The way I see it, every game has it's own problems.
WWIIOL's are the 64 limit, stuka bug, possibly slightly overmodeled rudder (which honestly doesn't bother me much) just to name a few. I'm sure AH has it's own.
Was it wrong for Zero and hardcase to come here and do nothing but harp on the problems of AH, if it was done in a derogitory or infamitory way, absolutely. (assuming that's what they did from what I heard, I haven't seen it). By the same right, I think it's wrong for people using "free trials" of WWIIOL to do nothing but harp about the bugs in the forums over there.
the point is, everyone is entitled to their own oppinions, and don't judge the views of an entire community on the actions of a few dinks.
People like diferent games for diferent reasons. I know many people who play WWIIOL for the 24/7 action and the "big picture" aspect. I know people who play IL-2 for the quick dogfight aspect. I'm sure there are many reasons people like AH or WB better than both of these games. I got no problem with it, and I got no problem with someone comming into the WWIIOL forums and saying "hey, there's a new version of AH out, yall should try it", or "check out this WB3 video" or " there's a new patch for IL-2 out".