Originally posted by Zigrat:
please fishu, aces high isnt perfect and im not a cheerleade,r but i see you flying over at ww2ol and id have to say ah is leaps ahead of ww2ol in teh flight department
Krhm, I havent been playing WWII OL for at least two weeks (thats when I got OFP)
I did also got bored to AH long time before I had a chance to get my hands on WWII OL, so your point is unvalid here since WWII OL has not changed my opinions towards AH in any manner, nor have I used it to compare with AH.
(I haven't played AH for at least half an year, thats way before I got to try WWII OL)
If we go into comparison, then I'd have to say that WWII OL has some good things that AH does not have and doesn't seem to ever have.
Also Mo has stated that flight model isn't yet done in WWII OL, so I'll wait with final judgement.
Good thing is that there seems to be different stall behavior for the planes and 109 actually has the slats.
In AH, every plane tends to stall same, but at different speeds and different stick force... which has been bugging me since the begining.
like 109 stalls like other planes, just at different speed and with more nose heavyness than others. (and its highly hyped slats are hyped to make stalls different)
imho, I liked more of 1.03 FM than current, at least then E fightning was more crucial, although, overmodelled.
Now I feel it slightly bit too relaxed.
Again if we go in comparison with WWII OL, I like the way how fights are fought close in, rather than from at 800 yards AH/WB/DOA/AW style.
So im wishing for flight models to get better in WWII OL, it would be really that what I'd like - close in fights with 'pea shots'
although, lets note again that I got bored to AH already months ago, before WWII OL had any meaning to me and even after WWII OL, I still have same reasons for AHs boredom.