And Jackal, at least this one is from you:
"
For some strange reason it usualy does to those who have already had their freedom of choice taken away by their government.
A variation of the Stockholm syndrome maybe?????"
Where does the freedom of choice cross with the freedom of choice?
I would love to have a handgun, but at the same time, I wouldn't trust half the household for it. So, there is a balance somewhere. No Stockholm syndrome (some refer to it as Helsinki syndrome and actually the meaning of it is sideways to this discussion, - hostage getting to like the one who is holding him, - you should have used master and dog perhaps, hehe) , but from my point of view, a question of common sense, based on knowing your turf.
Personally I rather choose to have less arms in the pool, while it means to me that my personal hobby of having some and shooting will suffer for it.
I love to have that choice, and I still have it while you don't
There is one heavy point here, while I am not claiming that gunlaw like ours would cure things in the USA, the feedback is that it's uncompareable and pointless anyway. Well, maybe you should not be the ones to give advise, and instead be glad that there are no Detroits all over Euroland?