Originally posted by beet1e
s'funny, I could have sworn Charlotte just said something....
... or maybe it was just some hot air.
So Charlotte, now you're saying you knew all about the Thames Barrier before I mentioned it, or am I assuming too much - again?
Yeah, skuzz and shucks. The earth's warming up, the ice is melting, sea levels rising...
... and that 6bn tonnes of CO2 we release each year has got nothing to do with it.
Mmmm, didn't I already explain why all the theories about manmade co2 in the atmosphere are so ridiculously full of holes?
Like I said, I don't honestly know the full story about that ice analysis.
Yeah, in fact I did, but you didn't understand it appearently. So, if you don't understand it, obviously it must be a problem.
Want to sign my petition for banning Dihydrogen Monoxide? Members of the Sierra Club, PETA, Greenpeace, HGAC have all signed... recently I got a good collection of signatures from ANSWER, Not In Our Name, & Code Pink (stopped at a protest I saw going on). My most spectacular results getting it signed came in '02 at the Rice Environmental Conference. Afterall, it is used in nuclear power plants, by the US navy in some propulsion systems, pesticides, it causes you to sweat excessively, urinate excessively, causes soil erosion, causes severe burns in a gaseous state, and can kill you due to accidental inhilation of even small quantities. The KKK & NAACP have used it in their rallies and marches, in Hilter's death camps, WW2 prison camps, by the Serbs as authorized by Slobodan during their ethnic cleansing campaign... It's so dangerous that the MSDS says you need a labcoat & protective glasses to handle it, and it must be stored in a very tightly sealed container.
For those that missed it, Dihyrogen Monoxide is also known as Dihydrogen Oxide, Hydrogen Hydroxide, Hydronium Hydroxide, or simply Hydric acid. Normally, we just call it water.
Bottomline is, nobody knows the truth, but to say something is a problem with absolutely no way to substantiate it is ... very troll-ish
I'm a skeptic. I want to be concinved. I demand it. However, posting data that can be debunked in 5 minutes with a google search is the exact opposite of a convincing arguement. If somebody could just get me some data that proves the issue either way, I'll be a happy camper (or a concerned environmentalist).