Author Topic: A Most Eloquent and Compelling Argument  (Read 2517 times)

Offline Toad

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18415
A Most Eloquent and Compelling Argument
« Reply #60 on: June 29, 2006, 08:10:21 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Neubob
the rest of the Arab world is starting to understand that the West is simply not ready or not able to deal with them on their own level.



I personally wouldn't underestimate the Euros.

I think the idea that they would roll over for Islamic terror or overt jihad overlooks the history of Europe.

When push comes to shove, these are the folks that fought two extremely bloody world wars tooth and nail. I think, if necessary, they are quite capable of dealing with anyone "on their own level".
If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!

Offline RedTop

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5921
A Most Eloquent and Compelling Argument
« Reply #61 on: June 29, 2006, 08:21:24 PM »
Well Bob....

To borrow a line from a movie...paraphrasing

We will die out there unless we heal in here. This country is in big trouble. And unless there is some serious healing......well....who knows
Original Member and Former C.O. 71 sqd. RAF Eagles

Offline RedTop

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5921
A Most Eloquent and Compelling Argument
« Reply #62 on: June 29, 2006, 08:25:39 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Toad
I personally wouldn't underestimate the Euros.

I think the idea that they would roll over for Islamic terror or overt jihad overlooks the history of Europe.

When push comes to shove, these are the folks that fought two extremely bloody world wars tooth and nail. I think, if necessary, they are quite capable of dealing with anyone "on their own level".


If I am understanding you by the phrase of "dealing with them on there own level" to mean that we get in the mud and fight there fight , then we won't ever win. We can't. That would mean taking the war to a level that the american people are not prepared as a whole to do.

On a personal note , I have no problem dealing with terrorists on thier level. None. Unfortunatley it will be called murder.
Original Member and Former C.O. 71 sqd. RAF Eagles

Offline Neubob

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2446
      • My Movie Clip Website
A Most Eloquent and Compelling Argument
« Reply #63 on: June 29, 2006, 08:26:49 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Toad
I personally wouldn't underestimate the Euros.

I think the idea that they would roll over for Islamic terror or overt jihad overlooks the history of Europe.

When push comes to shove, these are the folks that fought two extremely bloody world wars tooth and nail. I think, if necessary, they are quite capable of dealing with anyone "on their own level".


Well, yes, the Euros have fought tooth and nail in the past. They've done so against a very visible, very organized enemy. An enemy, however evil, that was easy to understand in how he operates because, for the most part, he was one of them. Hitler made a big deal out of creating a proud, powerful army, out of making famous a symbol, reproducing it, and doing everything he could to spread it to every corner of his domain. He was a European conquoror in the basic sense of the term. Practically speaking, he wasn't too far removed from Napoleon.

The current situation is different, I believe. It is, for the most part, an invasion of ideology and values. You don't see it coming like you do a Panzer division, and it certainly waves no flags in your face. It just shows up one day, and it's there, spreading like a virus. The Euros can't see the forest from the trees, and although they are quite capable of fighting like-minded foes, they seem to be deaf dumb and blind when it comes to this situation. Just reread some of the posts made here, and you'll see what I mean. They're still trying to apply their sense of right and wrong, humanity and inhumanity, to the Arab world. Playing by rules that don't exist.

Just ask our Israeli friend Caligula what it takes to make an arab listen. It takes a whack to the head, nothing more, nothing less. You do not ask or even demand respect, you impose it, and you do it over and over again, as many times as it takes.

Ironically, the Russians may yet turn out to be our best ally in this, because, unlike Western Europe they care little for PR, and are culturally and historically very at peace with brutality. No trials for any of the terrorists that took the Moscow theater a few years back... Summary executions before the terrorists even awoke, followed by buriels in pig-skin, just to spit in the face of their faith. The lives of their own citizens took a back seat to cold, harsh revenge. Now, as much as this may offend you, and me, you can bet that if push does come to shove, they will press the button, and ask questions later.

Of course, there will always be the predominant approach to this, and that will be to talk it out. Talking it out, in this case, is the same as trying to reason with a pissed-off Pit Bull. You don't reason, you beat him into submission, and then, only then, if he's not dead, you offer him a treat so he stops fearing you.

I think the major failing is that the Arabs know that we won't break our own rules and resort to their style of combat. And if one of us does, most likely the US and/or Israel, they know full well that the rest of the Western world will condemn the action. From the government, to the private citizen eating dinner at home, any Western power that takes initiates aggressive action will be seen as an oppressor. We have no cultural solidarity. They do, simply by virtue of the fact that any action against a Western power, 9/11 included, even if it is publically condemned by their government officials, is still regarded as righteous behind closed doors with total or near total universality.
« Last Edit: June 29, 2006, 08:40:26 PM by Neubob »

Offline RedTop

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5921
A Most Eloquent and Compelling Argument
« Reply #64 on: June 29, 2006, 08:59:19 PM »
good points Bob.

Still though , my belief is fight the fight you have to , to win.  But thats just me.

U.S. is fractured possibly beyond repair. It's sad when people will sell themselves and thier values out to jump on a bandwagon of popularity.

Common sense and truth have taken a back seat to Koolaid and bald face lies.

Live and let live is now my will over yours.

Even with all the problems this is the best place to live.
Original Member and Former C.O. 71 sqd. RAF Eagles

Offline Hangtime

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10148
A Most Eloquent and Compelling Argument
« Reply #65 on: June 29, 2006, 09:00:06 PM »
Once upon a time in History there was an English seaman that accomplished by direct action and utter lack of tact the goal of England.. unquestioned dominance of the Seas. His officers once queried him on possible scenarios when they found the enemy fleet. "If they are anchored?"

"attack".

"if it is dark?"

'attack".

"and if they have the advantage of numbers and the weather guage?

'attack'.

He was hated, feared and greatly respected by his adversaries.

The last here is not meant as disrespect to the French. It's just a slice of history, from a time when France was a hated enemy of the English:

"There is no way of dealing with the Frenchman but to knock him down - to be civil to them is to be laughed at. Why? They are enemies!"

Nelson -- 11 Jan 1798 after surrender of Capua.


The guy had the whole 'war' thing down. We can certainly not tread far wrong in following his example.

;)
The price of Freedom is the willingness to do sudden battle, anywhere, any time and with utter recklessness...

...at home, or abroad.

Offline RedTop

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5921
A Most Eloquent and Compelling Argument
« Reply #66 on: June 29, 2006, 09:07:18 PM »
But Hang,


The Public would have that guy thrown UNDER the prison now.

I see nothing from the Right wing , Left wing , Liberal , neo-con , Republican or Democrat that tells me that we are truley truely in this fight to win. WIN. Not settle. WIN.

Do you?
Original Member and Former C.O. 71 sqd. RAF Eagles

Offline Neubob

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2446
      • My Movie Clip Website
A Most Eloquent and Compelling Argument
« Reply #67 on: June 29, 2006, 09:10:29 PM »
Couldn't agree more, Hangtime.

And no, Redtop, I don't think anybody is in it to win anymore. Nobody on this side, anyway. It's all half measures and a whole lot of tongue-wagging.
« Last Edit: June 29, 2006, 09:13:55 PM by Neubob »

Offline Toad

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18415
A Most Eloquent and Compelling Argument
« Reply #68 on: June 29, 2006, 09:16:26 PM »
If somebody wins fair and square by using the ballot box, what do you call that? THERE is the "Muslim threat".

They won't win by sword; if you think so, you underestimate the Euros and the American citizen. Not saying there wouldn't be losses but I have no doubt as to the outcome wrt overt action.
If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!

Offline Hangtime

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10148
A Most Eloquent and Compelling Argument
« Reply #69 on: June 29, 2006, 09:21:19 PM »
yup. touchy feely 'proper' war. where the other side gets a fress pass, we gotta play 'nice'. a world of 'low order conflicts' where it's ok to sacrafice our young men and women for petro credits.

we, once upon a time, knew how to play this game. We had halseys and pattons.. "the only good jap is a gawdamned dead jap", and 'the point is to make the other dumb son-of-a-***** die for HIS country".

Now we got Kerry and Bush.

The diffrence between **** and shinola has been obfuscated.
The price of Freedom is the willingness to do sudden battle, anywhere, any time and with utter recklessness...

...at home, or abroad.

Offline Rolex

  • AH Training Corps
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3285
A Most Eloquent and Compelling Argument
« Reply #70 on: June 29, 2006, 09:23:04 PM »
The middle east is no different than the Main Arena. There 3 major groupings, sub groups (squads) beneath that, and diverse people with different priorities. No chess piece ever works together with uniform ideas of what to do next.

The result is people all looking out for themselves, trying their best to get kills for themselves, trying their best to not get killed, complaining when others don't play by their rules or etiquette, insulting each other and baiting each other with words, big-talking bullies within the safety and strength of a horde attacking the weakest of the three...

Somebody wins, but it starts all over again soon.

And so it is in the middle east.

Good luck with changing that. ;)

Offline Hangtime

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10148
A Most Eloquent and Compelling Argument
« Reply #71 on: June 29, 2006, 09:23:39 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Toad
If somebody wins fair and square by using the ballot box, what do you call that? THERE is the "Muslim threat".

They won't win by sword; if you think so, you underestimate the Euros and the American citizen. Not saying there wouldn't be losses but I have no doubt as to the outcome wrt overt action.


Actually, they won't 'win' with a ballot box unless the folks that wrote the software program want 'em to 'win'.

Oh, wait.. isn't argentina supplying our voting machines and software?
The price of Freedom is the willingness to do sudden battle, anywhere, any time and with utter recklessness...

...at home, or abroad.

Offline Maverick

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13958
A Most Eloquent and Compelling Argument
« Reply #72 on: June 29, 2006, 09:24:53 PM »
Ok Hang,

For the sake of argument we decide to take out syria and iran. Exactly what do you expect the rest of the world to do? I am assuming you plan to do this as a totally unilateral operation without any other countries assisting as I certainly don't see anyone in europe or even Great Britain helping out.

The idea of an isolationist nation in an industrialized time is fantasy. It isn't and cannot happen due to scarcety of resources. It happens we simply cannot maintain the economy at the current level if we close all our ports, international airports and rail lines. Our economy is tied for better or worse to much of the industrialized world. What are you going to do if the nations of europe decide to cut trade and monetary functions as we grandly sack those 2 countries?

I use the term sack for a very specific reason. There is no reason to destroy their complete infrastructure unless we were going to take over their assets. Once we have done the deed and destroyed their ability to fend for themselves and eliminated their nation, then what?

Secondly what are you going to do with the populations of those nations once you have destroyed the infrastructure? Who will police it, feed it and keep it in line?

Who do you think will continue to trade with this nation? What about the debts we owe other nations. Are you planning to tell them to forgive our debts as we forgave allied nations debts after WW2? Why should they?

Looking at the other option you raised. Simply pull back and leave them alone. What are you going to do to keep all those who were fighting us over there from now being free to plan how they are going to fight us over here? What is going to stop them from just loading up tons of explosives in shipping containers and sending them to multiple ports for a simultaneous attack in several cities?

Is it not clear that you simply can't operate in the world as if it were a vacuum?
DEFINITION OF A VETERAN
A Veteran - whether active duty, retired, national guard or reserve - is someone who, at one point in their life, wrote a check made payable to "The United States of America", for an amount of "up to and including my life."
Author Unknown

Offline Hangtime

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10148
A Most Eloquent and Compelling Argument
« Reply #73 on: June 29, 2006, 09:25:14 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Rolex
The middle east is no different than the Main Arena. There 3 major groupings, sub groups (squads) beneath that, and diverse people with different priorities. No chess piece ever works together with uniform ideas of what to do next.

The result is people all looking out for themselves, trying their best to get kills for themselves, trying their best to not get killed, complaining when others don't play by their rules or etiquette, insulting each other and baiting each other with words, big-talking bullies within the safety and strength of a horde attacking the weakest of the three...

Somebody wins, but it starts all over again soon.

And so it is in the middle east.

Good luck with changing that. ;)


No sweat for you Rolex... the Arabs will need Subaru's too.
The price of Freedom is the willingness to do sudden battle, anywhere, any time and with utter recklessness...

...at home, or abroad.

Offline Toad

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18415
A Most Eloquent and Compelling Argument
« Reply #74 on: June 29, 2006, 09:27:05 PM »
They may very well win with the ballot box, both in Europe and later in America.

I'm not talking short term, I'm talking long term. They outproduce any other ethnic group in Europe now, IIRC. Birthin' little voters at a prodigious rate. If they "win" that way, not much you can say about it.

As far as "rigged" elections, I just don't buy it. Maybe if the Dems and Repubs were secretly in cahoots sharing power but not with one party clearly hating the other and jumping on any chance to cry "foul". Right now, I can't see it.
If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!