Author Topic: Scores  (Read 2493 times)

Offline Reynolds

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2031
      • http://flyingknights.csmsites.com
Scores
« on: November 04, 2006, 01:40:16 PM »
Alright, I have read through my rankings this morning from last month, and my bomber rank is APALLING! 1000!!! I do a lot of bombing, I pretty much never miss with my bombs when hitting Strat. Targets (Which is just about all I do nowadays) And, I have quite a few more bails and ditches than I would like to have, but I would think I would be at least under 500. Here are my basic stats:

 Damage / Deaths + 1
 16614.67313 (1013)

Damage / Sorties
 8941.48439 (1114)

Hit percentage
 227.651 % (432)

Points
 2342668.91074 (228)

Field Captures
 0 (4374)

Kills:  8
Assists:  9
Sorties:  262
Landed:  99
Bailed:  50
Ditched:  14
Captured:  11
Death:  70
Disco:  18
Time hh:mm:ss  35:37:07
Ranks: 1000

That is my data for the last tour. In tour 80 my overall Bomber rank was 740, and in 79 it was 1212. Other than reducing the number of bails and ditches and making sure to land every one (Which I try any way, I just sometimes need to end a sortie fast for real-life reasons) how can I bring up my bomber rank? I know I sound petty for thinking so much about my rank, but bombing is the one thing in this game I am good at, the one thing I really dedicate myself to, and yet the numbers say I am pathetic. My squad was 50 over all bombing in that tour, and that needs to come up as well, but I assume whatever helps bring up my score can be applied to the others? I am CO of a Bomber squad, thats why I take this all so seriously. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Offline Stang

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6127
Scores
« Reply #1 on: November 04, 2006, 01:46:43 PM »
Furball in a TMB, Reynolds in a 109... Furball teh w1n!

Offline BlkKnit

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2090
Scores
« Reply #2 on: November 04, 2006, 01:47:56 PM »
That looks about right to me.  Need some base captures to get rank down.  Which, of course, has little to do with what you have been doing.  Anyway, I bet even 1 base capture woulda dropped you into the 800's or lower.

Rank is subjective.....hit % is about all I look at anymore.

Once a Knight is Never Enough

Offline BlkKnit

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2090
Scores
« Reply #3 on: November 04, 2006, 01:50:05 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Stang
Furball in a TMB, Reynolds in a 109... Furball teh w1n!


Be serious!  Poor kid has rank issues. :p

Anyway, TBM"s oughtta be perked :aok

Once a Knight is Never Enough

Offline Reynolds

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2031
      • http://flyingknights.csmsites.com
Scores
« Reply #4 on: November 04, 2006, 01:52:24 PM »
lol. Just noticed something. the top 3 bomber pilots of tour 81 have flown, compared to my 262 missions, 1) 96 missions, 2) 35 missions, and 3) 74 missions. lol. It seems the more I fly, the worse I rank. In the entire top 5 only one pilot flew more than 100 missions, and in the top ten there are only two. Should the data be beleived that I should just fly one run-per-tour and just make it one really good one? lol. I hope that isnt the only way. In the top 20, there was only one pilot with more missions than me, Tan, with 304.

Offline Reynolds

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2031
      • http://flyingknights.csmsites.com
Scores
« Reply #5 on: November 04, 2006, 01:53:29 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Stang
Furball in a TMB, Reynolds in a 109... Furball teh w1n!


I fail to see the relevance of this. So please re-insert it oraly and blow it out yer arse.

Offline Reynolds

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2031
      • http://flyingknights.csmsites.com
Scores
« Reply #6 on: November 04, 2006, 01:54:49 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by BlkKnit
That looks about right to me.  Need some base captures to get rank down.  Which, of course, has little to do with what you have been doing.  Anyway, I bet even 1 base capture woulda dropped you into the 800's or lower.

Rank is subjective.....hit % is about all I look at anymore.


Now, as for base capture it means being the one with the goon. Alright, Ill try to get a few of those in, though whenever I am on we rarely capture even a few bases.

So base captures are one. Is there any specific kind of target I should work on other than that?

Offline jhookt

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 488
Scores
« Reply #7 on: November 04, 2006, 02:01:26 PM »
hit percentage is not an accurate means to rank someone. for instance you look and the score minded fellows in this game(read  SHawk) and they have these incredibly high hit % i think this is do to stuka raids on strat targets. this is because (IMO) that strat targets have bigger clusters of buildings. 1 bomb for 10 buildings and your hit percentage gets astronomical. that might help your score some. but it'll prolly bore you to death also.

Offline Reynolds

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2031
      • http://flyingknights.csmsites.com
Scores
« Reply #8 on: November 04, 2006, 02:03:31 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by jhookt
hit percentage is not an accurate means to rank someone. for instance you look and the score minded fellows in this game(read  SHawk) and they have these incredibly high hit % i think this is do to stuka raids on strat targets. this is because (IMO) that strat targets have bigger clusters of buildings. 1 bomb for 10 buildings and your hit percentage gets astronomical. that might help your score some. but it'll prolly bore you to death also.


6 x 1,000lb on an Anti Air Factory have a similar effect? I use 12 x 500lb now, should I switch to the 6 x 1000?

Offline jhookt

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 488
Scores
« Reply #9 on: November 04, 2006, 02:13:35 PM »
no  use lancs and just the 1 4000lbs bomb. not that i am a rank chaser but if i were gonna game the game that's how i would go about it. but i'm unsure whether  obj eny has any effect. i dont think that it would but... the concept for hit% would be the fewer the bombs the more damage. using 6  1000lbs is going to reduce hit % cause your will prolly be dropping them close and then 1 bomb will not hit as many buildings as possible.

Offline Reynolds

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2031
      • http://flyingknights.csmsites.com
Scores
« Reply #10 on: November 04, 2006, 02:15:22 PM »
Never going to fly a lancaster. I only fly 24s and 17s, especially because I am the CO of an all B-17 squad.

Offline jhookt

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 488
Scores
« Reply #11 on: November 04, 2006, 02:16:48 PM »
thne use b-24's and the 2000lbs package

Offline Major Biggles

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2987
      • 71 Squadron Website
Scores
« Reply #12 on: November 04, 2006, 02:18:41 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Reynolds
Never going to fly a lancaster. I only fly 24s and 17s, especially because I am the CO of an all B-17 squad.



nothing wrong with lancs... :)

what happened to your 109 obsession? did you give that up after furball humiliated you? :) (you shouldn't get disheartened, he's a great stick).

the learning curve is steep but if you want to do it you can get over it pretty quickly. next time you see me, we can go to the TA if you like;)

71 'Eagle' Squadron RAF

Member DFC

Offline Husky01

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4844
Scores
« Reply #13 on: November 04, 2006, 07:11:52 PM »
My buff rank is 10:)
Fighter 15 :)
Attack 12:)
gv 13 :)
Overall 2

But rank dont meen snot Reynolds only thing that matters is that the guys around u can relay on u and know in there mind if they ask reynolds to close the vh down at a feild that he can do it!:aok
BearKats
9GIAP VVS RKKA

Offline Panzzer

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2890
Scores
« Reply #14 on: November 04, 2006, 07:20:30 PM »
What, we get scored now on how well we do? Is this something new? How many sorties do I need to be number one in the bombers? What's a bomber, does a Stuka count? Do I have any other questions that need answers? :)
Panzzer - Lentorykmentti 3