Originally posted by Phaser11
Whenever you use a gun in self defense you will have to answer for it. It might be clear as to what happened and the local DA will not file charges. The again, if you stay and shoot the person, one of the question you will be asked and have to show (usually at the seine) how were YOU threatened/ Did YOU have a way out? Why did YOU take the law into your own hands?
It is legal in all 50 states to employ deadly force to stop someone in the act of committing a murder. Whether you are threatened or not is irrelevant. Whether or not you could escape is irrelevant.
Had anyone shot down that kid, they would not be facing criminal charges.
Lets apply some common sense thinking, ok?
The only question that seems worth thought is, how smart would it be to face off against an AK-47 with a sidearm? Not a good idea, generally.
You had better get around the shooter's flank and get close enough not to miss.
As to Mall security; it doesn't exist. These "guards", poorly paid and not representing the finest of society, specialize in rousting mall rats and flirting with female sales clerks at the Gap. In terms of value in a shooting situation, they are nearly useless. Not completely useless, as they can serve as an example of utter futility.
What people don't seem to grasp is that if you want security, you had better provide it for yourself. There's little chance that anyone will aid you in time to save your bacon. So, you better be prepared to deal with things on your own. When it comes to most crime, your local police officer is little more than a crime statistics data miner rather than a crime fighter. Most of the time they arrive just in time to take the report.
My regards,
Widewing