Author Topic: Rumsfeld survival and the shot down 9-11 plane in Pennsylvania (Read 7470 times)

Sox62 · « **Reply #105 on:** January 09, 2005, 05:19:58 PM »

You better run and hide,right now.

We have dispatched the black helicopters.

JB88 · « **Reply #106 on:** January 09, 2005, 05:35:07 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Sox62
You better run and hide,right now.

We have dispatched the black helicopters.

they better be well armed.

genozaur · « **Reply #107 on:** January 09, 2005, 05:38:26 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Sox62
You better run and hide,right now.

We have dispatched the black helicopters.

You should had done it on 9-11, Sucks92.

Sox62 · « **Reply #108 on:** January 09, 2005, 06:03:17 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by genozaur
You should had done it on 9-11, Sucks92.

Bwahahaha!!!

Very witty!!!

I'm sure those who have lost family on 9/11 will appreciate your rapier wit.

Sucks when you have to resort to insults when your argument is weak,doesn't it?

JB88 · « **Reply #109 on:** January 09, 2005, 06:08:44 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Sox62

Sucks when you have to resort to insults when your argument is weak,doesn't it?

"Really this guy has got to be a troll or is an all out nut. Look how he says that he never read anything about any 93 conspiracy until after we started attacking his views in this thread"

"Is it true that people who use only CAPS have little dicks?"

"genozaur
Yer crap is unfounded...so stick yer head back into yer asss."

""Lets not argue or reason with the lunatics, just ridicule them..."

"genozaur you are a lunatic, seek help..."

genozaur · « **Reply #110 on:** January 09, 2005, 06:11:45 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Sox62
Bwahahaha!!!

Very witty!!!

I'm sure those who have lost family on 9/11 will appreciate your rapier wit.

Sucks when you have to resort to insults when your argument is weak,doesn't it?

Sox, you started it. Or maybe you already forgot that YOU were trying to be witty ?

And BTW, I did not have any argument with you.
Sorry for misspelling your name. What's your name again ?

Elfie · « **Reply #111 on:** January 09, 2005, 06:12:14 PM »

Some of the things said dont add up. Some things said were later retracted. I think some of the confusion on that fateful day is to be expected. No one ever anticipated a terrorist attack of that magnitude.

The only reason I can think of for the gov't to NOT tell us if they did in fact shoot down flight 93 is the possiblity of the *heros* taking flight 93 out of the equation.

How could you not shoot down a civilian airliner that had obviously been hijacked and was headed towards Washington DC or any other heavy population center?

I admit, I would not relish the thought of being the one to have to issue such an order, nor would I want to be the one to have to carry out such an order.

That said, links provided in this post have not provided any proof of flight 93's demise, they only speculate.

Sox62 · « **Reply #112 on:** January 09, 2005, 06:13:08 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by genozaur
Sox, you started it. Or maybe you already forgot that YOU were trying to be witty ?

And BTW, I did not have any argument with you.
Sorry for misspelling your name. What's your name again ?

Show me where I made a personal insult.

Sox62 · « **Reply #113 on:** January 09, 2005, 06:14:49 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by JB88
they better be well armed.

They are.

We have equipped them with Phaser technology that we removed from the UFO we have at Area 51.

You are doomed.

genozaur · « **Reply #114 on:** January 09, 2005, 06:20:04 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Sox62
Show me where I made a personal insult.

You have just joined a heated argument, bringing in some unpleasant threats against MY PERSON.
To rebuff you with a personal tongue-twister was the lesser of my sins.

JB88 · « **Reply #115 on:** January 09, 2005, 06:22:59 PM »

well said elfie. i think you hit upon something important with the "hero" statement espescially.

but wouldnt you agree that some of these events are odd? speculative yes. but so are the theories on the kennedy assasination. most of us have a theory and i am guessing that at least half have come around to think that it probably wasnt just oswald. though it is always easy to laugh at those whose natural curiosity extends beyond what big brother says, it is extremely vital that we question it.

in reference to kennedy...someone willingly denied our vote for thier own interest. were people not to question it or authority in general, the world would get ugly enough that some idiot might actually get a chance to call out the copters.

and frankly, i find the joke itself to be funny...but the reality of it, the possibility... is so totally un-american.

end rant.

Sox62 · « **Reply #116 on:** January 09, 2005, 06:23:08 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by genozaur
You have just joined a heated argument, bringing in some unpleasant threats against MY PERSON.
To rebuff you with a personal tongue-twister was the lesser of my sins.

I have?

Where.

Feel free to quote and report them.

But much like your theory,they don't actually exist.

JB88 · « **Reply #117 on:** January 09, 2005, 06:25:46 PM »

Question to those slaming the author of this thread.

have you read any of the material that i have posted?

just curious.

if i am wrong to think that there is something there, i would like to see those rebutted. (and not just in a "pick out one flaw, debunk the whole concept" way either. that wont convince me.

thanks in advance.

Martlet · « **Reply #118 on:** January 09, 2005, 06:31:10 PM »

Often one flaw can debunk a whole concept.

Ignoring what people have said isn't the same as winning an argument.

JB88 · « **Reply #119 on:** January 09, 2005, 06:38:01 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Martlet
Often one flaw can debunk a whole concept.

Ignoring what people have said isn't the same as winning an argument.

i agree that it can debunk a "specific" concept. but not that eliminating a small part of an arguement can alleviate the problem presented in the initial question.

ignoring what people have said is not only not the same as winning, it is outright non participation.