Author Topic: Time to help the Me-410  (Read 11384 times)

Offline Viking

  • Personal Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2867
Time to help the Me-410
« Reply #60 on: March 30, 2007, 06:54:45 PM »
It could carry a lot more than 2,200 lbs of ordnance. The 2,200 lbs is for the bomb bay only. It could carry twice that number in bombs when using external shackles, and in addition two 300 litre drop tanks under the outer wing panels (just like on the 110G).So in just bombs and external fuel we’re looking at close to or more than 6000 lbs. Which would give a loaded weight with no ordnance or external fuel not much more than a normally loaded P-38L.

Edit: spelling
« Last Edit: March 30, 2007, 07:03:21 PM by Viking »

Offline Viking

  • Personal Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2867
Time to help the Me-410
« Reply #61 on: March 30, 2007, 07:06:48 PM »
Unless of course you believe the P-38 flew around weighing 20,000 pounds clean after we subtract its 2000 lbs bomb load from its max. take-off weight?

Your logic is so simple it boggles the mind.

Offline humble

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6434
Time to help the Me-410
« Reply #62 on: March 30, 2007, 07:16:43 PM »
I only find one source that shows the 2nd 2200lbs. I have no reason to argue the possibilities. It certainly has the power to haul ords. It was however a total failure in its role as a hvy fighter. It's certainly possible that the base configuaration with DT's and light internal fuel will perform better then I think. however without combat flaps its not going to come close to the 38 IMO. If we use a combat weight of 17,000's its still got wingloading of 43 lbs+....so I'd put it in the A20 range handling wise at best. Certainly not bad....but clearly inferior to the 110 and cannon fodder in the MA in all but a few hands.

Given the 30mm/20mm "light" loadout in the 110(G2) with 25% and DT's I dont see any value in the 410 in a fighter role. If it does in fact haul 4500 lbs of ords and DT's then it certainly has potential as a JABO bird that can furball afterward (much like the A-20){obviously the 2x20mm far superior}....but how many guys fly the 110 or A-20 worth a darn?


I think its to big and to slow to survive well in the MA....just 1 guys opinion. Just like the A-20....other than cobia and a few others its just cannon fodder....the 110 however can be a tough nut to crack....especially if it has alt & E to play with...

"The beauty of the second amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it."-Pres. Thomas Jefferson

Offline humble

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6434
Time to help the Me-410
« Reply #63 on: March 30, 2007, 07:19:48 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Viking
Unless of course you believe the P-38 flew around weighing 20,000 pounds clean after we subtract its 2000 lbs bomb load from its max. take-off weight?

Your logic is so simple it boggles the mind.


My logic is fine. Your sitting here comparing one of the most versital fighters of WW2 to a "fighter" that was withdrawn from service in less then a year. It's bigger, slower, less manueverable and had no combat success to speak of....who's delusional? The plane was a total waste of resources....

"The beauty of the second amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it."-Pres. Thomas Jefferson

Offline Viking

  • Personal Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2867
Time to help the Me-410
« Reply #64 on: March 30, 2007, 08:11:21 PM »
First of all I did not say you were delusional, but now that you mention it ... you are.

Second, the Me 410 started production in January 1943 and saw a lot more than one year of service. It saw ~18 months of service in the heavy fighter role and served until the end of the war in other roles.

Third, the Me 410 was very successful against allied bombers and the ZG units amassed impressive kill tallies until they faced single engine allied escorts in superior numbers. The Me 410 was not withdrawn from service in the west until mid-1944 … when most of the Luftwaffe was destroyed in the west by allied numerical superiority.

Fourth, the P-38 is faster than the Me 410 at 25k because of the turbochargers. At lower altitudes I expect the Me 410 to be the faster plane. And of course in contrast to the real world it is low altitude performance that matters in this game.

Fifth, yes I am comparing the Me 410 to the P-38, and in fact the Me 410 enjoyed greater success in the European Theatre than the P-38 … which was plagued with difficulties and was almost completely withdrawn from the ETO in favor of single engine fighters by the time the Me 410 was withdrawn.

Offline humble

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6434
Time to help the Me-410
« Reply #65 on: March 30, 2007, 08:38:23 PM »
Hmmm production started in May of 1943....II/ZG 26 was mauled on May 13, 1944 {which is what led to the removal from frontline service}....so last time I saw...may to may....was a year.

I have no doubt the 410 is well suited to bomber interception. The 410 got mauled as soon as it ran into fighters. In the action above the 410's faced 20 P-51's....hardly "overwhelming numbers".

I doubt the 410 is faster then the P38L at any altitude...

The 410 got mauled and was withdrawn from its primary role. The 38 served with distinction in the ETO/MTO until the end of the war. Numerous expertain fell to the P-38 in combat actions over western europe in 1944.

"The beauty of the second amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it."-Pres. Thomas Jefferson

Offline Viking

  • Personal Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2867
Time to help the Me-410
« Reply #66 on: March 30, 2007, 09:08:08 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by humble
Hmmm production started in May of 1943....II/ZG 26 was mauled on May 13, 1944 {which is what led to the removal from frontline service}....so last time I saw...may to may....was a year.


You are correct, deliveries began in May 1943, my mistake. It was not withdrawn from frontline service however, only as a bomber destroyer. It continued to serve as a reconnaissance plane and fast bomber.


Quote
Originally posted by humble
I have no doubt the 410 is well suited to bomber interception. The 410 got mauled as soon as it ran into fighters. In the action above the 410's faced 20 P-51's....hardly "overwhelming numbers".


When 12 Me 410 get jumped by 20 mustangs I call that overwhelming numbers.


Quote
Originally posted by humble
The 410 got mauled and was withdrawn from its primary role.


The Me 410’s primary role was as a fast bomber and ground attack plane. Bomber destroying was just one of its many talents.


Quote
Originally posted by humble
The 38 served with distinction in the ETO/MTO until the end of the war.


With indignation you mean. It was hardly a popular plane with its crews or the leadership in the ETO. So unpopular was the P-38 that the Air Force stateside sent famous air racer Tony LeVier over to Britain to teach the pilots how to survive in a P-38. His “air shows” were indeed popular, but futile.

Early 1944, Tony LeVier was ordered to get to the ETO fast. The P-38 was awash in rumors or how deadly it can be to fly. Pilots not experienced with twin-engine flying were having many preventable accidents. Many of these pilots were killed not by the enemy, but a lack of knowledge on how to operate in case of an emergency. With the many engine problems, operating with one engine was a necessity. At some point in the war in the ETO, every pilot would probably be faced with a one-engine flying situation. LeVier was to get to Britain and demonstrate flying techniques to the pilots and would in the process hopefully dispel many rumors, which were unfounded.

LeVier believed too little testing at high altitudes was done before sending the P-38s to Britain. He also believed that too many experienced pilots were spread too thin in the pilot ranks, and that the cockpit heat was a serious problem. It was not just the comfort of the pilot, but when the pilots were cramped in a small cockpit under extreme cold situations, they were not in a good flying condition when encountering enemy aircraft. Also, the windows would fog up, and reduce visibility. He arrived at the 364th Fighter Group at Honington. LeVier was not spreading propaganda, and was honest with the pilots he met with. They were informed about all the known limitations of the aircraft, but he also spoke with them on all the positive aspects of the aircraft as well. Manu demonstrations were preformed, such as recovering from a dive.

LeVier continued his demonstration tour and arrived at Kingscliff, home of the 20th Fighter Group. The pilots of the 20th were not overly impressed with his lecture. LeVier proceeded to take up his P-38 (equipped with the new dive flaps). At 25,000 ft., LeVier dove straight down, and the pilots rushed out to see what they thought would be a crash. He easily pulled out without any problems, and for extra emphasis, he preformed several low level one-engine rolls. The current P-38s in the ETO were not equipped with this flap, but he was attempting to showcase the new features, which would be arriving soon. The pilots were shown that they would be able to pursue a German fighter diving out of trouble. The demonstration was indeed successful.

Goxhill was home to a commander who could easily be considered a P-40 man. He disliked the P-38, and the pilots under his command reflected that opinion. LeVier went "all out" in his demonstrations. He convinced them that the problem was inadequate training, not an inadequate aircraft. LeVier won over the opinions of the commander and the pilots. The next stop was in Andover, the headquarters of the 9th Fighter Command. These pilots originally came from a P-47 outfit in the States, and were having difficulty transitioning to the twin-engine P-38. LeVier demonstrated several dives, low-level upside-down passes on one engine, accelerated stalls, and circled the base upside-down several times. Virtually everyone on the base came out to watch the "air show".

LeVier's demonstration tour was an overwhelming success. During the four months he was in Britain, an estimated 2,000 engines were replaced on the P-38s. This staggering number was the main reason for the transfer of the P-38s out of the ETO. Levier was using his special P-38, which was equipped with the newly designed dive flaps. The problem was after he demonstrated the P-38s ability to recover from dives, the pilots had to go back to flying the older P-38s in their units. Lockheed quickly loaded up 400 sets of dive flaps for installation in the ETO. A C-54 cargo aircraft was loaded up and sent to Britain. The results from the installation of the flaps would be tremendous and many pilots and aircraft would be saved. However, during the flight, a British pilot mistook the aircraft for a German aircraft, and shot it down. The loss of the flaps was the final blow to the P-38 in the ETO. General Doolittle had previously started the transition to only P-51s and P-47s. Lockheed would never get a chance to reproduce the dive flaps, and none were installed on P-38s in the ETO.



Quote
Originally posted by humble
Numerous expertain fell to the P-38 in combat actions over western europe in 1944.


Name one. (Edit: I know of one, but do you?)
« Last Edit: March 30, 2007, 09:16:29 PM by Viking »

Offline humble

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6434
Time to help the Me-410
« Reply #67 on: March 30, 2007, 09:41:36 PM »
You are a bit pompous arent you.....Walter Oesau May 5, 1944....

I can name others with the required 20+ kills....your up....

"The beauty of the second amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it."-Pres. Thomas Jefferson

Offline hubsonfire

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8658
Time to help the Me-410
« Reply #68 on: March 30, 2007, 09:42:24 PM »
If we get all of those cannon loadouts, including the BK5, you can count me in as well. :t
mook
++Blue Knights++

Proper punctuation and capitalization go a long way towards people paying attention to your posts.  -Stoney
I was wondering why I get ignored so often.  -Hitech

Offline Viking

  • Personal Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2867
Time to help the Me-410
« Reply #69 on: March 30, 2007, 09:48:13 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by humble
You are a bit pompous arent you.....Walter Oesau May 5, 1944....

I can name others with the required 20+ kills....your up....


Yup, Oesau was the one I know too. Took five P-38's 20 minutes to finally kill him. Can you name enough to support your "numerous expertain" claim? (Assuming you meant "Experten".)

Offline humble

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6434
Time to help the Me-410
« Reply #70 on: March 30, 2007, 09:49:55 PM »
12 got shot down....

The plane was designed as a fighter...not a bomber...it blew chunks in that capacity. Now if you compare it to the A-26 which was an attack bomber OK. The planes have similiar wingloading and should be somewwhat similiar....but the iron dog isnt gonna be anything but a faster more heavily armed A-20. It is not and was not a "fighter".

As for the 38, the P-47 and P-51 were both more suited to the needs of the ETO. The P-51 was the premeir longe range escort in the war and the p-47 has the distinction of being the only plane in which every "double ace" survived the war.

The 410 was the continuation of a bad idea. If you want to see a "hvy fighter" done right look no further then the F7F...

"The beauty of the second amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it."-Pres. Thomas Jefferson

Offline humble

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6434
Time to help the Me-410
« Reply #71 on: March 30, 2007, 09:52:17 PM »
Your up champ....you asked me if I knew 1....took me 30 seconds to answer you.

"The beauty of the second amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it."-Pres. Thomas Jefferson

Offline Viking

  • Personal Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2867
Time to help the Me-410
« Reply #72 on: March 30, 2007, 09:56:25 PM »
The Me 410 was primarily designed as a Schnellbomber (it had an internal bomb bay for cryingoutloud). The first unit to operate the Me 410 was KG 2 who used it to bomb England. The first casualty was also a Schnellbomber (over England). Only when the US daylight bombing raids became a big problem in late 1943 was the Me 410s converted (effortlessly due to the design) to the bomber destroyer role.

Offline Viking

  • Personal Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2867
Time to help the Me-410
« Reply #73 on: March 30, 2007, 09:58:34 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by humble
Your up champ....you asked me if I knew 1....took me 30 seconds to answer you.


It was the one I knew. One does not support your "numerous" claim. Now enlighten me as to the vast number of Experten that fell to the P-38, or fess up that you exaggerated.

Offline Viking

  • Personal Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2867
Time to help the Me-410
« Reply #74 on: March 30, 2007, 10:04:46 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by humble
Now if you compare it to the A-26 which was an attack bomber OK. The planes have similiar wingloading and should be somewwhat similiar....but the iron dog isnt gonna be anything but a faster more heavily armed A-20. It is not and was not a "fighter".


In the other thread you compared the A-20 to the Mosquito in terms of wing loading…

Quote
Originally posted by humble
the A-20 by comparision was just under 40 lbs/sqf {about same as Mosquito}. The 410 is a target drone. If they model it right it'll be a total flop in the MA......


And I answered:

Quote
Originally posted by Viking
So you’re now saying that a Me 410 has about the same wing loading of a Mosquito (as if you cant fly a Me 410 with less than 4-5,000 lbs of ammo and fuel). Ok I’ll accept that for now. The Mosquito is in fact a very maneuverable plane with a turning circle of just ~50 feet more than the Bf 110G at 679 feet. In comparison the P-38L has a turning circle of 817 feet, 596 feet with full flaps. If the Me 410 turns as well as the Mossie I’ll be very pleased.