Author Topic: How many here believe in evolution?  (Read 15552 times)

Offline Griego

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 223
How many here believe in evolution?
« Reply #165 on: December 02, 2002, 01:44:25 AM »
By the way you took my statement out of context since i was replying to some one elses statement on singularities. SENNA.

 but since it started in a singularity then Evolution was started from a singularity. Then Sinularity applies to Evolution also does it not.

 I'm not familar with String theory must be some thing close to chaos theory. at least it sounds like chaos.

Offline senna

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1318
How many here believe in evolution?
« Reply #166 on: December 02, 2002, 01:46:11 AM »
I disagree you can have singularity (in this case universe creation) and not have evolution.

?

:)
« Last Edit: December 02, 2002, 01:48:47 AM by senna »

Offline Griego

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 223
How many here believe in evolution?
« Reply #167 on: December 02, 2002, 01:53:29 AM »
True SENNA, but since it's this universe that came out of such singularity and Evolution is possible according to Darwin. then Evolution is a byproduct of such singularities and said explosion. Or atleast in this Universe correct.


 using the substitution theory.
« Last Edit: December 02, 2002, 01:59:02 AM by Griego »

Offline Griego

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 223
How many here believe in evolution?
« Reply #168 on: December 02, 2002, 01:57:00 AM »
Anyway much fun for me in this thread.

 Thanks davidpt40


 My brain just started to smoke so I must cool it off some how

 beer beer hmmm     I don't even like beer. :D

Offline senna

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1318
How many here believe in evolution?
« Reply #169 on: December 02, 2002, 01:57:07 AM »
Yes but its not a requirement just so happens it occured that way in this case allowing chance for evolution to occur.

:)

Offline Saurdaukar

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8610
      • Army of Muppets
How many here believe in evolution?
« Reply #170 on: December 02, 2002, 02:00:36 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Griego

 Must read Hawking.


 Sorry Saudaukar. :)  I just like to listen to people smarter than myself on a subject that I find intriguing.



Im by no means an expert - I simply find the subject interesting as well and read on it for my own pleasure.  Beyond discussing the theory and possible implications, my knowledge of the actual scientific mechanics is rather limited.

Hawking is mind boggling - but there are other authors whose names I cant recall at this time who explain much of theortical and multidimentional physics in more layman terms.  There is a book called "Hyperspace" (again, lost name of author) which goes into explaing how multidementional travel/existance can be used to combat either the Big Crunch or the Big Freeze.. fancinating stuff.  This of course is the ultimate in "evolutionary thought" as our third dimentional physical self would be a none issue - existance would switch to a different plain which can be mathmatically explained but IMPOSSIBLE to understand by the human mind.  

It would be like asking a two dementional being on a peice of paper to explain concepts such as "up," "down," and "volume."  They wouldnt be able to do it.

In theory, the third dimention could be "explained" to a two dimentional being by drawing a cross consisting of six squares.  Of course, this, when "folded" properly creates a cube, and thus, volume, however this 2D being wouldnt be able to grasp "fold" because it deviated from their laws of physics.  He can only visualize the constuct.

The next most complex dimention cant be understood by us either - it can be "explained" to us by drawing or constructing a 3D "cross" of 8 cubes aranged four long and four on each side of the second to the top cube.  Of course, just as a 2D being cant understand the word "fold" - how could we possibly understand how to "fold" this 3D cross of 8 cubes into what the next dimention actually looks like?  Our perceived laws of physics state that "folding" this object is impossible - just as the 2D being thinks of the third dimention.  

In terms of its implications for surviving the end theories, if a 2D stick figure is drawn on a peice of paper, and you set that peice of paper on fire, the only way for him to escape is to abandon the 2D laws of physics and move OFF the paper by going "up."  In the same way - whatever "up" is in terms of the 3D/4D theory, it is how we will eventually make the correct end theory a non-issue.

This also plays into how space and time change as you pass the event horizon of a black hole and draw nearer to the singularity.  Our 3D laws of physics cant explain (and thus, we cannot understand) what is actually happening at the singularity because our minds cant grasp a "hole" in three dimentional space.  Existance at the singularity is thought to be impossible by us because of the enormous force of gravity and as a result, the warping of physical matter as well as both space AND time - but in reality, we have no clue whats going on.  We can "explain" this (or confuse the issue further depending on your viewpoint) by going into what actually changes as time and space are altered.  

Theoretically, for example, it would be possible to "view" the past using light.  If you were on a spacecraft which was equipt with a telescope of infinate power which was able to exceed the speed of light (whole nother issue) you could outrun the light from Earth from 50 years ago and "tune in" to the light from August 1945 and watch two certain portions of Japan light up.  (as an interesting supliment, a space craft traveling at the speed of light can circumvent the ENTIRE visual/known universe in 56 years ship time - once you return to Earth, however, Sol (the sun) would be but a crisp, and Earth would be an icecube.  This is all because speed changes gravitational forces and gravity alters time.)

However, if time and space are altered to the extent that they are "in" (we dont know the proper term - again - "up" to 2D being) the singularity, existance cannot be measured by space OR time.  It simply stops.  What then?  How do you measure existance without time?  This is difficult for most people to grasp because time is what we measure EVERYTHING by - only not many people understand that time is not constant.  Gravity is what the universe is measured by - it effects EVERYTHING in one way or another.

The singularity of a black hole "goes" somewhere, but we arent quite sure where.  The matter/energy "swallowed up" by a black hole appears to "disappear" - only page one, book one, of science 101 states "matter cannot be created or destroyed" so we are able to "explain" but we are NOT able to "understand" what is happening.

Isnt this more fun than discussing whether or not God took ribs out of Adam's chest and created woman?  Besides... Im sure feminists will succeed in getting that taken out of the Bible in 10 years anyway.  ;)

Flame on.

Offline Griego

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 223
How many here believe in evolution?
« Reply #171 on: December 02, 2002, 02:01:49 AM »
Yes but in a CHAOTIC Universe chance is implied is it not.

Offline Hortlund

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4690
How many here believe in evolution?
« Reply #172 on: December 02, 2002, 02:02:51 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Karnak
You either completely fail to understand basic scientific method, are intentionally dishonest or are an idiot.
[/b]
OR you dont know what you are talking about.
Quote

I'm betting on the first option as it seems to be the common denominator linking all the creationists I have talked to.  Science is not conducted via the legal system.  Inane refutations like yours carry no weight in science.

Point the first, no, that is not the way it works.  In science when a theory has been put forth for peer review, as the Theory of Evolution has been, it is then that it can be disproven by finding data that breaks the theory.  In the case of the Theory of Evolution no such evidence has yet been found.
[/b]
Actually, it is you who seem to lack a very basic and fundamental understanding on how the scientific method works.

Example:
Theory by Steve put forth for peer review.
There are several species of invisible, mute birds that live in the atmosphere at altitudes above 20 000 feet.

So now it is up to you to disprove it, otherwise it is a scientific fact?

The scientific method works the other way around. If I'm presenting a theory, it is up to me to prove that I'm right.

Also, Karnak, humor me here, is it possible to prove the non-existance of anyting?
Quote

Point the second, no we did not agree that the is no evidence in the fossil record.  We agreed that the fossil record in human posession is incomplete.  There is some supporting data in the fossil record.
[/b]
So the combination of "the fossile record is incomplete" and "there is some supporting data in the fossil record" =evidence according to Karnaks scientific method?
Quote

All that aside, the strongest evidence in in the form of molecular biology and observed evolution.
Ahh yes, the molecules. They evolved too right...? From "the primordeal soup" maybe? Probably without even realizing it, you put the finger on the most obvious and damaging weakness in the entire theory of evolution. The inability to explain the origins of the protein.

Offline Griego

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 223
How many here believe in evolution?
« Reply #173 on: December 02, 2002, 02:12:40 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Saurdaukar
Im by no means an expert - I simply find the subject interesting as well and read on it for my own pleasure.  Beyond discussing the theory and possible implications, my knowledge of the actual scientific mechanics is rather limited.

Hawking is mind boggling - but there are other authors whose names I cant recall at this time who explain much of theortical and multidimentional physics in more layman terms.  There is a book called "Hyperspace" (again, lost name of author) which goes into explaing how multidementional travel/existance can be used to combat either the Big Crunch or the Big Freeze.. fancinating stuff.  This of course is the ultimate in "evolutionary thought" as our third dimentional physical self would be a none issue - existance would switch to a different plain which can be mathmatically explained but IMPOSSIBLE to understand by the human mind.  

It would be like asking a two dementional being on a peice of paper to explain concepts such as "up," "down," and "volume."  They wouldnt be able to do it.

In theory, the third dimention could be "explained" to a two dimentional being by drawing a cross consisting of six squares.  Of course, this, when "folded" properly creates a cube, and thus, volume, however this 2D being wouldnt be able to grasp "fold" because it deviated from their laws of physics.  He can only visualize the constuct.

The next most complex dimention cant be understood by us either - it can be "explained" to us by drawing or constructing a 3D "cross" of 8 cubes aranged four long and four on each side of the second to the top cube.  Of course, just as a 2D being cant understand the word "fold" - how could we possibly understand how to "fold" this 3D cross of 8 cubes into what the next dimention actually looks like?  Our perceived laws of physics state that "folding" this object is impossible - just as the 2D being thinks of the third dimention.  

In terms of its implications for surviving the end theories, if a 2D stick figure is drawn on a peice of paper, and you set that peice of paper on fire, the only way for him to escape is to abandon the 2D laws of physics and move OFF the paper by going "up."  In the same way - whatever "up" is in terms of the 3D/4D theory, it is how we will eventually make the correct end theory a non-issue.

This also plays into how space and time change as you pass the event horizon of a black hole and draw nearer to the singularity.  Our 3D laws of physics cant explain (and thus, we cannot understand) what is actually happening at the singularity because our minds cant grasp a "hole" in three dimentional space.  Existance at the singularity is thought to be impossible by us because of the enormous force of gravity and as a result, the warping of physical matter as well as both space AND time - but in reality, we have no clue whats going on.  We can "explain" this (or confuse the issue further depending on your viewpoint) by going into what actually changes as time and space are altered.  

Theoretically, for example, it would be possible to "view" the past using light.  If you were on a spacecraft which was equipt with a telescope of infinate power which was able to exceed the speed of light (whole nother issue) you could outrun the light from Earth from 50 years ago and "tune in" to the light from August 1945 and watch two certain portions of Japan light up.  (as an interesting supliment, a space craft traveling at the speed of light can circumvent the ENTIRE visual/known universe in 56 years ship time - once you return to Earth, however, Sol (the sun) would be but a crisp, and Earth would be an icecube.  This is all because speed changes gravitational forces and gravity alters time.)

However, if time and space are altered to the extent that they are "in" (we dont know the proper term - again - "up" to 2D being) the singularity, existance cannot be measured by space OR time.  It simply stops.  What then?  How do you measure existance without time?  This is difficult for most people to grasp because time is what we measure EVERYTHING by - only not many people understand that time is not constant.  Gravity is what the universe is measured by - it effects EVERYTHING in one way or another.

The singularity of a black hole "goes" somewhere, but we arent quite sure where.  The matter/energy "swallowed up" by a black hole appears to "disappear" - only page one, book one, of science 101 states "matter cannot be created or destroyed" so we are able to "explain" but we are NOT able to "understand" what is happening.

Isnt this more fun than discussing whether or not God took ribs out of Adam's chest and created woman?  Besides... Im sure feminists will succeed in getting that taken out of the Bible in 10 years anyway.  ;)

Flame on.


 I alway thought that Time is the 4D and not some abligatory Deminsion that no one knows about. and then 5D is speed. Am I wrong in assuming this.

No matter cannot be created or destroyed but it can be changed to a different state. Energy. So Energy can probably be stored in a singularity much easier than matter in it cool stage.

Offline Vulcan

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9915
How many here believe in evolution?
« Reply #174 on: December 02, 2002, 02:38:06 AM »
I'm sorry ammo but it is a FACT.

I've seen a write up on an experiment over 60 years, involved small finches, where scientists fed the birds via 'fake' flowers, they did things like vary the flower length, so that those birds that had long beaks would be favoured. And other things where birds with short beaks would be favoured (like tough seeds).

In all of the experiments, natural selection prevailed. Where a long beak was advantageous the birds ended up a group with much longer beaks. And with the tough seed group visa versa. They started with a base group and ended up with two totally different beaked groups of birds, all in just 60 years.

Natural selection, and evolution, shown at work.

There have been many other similar experiments. Close your eyes and shake your head as much as you like, the earth is not flat dude.

Quote
Originally posted by -ammo-
evolution is NOT fact.  It is theory.



Sardaukar, re: the big bang theory. There have been some updates. I believe one of them is that as the universe is expanding it is accelerating - and its unlikely that there will be a big collapse. The big 'balloon' theory (infinitely inflating and collapsing universe) is old school. The new school is in a chaos based universe with some sort of massive explosion based on the random 'existance' of anti-matter. Stuff way out of my league but fascinating none the less.

Up shot of it is they now believe the universe will keep expanding, forever.

Offline Griego

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 223
How many here believe in evolution?
« Reply #175 on: December 02, 2002, 02:51:26 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by AKIron
I'm no physicist but it seems to me that the gravitational force generated by all the mass in the known universe wouldn't simply give way even to what must have been an unimaginable amount of energy. Rather, it seems to me there would have become an equilibrium. At least until some unaccounted for additional force were added to the mix.

 
 ya got me think on this i think i spoke to soon on this subject with an earlier post.

 If it was a singularity and it was all that there was then were does the unaccounted additional force come from?

 where you say that the gravitational force generated by all the mass in the know universe wouldn't simply give way even to what must have been an unimaginable amount of energy. Rather,it seems to me there would have become and equilibrium.

 Since Mass or matter is energy and all that energy is compressed into a zero volume with infinite density equilibrium would be the farthest thing i could think it would be. when energy is compressed something would have to give. a fussion explosion might be in what started it all . In a fussion explosion there is no additional force required to be added. a fission explosion yes and since it was a the only thing there was nothing else then a fussion explosion would be the only logical thing that started the universe.

 Which lead to evolution. had to throw that in since i've hijacked this thread enough. :)
« Last Edit: December 02, 2002, 03:03:02 AM by Griego »

Offline Griego

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 223
How many here believe in evolution?
« Reply #176 on: December 02, 2002, 02:59:37 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Vulcan
Up shot of it is they now believe the universe will keep expanding, forever. [/B]
 

 In this explanation It would lead to cold death. Not Heat death as in the old school version.


 with the universe expanding forever. it will gradually cool down to the point where it will be inimical to life as we know it. then Evolution is no Longer or we will evolve to be able to cope with cold.

Offline Hortlund

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4690
How many here believe in evolution?
« Reply #177 on: December 02, 2002, 03:07:40 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Samm
Are you purposely being this way ? The process of natural selection IS evolution . Animals with weak cardio vascular systems don't breed well, in fact they rarely reach sexual maturity, thus their genes are filtered from the pool . Pre girraffes with longer than average necks ate better and prospered . Stretch this proccess out for a few hundred million years and you get long necked animals feeding on tree tops .

All mammals have the same number of neck vertebre btw. Mouse, whale, monkey, girraffe, all have 7 neck vertebrea .


Allow me to try to explain more clearly what I mean.

Because the neck of the Giraffe extends so high into the air, the heart must contain an extraordinarily strong pump to force the blood from the lower body to the highest reaches of the brain.

When the giraffe lowers its neck to drink, the blood that is circulating in its neck will suddenly come rushing down by the force of gravity. This sudden rush of blood is so strong, it would quickly cause the giraffe to suffer a brain aneurysm, killing the animal instantly. Therefore, spigots are built into his neck arteries that instantly close down whenever the animal lowers its neck to drink water.

However, this is not enough. When the giraffe abruptly raises its head after drinking, the blood would flow so rapidly downward through the force of gravity that the animal would suffer a sudden loss of blood to the brain, thus causing him to pass out immediately. To prevent this, the brain has a sponge-like material just behind the brain that has gradually been absorbing blood all the time the giraffe was drinking. When the giraffe suddenly raises his head, that blood very slowly drains out of the brain, thus keeping the giraffe from passing out, while the spigots open up and the blood begins to flow naturally.

What I was trying to say was this:  This is a bit more complicated than the cardio vascular system found in any other animal. And it is would be misleading to try to simplify this into a  question about a weak cardio vascular system.

The question Im aiming at is "how did this system evolve"? Here, natural selection cannot help because the valves are useless until functional. Same goes for that sponge in its head.

Natural selection cannot do much until there is a functioning valve-system. The only way that could appear is by a lucky mutation.

Offline senna

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1318
How many here believe in evolution?
« Reply #178 on: December 02, 2002, 03:08:25 AM »
Yes Grieger. Its like when monkeys climbed down from the trees they also adapted and had shorter limbs amongst other primates.

:)

Offline Griego

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 223
How many here believe in evolution?
« Reply #179 on: December 02, 2002, 03:16:43 AM »
N=s(*^^%&^##@JJ aiidlk(^%^%*


 my head hurts got to go to sleep.