The military will never admit that they have plenty of resources. Soon as they do they start losing what they have. To say we couldn't very easily engage in a much larger war than what we face in Afghanistan and Iraq pretty quickly is only said by the military looking for more funds or someone looking to criticize the commander in chief.
After 6 years of 2 ongoing wars, costing at least 1 trillion of our dollars (and that is being conservative)... sometimes the
truth is the truth. With upwards of a third to 45% of the Army's combat ready regular active brigades already committed elsewhere (not just Iraq) I respectfully disagree with you. Now, unless you somehow think that throwing national guard troops mixed with army ACB's (Active Combat Brigades) at Regular Russian Actives on
their soil is a good idea.......(I'm probably talking to a wall here, you probably live in a world where you think US NG troops actually had a chance versus regulars) we just don't have the strength to do it. If the fight was in Alberta..... yeah, we could do it, with our backs ups against the wall. 12K miles away, with transport and logistical hurdles that are near impossible to surmount, and without prepositioned heavy equipment.... FORGET it.
I also note that your military background notwithstanding, you rush quickly to judge a man who is Chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. How many commands have you had, again?
Considering you're out.... I'd say you haven't had one...certainly not a list like this. I'll take this man's word over your BBS rationale....he's the one responsible.
Michael G. Mullen, Commands held
Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff
Chief of Naval Operations
U.S. Naval Forces Europe
Allied Joint Force Command Naples
Vice Chief of Naval Operations
U.S. Second Fleet
NATO Striking Fleet Atlantic
Cruiser-Destroyer Group Two
George Washington Battle Group
USS Yorktown (CG-48)
USS Goldsborough (DDG-20)
USS Noxubee (AOG-56)