Author Topic: Me410  (Read 19349 times)

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23047
Re: Me410
« Reply #150 on: July 22, 2012, 01:14:37 PM »
That's an under statement..  110 eats F4Us and spits.
Only incompetently flown F4Us and Spitfires, which makes your claim useless.  Equal skill the F4U and Spitfire will utterly dominate the Bf110.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline DrBone1

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4896
Re: Me410
« Reply #151 on: July 22, 2012, 01:25:21 PM »
Any pilot of equal skill to Krup will die.

Now if you said a more experienced pilot than Krup I would agree.
=The Damned=
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n6jjnCoBobc
I see DrBone has found a new Sith apprentice. Good, good, let the hate flow through you.  :devil
Move up, move over, or move aside.  Simple kombat 101.

Offline Krupinski

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2083
      • Twitch
Re: Me410
« Reply #152 on: July 22, 2012, 01:28:05 PM »
Fester beats me 8 times out of 10 in the same plane, I reversed the odds when I was in a 110 and he was in an F4U/Spit.

Offline DrBone1

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4896
Re: Me410
« Reply #153 on: July 22, 2012, 01:38:03 PM »
Films or it didn't happen.  :D
=The Damned=
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n6jjnCoBobc
I see DrBone has found a new Sith apprentice. Good, good, let the hate flow through you.  :devil
Move up, move over, or move aside.  Simple kombat 101.

Offline Hajo

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6034
Re: Me410
« Reply #154 on: July 22, 2012, 01:52:02 PM »
The A20 havoc  (AAC)  was designed as a low level attack aircraft.  Bostons were A20s the Brits used at a little higher levels as bombers.

During the Invasion.....A20s were flying so low that their props cut swaths through the hedge rows.  That is fact.

Even used by the Brits early war the Bostons were a chore to catch by the Axis Fighters of that time period.

In Never Never land, our MA, where the greatest mostfastestbiggestgunnedrunaw ayafterapass aircraft of later war years handle an A20 or Boston a little easier.
- The Flying Circus -

Offline titanic3

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4235
Re: Me410
« Reply #155 on: July 22, 2012, 02:02:33 PM »
The only planes that I think will lose to an A20, assuming equal skilled pilots are:

Me-410
190F8
190A8 (maybe)
Ta-152 (on the deck, TnB)
P40s
P39s

In a DA environment, 1v1 merge, the other plane needs to be able to turn/roll better than the A20, to bleed its speed, and then have the acceleration required to start an uphill battle, exceptions being the extreme turny birds (A6M, Hurri, Brew) who can just flat turn and beat it. If the plane cannot force the A20 on the defensive by hard maneuvers, then it will not win. For example, the Ta152 out climbs theA20 in the charts, but in a 1v1 fight, the A20 can turn with it, forcing the 152 on the defensive. The 152 cannot use its climbing power because it's too busy trying to keep the A20 of its tail. The A20 has the inertia to go in a shallow dive then zoom up, giving it plenty of time to kill the other plane.

  the game is concentrated on combat, not on shaking the screen.

semp

Offline Full Metal Jug

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 72
Re: Me410
« Reply #156 on: July 22, 2012, 04:30:58 PM »
The 410 is just a good buff hunter.  I love how a new plane gets added and "it's not as great as I thought it would be" posts start.

Low to medium alts it like the 110.

High alt (25 - 30 k) and its a bit worthless. I had to let some Lanc's walk last night.

It's not as nimble as a 110 so don't turn fight.
Nein nein nein nein! Der Focke Wulf ist!

"When a stupid man is doing something he is ashamed of, he always declares that it is his duty."
 
— George Bernard Shaw (1856-1950)

Offline GScholz

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8910
Re: Me410
« Reply #157 on: July 22, 2012, 05:51:56 PM »
lol!

"With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censored, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."

Offline SmokinLoon

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6166
Re: Me410
« Reply #158 on: July 22, 2012, 06:20:42 PM »
I have numbers based on my own tests.  All twin engined fighters have the advantage over the A-20G, unless they turn with it.  They are all faster and climb better (though the climb advantage of the Me410 is marginal against an unladen A-20G).

All the Mossi has to do is get the A20 in a shallow spiral climb.  The Mossi only needs to keep the speeds above 250TAS and vertical as much as possible.  Speed, climb, and acceleration all favor the Mossi in a big way.  Turn radius favors the A20 but not by much, not enough to really even make mention of it.  The 110 has the edge as well.  **I cant believe I'm defending the Mossi and 110 vs the A20**   
Proud grandson of the late Lt. Col. Darrell M. "Bud" Gray, USAF (ret.), B24D pilot, 5th BG/72nd BS. 28 combat missions within the "slot", PTO.

Offline IrishOne

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1529
Re: Me410
« Reply #159 on: July 22, 2012, 06:31:42 PM »
Only incompetently flown F4Us and Spitfires, which makes your claim useless.  Equal skill the F4U and Spitfire will utterly dominate the Bf110.

i was fighting Krups 110c in a Spit5 last night.   30 fights, at least.    i won maybe 5.   i believe im competant.   110 dominates if flown right, whether you believe it or not.
-AoM-

Offline Delirium

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7276
Re: Me410
« Reply #160 on: July 22, 2012, 06:34:38 PM »
How nice it is to have a civil discussion about these things. Not like back in the day... Me likes!  :cheers:

The only difference is from then and now is you aren't accusing HTC of some kind of anti-Luftwaffe bias.

Delirium
80th "Headhunters"
Retired AH Trainer (but still teach the P38 selectively)

I found an air leak in my inflatable sheep and plugged the hole! Honest!

Offline titanic3

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4235
Re: Me410
« Reply #161 on: July 22, 2012, 07:26:34 PM »
All the Mossi has to do is get the A20 in a shallow spiral climb.  The Mossi only needs to keep the speeds above 250TAS and vertical as much as possible.  Speed, climb, and acceleration all favor the Mossi in a big way.  Turn radius favors the A20 but not by much, not enough to really even make mention of it.  The 110 has the edge as well.  **I cant believe I'm defending the Mossi and 110 vs the A20**   

Assuming you can force the A20 to that position in order to be roped. It's not hard at all if you have even 1K of alt over the A20. It's when your slower/lower or in an equal E fight like in the DA. Cobia wins in the MA because newbies underestimate the A20 and start burning all their E to try to get on it's 6.

  the game is concentrated on combat, not on shaking the screen.

semp

Offline W7LPNRICK

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2050
      • Ham Radio Antenna Experiments
Re: Me410
« Reply #162 on: July 22, 2012, 10:29:44 PM »
The only difference between DB 605A and 605B is the propeller gear, 605A has an 1,685:1 reduction gear while the 605B has an 1,875:1 reduction gear (i.e. spinning the prop at less rev given the same engine revs).
Similar subvariants were planned for 605AS (605BS) and 605D (605E) and were existing for the DB 601 although with different prop gears.

Wa this done because of discovering super-sonic speeds of the prop tip :headscratch: :headscratch: we fount to be inefficient waste of power?
 :headscratch:
WildWzl
Ft Bragg Jump School-USAF Kunsan AB, Korea- Clark AB P.I.- Korat, Thailand-Tinker AFB Ok.- Mtn Home AFB Idaho
F-86's, F-4D, F-4G, F-5E Tiger II, C-130, UH-1N (Twin Engine Hueys) O-2's. E3A awacs, F-111, FB-111, EF-111,

Offline GScholz

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8910
Re: Me410
« Reply #163 on: July 23, 2012, 05:56:03 AM »
The only difference is from then and now is you aren't accusing HTC of some kind of anti-Luftwaffe bias.



Knew it wouldn't last...
"With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censored, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."

Offline Denniss

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 607
Re: Me410
« Reply #164 on: July 23, 2012, 09:39:00 AM »
Wa this done because of discovering super-sonic speeds of the prop tip :headscratch: :headscratch: we fount to be inefficient waste of power?
 :headscratch:
Must be some airflow efficiency thing. The same engine in different vehicles, one weighting 1 tonne while the other 2 tonnes, would have different transmission ratios optimized for the different weight vehicles. Just guessing - torque vs horsepower.
Early Bf 110 (C/D, equipped with the same engine as the lightweight Bf 109) were known for slow acceleration. AFAIR in the E-series they switched to engines with reduced propeller revs to improve this while (maybe) losing some top speed. I don't know the exact timeframe for this switch, the Bf 110 F/G had those reduced prop rev engines for sure.