Personally, I am leaning more towards "dishonest" than the other two examples.
FWIW, I am not arguing with you regarding the feasibility of SS- I pointed out that you put words in Mietla's mouth, which you have now admitted- nothing more.
You have made yet another blanket generalization about conservatives that shores up my "ignorant" assessment- I am a moderate conservative that is not against SS, nor do I want to see it end. I hope to someday collect some. It still doesn't change that it can arguably be described as welfare, or that it is in serious jeapordy.
If you are a liar I will call you one. If you cannot even quote someone on this board correctly I will call you on it. I don't call you names because I disagree with you- I am giving you the label you have earned. The way you charactarized Mietla was not the way he posted- he gave you straight figures and data, nothing more. You dishonestly turned it into something else.
Yes, I knew there was no benevolent reason for you to ask about my handle and what I flew under. Pray tell, what does that have to do with anything we discuss? Yup, I knew you would throw out the "you don't even fly here, why do you post?" comment. Predictable. We are discussing politics, not AH in the OT. Do I have to fly to have an opinion there? Nope? 'Nuff said.