I heard from many people who know about airplanes here. like i said before I know nothing about airplanes other than on occasion i watch reviews of airplane crashes on youtube and I am pretty sure the guy making the videos has as much experience flying as I do.
anyway, i have read here from people who have real knowledge and I believe them. on the other hand something bugs me, I've read that pilot training, maintenance, rest of stuff I dont know is may not be as good as here in the us. not saying you guys said it was crappy, just saying it may not be as good as the usa. I hear things like not following "basic rules of flying" or something similar like that caused the crash.
why arent more airplanes crashing in africa, south america, south east asia... and more often. why 2 unlucky sets of crews happen to fly the same airplane type and crash. if subpar training is an issue why the same airplane? why not 2 different types?
I see some fail to even say that pilots caused 99% of the crash, but the airplane "malfunction" or whatever caused the other 1%. boeing being held fully responsible i believe is wrong, on the other hand pilots being held fully responsible by something that started with the airplane is wrong. if both sets of pilots were so poorly trained dont you think they would have crashed any other plane? why arent airplane crashing more often if they are so poorly trained? pretty sure they dont always fly in optimal conditions.
semp