For some reason my quote option is not working correctly, so again I'll do this the long way.They were but the horde NOE crowd whined and it went poof...along with big maps. We may see both happen again.Went away? I thought this is what this thread was complaining about. So evendentually they didn't go away.
Who am I telling not to noe? I just want some balance. Lower dar to 100-200 feet and kill auto pilot below 200'. Make em work just a little.I have no problem with the above suggestions. I think it would make the game a bit more fun than it already is, but it sort of sounds like your trying to dictate play. Naw, you wouldn't do that.
Not in the mission but limit numbers that can hide below bar dar. Say between 7-15.Now this is really ridiculous.
You do realize repeating yourself just doesn't make it true?Read your quote above, and you question me.
Sorry bout the extra fee but you do get to live in texas. Happy to live here. It makes it worth the extra buck.
You are the one claiming about not being too serious about the game. I see it struck another nerve, again sorry.Have no idea where you dreamed this one up. Serious, I don't even know where you interpreted this from. Struck a nerve? You give yourself way toooooo much credit. I assure you Bronk, you will have to go a long way to get my dandruff worked up. I just like answering some of the BS I seen posted with my own BS.
Then why did you say all I wanted was the 1vs1.. or you going to deny your own text?For the life of me, I could not at first figure out what you were talking about here. I went back and read my original post and I see where you can take one little sentence and alter the whole meaning of what was being said. Here let me correct my mistake, I already did this in the previous post, but I guess you didn't get that either.
In the bold where you see "
You want your classic one on one" replace it with, "When players want their classic one on one". Now that should clear it up. I said in my previous post that my opinion was not specifically directed at anyone.
Here it is again in case you missed it "
Only the top part of my response "not in bold" was directed to you. The rest is my "OPINION", and was not directed at anyone specifically. Guess you missed the "opinion" sentence. ". Hope it's clear now. Was a simple mistake, but by reading the entire section it is easily seen I was speaking in general terms.
Then why did you say all I wanted was the 1vs1.. or you going to deny your own text?Not denying that's what I typed, but when one reads the entire post, it is easily seen as a mistake by using first person, instead of using a general term. Of course you don't see that, but then again I expect that.
I highly doubt the game has change all that much... just look at the same bs on the bbs.
Actually it has, in my opinion, changed a bunch. Can't learn everything from reading a book, well, maybe you can.
You are the one claiming about not being too serious about the game. I see it struck another nerve, again sorry.I still have no idea what nerve you are speaking about. I really am starting to think that you actually believe that you are getting me all worked up about this. Let me send you a clue. I am retired, the kids are grown, and my wonderful wife doesn't nag me about playing the game. I have nothing but time on my hands to read the forums, and do other things I like to do.
About being serious about the game, that is open to one's interpretation. Do I let this game control my life, the answer is no. Am I serious when I play, I like to think I am, but I'm sure others have different opinions. Be sort of like defining a horde, there is no real answer, everyone has their on definition..
Now here is the big one.
As are you entitled to yours. Game history though is on my side. When we as a community fail to police ourselves HT steps in. Be it ENY, adding a plane to the perk list or removing maps... donut anyone.In this type of community, it will never be able to successfully police itself.
I will explain why. When a player can change his ID at will, then there is no accountability to the community. Sure HTC can track this and take action if needed, but the community itself can do nothing. It has no enforcement capabilities, and peer pressure is out of the question when an identity can be changed on a whim. In this type of community when one tries to dictate behavior, it turns into a spam session on the BBS, 200 and/or country channel. I just saw this happen the other night. Sides are taken, and then the button pushers join in, and it is nothing but a free for all.
HiTech is the ruler, and with the diverse amount of players that we have he, and his staff will be the one dictating the how, whys, whens, and wheres. I think he has made that perfectly clear. I actually like it that way. HiTech and staff may take suggestion from players, and I believe they actually do, but in the end the buck stops with them, not the community. So the thinking that the community can solely police itself is a pure fantasy.
No thanks on the donuts, you better lay of them though, I think you are getting way to much sugar.
Fred
