Baumer,
There are three rings on the sight: 25mil inner, 50mil middle, and 100mil outer. Per the description of the sight, with a 100mil calibration a target with a 30-foot wingspan should have its wingtips touching the middle (50mil) at a range of 200 yards. The Dora has a wingspan of 39ft, so at the time I did my calculations was the closest of the drones I could use for my test.
(Image removed from quote.)
Here is the Dora with the full Mk.8 sight at default head position. Note that at 200 yards the Dora's wingspan fills the OUTER ring. This is incorrect per the above description, as it should be using the middle ring instead.
(Image removed from quote.)
It is interesting to know that the USN/USMC used 25, 50, 100 mil rings ( or rads ) to where the USAAR used 35, 70, 105 mil on their 3 ring iron sights & optical sights........ one would assume that since all Air Corps of the US Military used the same .30 cal M1/M2, .50 cal M2 etc... that they would use the same type of sight measuring distances......even though those sights have changed from like the 6 version, 8 version, 9 version, 14 etc..... ( can go into specific sight model #/names if needed just have to dig thru some pages for correct nomenclature)
(rad is 1/2 the width of a ring ) ( rad{s} would help pilots & Gunners both, determine how much lead to allow, as well as help determine how far away the enemy plane actually was, from just about any angle...... and which way to allow for lead ( what direction )
Now if HTC ( Aces High ) scales ( has already scaled ) the optical & iron sights to historical measurements, then it would open a whole new way of learning / teaching / practicing how to figure out Fighter/Gunner gunnery..... and for those who take this all in and study it, I would imagine that their hit percentages would increase a good margin.....
I welcome any corrections on anything I may have mis posted above......
can wait to see all this on the AHwiki...... ( not this thread, but what Baumer puts on the AHwiki

)