Evidently the special prosecutor and the special grand jury figure she wasn't covert, either that, or they figured no one revealed her identity. I didn't decide that, they did. Why ask me about it? I didn't have a damned thing to do with it. I'm just reading the facts about what they decided. Evidently they felt there was nothing sufficient to merit a charge or indictment. They did feel the need to bring one charge of obstruction of justice to justify they're existence.
I never said I worked for the CIA. I doubt if I know anyone who did or does, I might.
Evidently, even the CIA can't make up their mind if she was covert in 2003. The CIA reports state she was recalled because she was compromised. Other CIA reports say she was at a desk performing administrative tasks, evidently not on any covert assignment. Half of D.C. knew she was a CIA employee.
The fact remains she was recalled at least 8 years before the column was published, and the CIA says she was recalled because she was compromised. And the truth is, some one in the CIA with an ax to grind with any number of people in the current administration could have set the complaint ball rolling.
The whole thing stinks of manufactured scandal. For all the reasons above, and in any number of previous posts.
Once again, same stupid question, and the same answer.
