Thankyou deezcamp.
Its because of statements like this that N1K2's are easier to kill than they have ever been in the past.
I love it when a pilot dives in an N1K2 expecting to be able to pull an 8g turn at 350 and is trying to figure out what went wrong when my slightly slower F6F turns inside of him and tears his wings off. I also love it when an N1K2 thinks he can hang indefinately on his tail and catch that plane 800 yards above him... just before he slides backwards and gets torn apart. I love it when an N1K2 pilot thinks his cannons can reach as far as a set of .50's and starts spraying from 700 yards back.
There is nothing about the N1K2 that makes it invincible. Is it a good plane? Yep. Is it the first plane that everyone takes a pot shot at in a furball? Yep. Is it a plane that usually has 2 planes on it? Yep. Is it a plane that kills everything around it without discretion? Nope.
About the only remotely accurate argument in this whole thread is that there are alot of them in the arena right now. When I see threads that discuss the uber characteristics of the plane I definately see a "cause and effect" rule in action.
And Lazs... there is only one fighter (202 excluded) that the F6F-5 has a better than 1:1 k/d ratio against

AKDejaVu
[ 07-31-2001: Message edited by: AKDejaVu ]