutions, and comfortable habit. ... Bertrand Russell

Offline Bronk

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9044
Atheism and the USA, followup
« Reply #325 on: May 23, 2006, 01:08:53 PM »
SaburoS I have no problem with admitting you might be correct.
How ever you have a problem with me saying you might be wrong.
Just like the religious  have a problem with me saying they might wrong.

Pot... this is kettle.

Bronk
See Rule #4

Offline Chairboy

  • Probation
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8221
      • hallert.net
Atheism and the USA, followup
« Reply #326 on: May 23, 2006, 01:19:36 PM »
Bronk: I say that the Easter Bunny is a real, bipedal creature that walks around on easter and lays cadbury eggs for kids to find.  

YOU prove that I'm wrong.

EDIT: Oh, sadness.  You changed your mind after writing that you disagreed with the assertion that the burden off proof is on the person making the assertion, then deleted your post.  Just to avoid any confusion, here's what you wrote:

Quote
Quote
Saburo wrote:
    Burdon of proof is for those that say something exists.


Really where is this law written I'd like to read it.

Bronk[/b]
« Last Edit: May 23, 2006, 01:39:32 PM by Chairboy »
"When fascism comes to America it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross." - Sinclair Lewis

Offline Bronk

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9044
Atheism and the USA, followup
« Reply #327 on: May 23, 2006, 01:23:56 PM »
Thats how the damn things keep showing up .
:O :noid

Bronk
See Rule #4

Offline Bronk

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9044
Atheism and the USA, followup
« Reply #328 on: May 23, 2006, 01:35:11 PM »
My problem with the scientific approach is this.
Take certain foods for example 1st there good for us. then they all of sudden there bad, but wait they're OK again.
We can't explain everything.

And yes I deleted my post I was getting to far to one side of the issue and it was dumb, and not though out. Ohh here is one for you chairboy. Prove to an abortion rights activist that life starts at conception.  Or the right to lifer that it doesn't .  Good friggin luck.  They both are to busy in each others business.

Bronk

EDIT: Being agnostic I can admit that to being wrong. Can you?
« Last Edit: May 23, 2006, 01:42:36 PM by Bronk »
See Rule #4

Offline SaburoS

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2986
Atheism and the USA, followup
« Reply #329 on: May 23, 2006, 01:43:36 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Bronk
SaburoS I have no problem with admitting you might be correct.
How ever you have a problem with me saying you might be wrong.
Just like the religious  have a problem with me saying they might wrong.

Pot... this is kettle.

Bronk


I could be wrong but I don't recall reading:
1) You actually posting that the Atheist might be right.
2) That the believers of God might be wrong.

I have stated that those with faith believe in God as a truth to them. Their faith is so strong that it is good enough to pass as a fact, a truth.
I respect others enough that I will not try to convert them out of their beliefs.
I will defend mine, when questioned though (like anyone else here my guess).

You were saying something about Pot-Kettle?
Men fear thought as they fear nothing else on earth -- more than ruin -- more even than death.... Thought is subversive and revolutionary, destructive and terrible, thought is merciless to privilege, established institutions, and comfortable habit. ... Bertrand Russell