Okay:
US policy makes these drugs illegal. Because of that, Latin American goventments stay out of the drug production business. Therefore, "secondary governments" produce them. The same holds for hte poppy-growing regions like Afghanistan.
Hehe it reminds me of a Reagan 80s news item I saw: wooden cases of freeze-dried weed being shipped with the slogan "Help smoke the Russians out of Afghanistan!" Yeah right.
So now US citizens are to be blamed for the geopolitical results of their government's oppressive policy towards them?
give me a break.
(and, uh, no, the last time I did illegal drugs was so long ago, I could get a pretty good security clearance)
But as amusing as the drug commercials were, the tobacco ones were even better.
Here they are, they've got an easy target: an extremely addictive drug that produces a buttload of nasty medical sideeffects (BTW potheads, smoking dope does too -- and I've experienced a couple of them -- we just don't know what they are, 'cos our Gov't refuses to fund studies to find out), is one of the most physically addictive substances on the planet, and yet they decide to tell half-truths. Cyanide? Arsenic? Sure, but if you've ever burnt the toast, you've exposed yourself to that. How many smokers do you know who've died due to Cyanide poisoning? Uh, dude, to get that kind of concentration of the toxin, there's that small asphyxiation thing that intervenes first. Over a life time? Geez guys, emphysema and lung cancer aren't nasty enough that you have to make up lies?
---
Ultimately, if you're trying to steer kids off drugs, you're doing a noble thing. But if you do so by lying to them, the moment they realize you're lying is the moment you've lost all authority in the matter. In my lifetime, I've smoked a couple cigarettes; I don't buy them regularly, and my consumption of tobacco is hardly measurable. But I saw these commercials with someone who'd never smoked, and after seeing such BS, he turned to me and said "these commercials make me feel like smoking."