What Angus put:
That's why the 109 had the slats, - as Gunther Rall once told me, he didn't prefer them in combat, because in a rough turn they would throw off his aim, but WITHOUT them the landing would have been unacceptably high.
What I put in reponse:
"From your logic, the spits bigger wings were ONLY for landing."
What Angus put in response:
How on earth did you come to that.
ARE YOU BIASED OR JUST STUPID? (SEE BELOW, PROOF)
MOre examples of your logic, could be shown in the game:
-Narrow undercarraige was only for crashing, not rolling.
-Wing slats were for landing and messing up aim.
-wing slats were not turning, not flaring.
And you pretend to be neutral
Thanks Furball for the info:
I didn't check the whole list, I hopped around and found...
Angus in tour 23 (dec 01-jan02)
Hurri IIC... 39 kills
Seafire..... 24 kills
Yak 9U..... 24 kills
Spit IX..... 18 kills
LVTA4...... 16 kills
B-26........ 15 kills
TBM-3...... 09 kills
F4U-1C..... 06 kill
C205........ 05 kills
A6M5b...... 04 kills
etc etc,
NO KILLS IN A 190
NO KILLS IN A 109
NO KILLS IN A 110
So Angus and LYNX both HATE THE LUFTWAFFE, PROVEN!
STOP PURPOSELY MESSING UP THIS THREAD!