Originally posted by Yeager
Come up with a realistic solution.
====
350,000 more troops. Deploy an additional 150,000 along the borders of Syria and Iran.
Yeag,
I'm quoting the exact post I had responded to. Please note the very first line in your post, "come up with a realistic solution". Now I have to say that if the "solution is not possible, it's not realistic. Unless you are trying to do the same trick hitler tried to do, ordering units that did not exist into action, I fail to see how your "solution" is realistic. (And I am not saying you are hitler either.)
Secondly please quote my post here in the thread where I said I was supporting Bush.
My whole intent here is simple. I am tired of hearing nothing but complaining and accusations about how it was screwed up by those who have no clue how to "do it better". I want to see some specifics about how, using our current REAL resources not fantasy ones, it should be done. I want to see some kind of reality posed here with a differing strategy to handle the existing situation, not just some bald faced complaint about how it is being done. If you got a better idea, lets see it. If you are going to play armchair General you should have some kind of real world strategy. Here's your chance to show how brilliant you (and the others who sing the same song, it's not just you Yeag) are militarily.
Otherwise your total contribution to the thread is "I don't like bush" and "I don't want us in iraq". There's nothing wrong with that opinion. It just doesn't qualify anyone for being a real world tactician / strategist instead of just a complainer about how things are going. If you have something of substance lets see it.
That all I'm trying to accomplish. I simply do not see the demos, repubs, independents saying anything that is a true alternative except pull out the troops and come home. I just want to see the other alternative strategies to solve the current problem. Going back in time is not possible. We can't fight tomorrows conflict today. What is the solution to today?