Author Topic: Question to Finns  (Read 29062 times)

Offline Siaf__csf

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2213
Question to Finns
« Reply #285 on: March 14, 2005, 01:28:25 PM »
I'm sure all the baltic countries were just pleased your nice government saw it fit to come and torture, imprison and oppress the inhabitants.

I'm sure that each Baltic country was just happy to remain under russian influence after the break up of soviet union.

No.. wait.. what happened?

Offline Toad

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18415
Question to Finns
« Reply #286 on: March 14, 2005, 01:30:45 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Boroda
I don't see any difference. I also want you to enlighten me about "open warfare and murder" between Poland and USSR in 1939. I need to read some stories about great battles between brave Polish warriors and evil Soviets, with blood and gutters all over the border.
[/b]

Oh, you guys did a great job of lying to the Poles.

Quote
There existed between Poland and the Soviet Republic a pact of non-aggression dated July 25,1932, which on May 5, 1934, was extended until December 31, 1945


If that wasn't enough to lull them into trusting you,

Quote
On August 27 Izvestia published an interview with Marshal Vorosilov who stated that the new understanding with Germany would not prevent Russia from supplying raw materials and even war materials to Poland...But complete tranquillity reigned in the Eastern Provinces of Poland. Mobilisation had taken place under normal conditions and perfectly smoothly; all public authorities were functioning without interruption...

....In any event, the entrance of the Russian troops was such a surprise, not only to the population but also to the civil and military authorities, that in many places it was thought that the Bolsheviks had entered Poland as allies against Nazi Germany.


Quote
Sorry, but by Sept, 16th, Poland was only a "geographical concept". Sad but true.
[/b]

Yeah, the Germans invaded on Sept 1. I don't suppose you could have told the Poles you were going to fight with them against the Nazis and actually DONE that. You could have offered to move troops to the front with Polish permission and fought. Instead, you waited nearly three weeks and then invaded the Poles.

Fighting? I know Polish troops were fighting the Red Army at Lvov and surrendered on 22 September.

Quote
Polish border defences forces (Korpus Ochrony Pogranicza) in the east (about 25 battalions) were unable to defend the border and were ordered by Edward Rydz-Smigly to fall back. This however did not prevent some clashes and small battles.

The Soviet invasion was one of the decisive factors that convinced the Polish government that the war in Poland was lost. Prior to the Soviet attack from the East, the Polish military plan called for long-term defence against Germany in the southern-eastern part of the Poland (near the Romanian border), while awaiting relief from an attack on the western border of Germany by the Western Allies. Facing two powerful enemies - Nazi Germany and Soviet Union - the Polish government decided that it was impossible to carry out the defence on Polish territories and ordered all units to evacuate Poland and reorganize in France.



Why don't we ask some of the Polish posters here how it went?  

Quote
How did they expect USSR to help Poland against Germany without entering Polish territory?
[/b]

The Red Army would have to enter Poland to help them. The Red Army DID NOT have to enter Poland to attack them. That's not help.

Quote
[/b]2) Leave Poland alone, let nazis seize it all and have nazi army at the gates. Also that meant leaving Baltic states to nazis and having them 100km from Leningrad in case of war. Definetly not the best decision.


:rofl  Like it MATTERED! Not!

Barbarossa jumped off on June 22, 1941, ~21 months after the USSR stabbed Poland in the back and invaded. In those 21 months, Russia suppled Nazi Germany with war materials.

On June 24, Army Group North had the 56th Panzer Corps all the way to the Dvinsk highway. One hundred and five miles deep in Russian territory.

June 27, Minsk, the capital of Byelorussia, well behind West Front's original defensive lines, is taken by the Panzer forces of Army Group Center. In less than a week, Hoth's and Guderian's Panzer Groups have met, closing a giant pincer at Minsk, some two hundred and thirty miles deep in Soviet territory.

Oh yeah... stabbing Poland in the back really held the Nazis back.TWO WHOLE DAYS before the Nazis were through your gates with Army Group North. This after you had two years to prepare... except of course you didn't prepare.

If Hilter the putz hadn't delayed Barbarossa to deal with Yugoslavia, Moscow would likely have fallen. The whole story might be different then.  So betraying Poland gained you nothing.

Quote
So - we had to give up land that was so vital in 1941[/quote

The land you stabbed Poland in the back to get cost the Nazis about one day to take in Barbarossa. Vital? Pfffft.

You'd have done better to let the Nazi have all of Poland, realize the threat and actually prepared to meet them at your borders.
If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!

Offline Boroda

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5755
Question to Finns
« Reply #287 on: March 14, 2005, 01:31:56 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Fishu
Yeah well, it was a democratic decision to turn down the offer. Whats the problem with that? It was our democratic fault not to get the benefit of offered money and several times more land.
It still doesn't give a reason to attack, it was a democratic decision after all, like you like to say in the case of the baltic republics.


Yes, it was a decision of your democraticaly-elected government. But one totalitarian leader, a general of evil Imperial Russian army warned this government and said in advance what will happen... The "democratically-elected" government didn't listen, and killed thousands of it's citizens only to agree to pre-war offers in a hurry, when a predicted defeat became obvious...

True advantages of Democracy on parade!

Quote
Originally posted by Fishu
I don't recall any pacts with UK and France, other than buying off outdated equiptment and getting some antique for free. Like french machineguns which were so unfit for battle that even in the lack finns didn't use those in the frontline duty.
and of course some talks about sending UK reinforcements to Finland, which is debated to be just an excuse to secure *cough*occupy*cough* swedish ore mines and deny it from the nazi-Germany.


Fishu, I kindly ask you to sit down, I'll reveal one of the greatest secrets of European politics of XX century.

You already said that "allies" planned a landing operation to help Finland. Alles were: France, UK, and... drumroll!!! Polish government in London!!!

This is what scared Stalin to death! This is a true reason that Finland wasn't occupied! Hidden secret finally revealed!

:rofl

Offline Siaf__csf

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2213
Question to Finns
« Reply #288 on: March 14, 2005, 01:37:07 PM »
So what you're saying basically, Boroda, is that in fear of the allied landing on finland, Soviet union had to attack it in order to protect the best interest of its (then)current ally, nazi Germany.

Offline Toad

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18415
Question to Finns
« Reply #289 on: March 14, 2005, 01:38:17 PM »
Siaf,

:)
If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!

Offline Fishu

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3789
Question to Finns
« Reply #290 on: March 14, 2005, 01:43:17 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Boroda
Yes, it was a decision of your democraticaly-elected government. But one totalitarian leader, a general of evil Imperial Russian army warned this government and said in advance what will happen... The "democratically-elected" government didn't listen, and killed thousands of it's citizens only to agree to pre-war offers in a hurry, when a predicted defeat became obvious...

True advantages of Democracy on parade!


So we're again back to the gun point... :rolleyes:
I fail to see what democracy it is when a country is forced aka threatened with occupation.
By those stantards the world would be nothing but a big totalitarian country, had Stalin had it his way. Yet somehow people would disagree with his government and most definately wouldn't want to be part of the USSR.
By the ways of democracy, these people should be living in the republics of their choice and not as a part of the USSR.

Shows what kind of history people in the USSR have been taught.
Apparently you don't know anything about the democracy.

 
Quote

You already said that "allies" planned a landing operation to help Finland. Alles were: France, UK, and... drumroll!!! Polish government in London!!!
 


Huh? I don't understand what is your point..
"You already said that..."  ...huh? Mind to rewind a little...
« Last Edit: March 14, 2005, 01:48:25 PM by Fishu »

Offline Boroda

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5755
Question to Finns
« Reply #291 on: March 14, 2005, 01:44:41 PM »
Toad, please re-read what you posted in a message above.

I fail to see any logics or a trace of common sence there. Look at this and try to think about it:

Boroda:  How did they expect USSR to help Poland against Germany without entering Polish territory?

Toad: The Red Army would have to enter Poland to help them. The Red Army DID NOT have to enter Poland to attack them. That's not help.


Hmm. Poles didn't want Soviet troops to enter Polish terrotory. That was the "point" that, as you said before, prevented "allies" from signing an agreement with USSR (while we both know their delegation wasn't authorised to sign anything). So - they don't want us to "enter Poland", and at the same time  they need it badly? I admit that Polish government could suffer from epidemic schizophrenia, but even in such a case - it's hard to blame Soviet Union for it.

Good idea for a conspirological novel: Secret NKVD labs developed a schizophrenia virus, designed to infect high government officials, Poles were the forst victims, then most of the Western governments got this disease, and in early 70s the virus stroke back, Brezhnev got it while kissing Carter or Nixon! Sounds a little more reasonable then your posts, doesn't it? :D

Offline Suave

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2950
Question to Finns
« Reply #292 on: March 14, 2005, 01:47:57 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Fishu

The Lithuanian SSR ceased to exist. Vytautas Landsbergis became the head of the state and Kazimiera Prunskienė led the Cabinet of Ministers. On March 15 the U.S.S.R. demanded revocation of the act and began employing political and economic sanctions against Lithuania as well as demonstrating military force. Lithuanians, inspired by their government, protested against Soviet actions by using peaceful means and not trying to use some extreme or gun shifts. On January 10, 1991, U.S.S.R. authorities seized the main publishing house and other premises in Vilnius and attempted to suppress the elected government by sponsoring a so called National Salvation Committee.
. [/B]


Hey somebody finally captioned my pic. Yeah, USSR figured the world was too busy in the persian gulf in 1991 to notice if they pulled another annexation. But thankfully it failed. Oh well the soviets got to kill some Lithuanian police and run over protesters with tanks and break into TV stations and shoot the occupants. Just like old times.

Thankfully a great man named Yeltsin soon became president. He would decry the invasion of lituania as barbarism, he was awarded the 13th of January medal for this. Another great thing he did was to ban the communist party from elections. Thanks to great men like him, some day Russia will rise from the rubble that was the criminal organization called the USSR. An organization that inflicted more darkness and grief onto humanity than any other.

Offline Boroda

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5755
Question to Finns
« Reply #293 on: March 14, 2005, 01:49:57 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Siaf__csf
So what you're saying basically, Boroda, is that in fear of the allied landing on finland, Soviet union had to attack it in order to protect the best interest of its (then)current ally, nazi Germany.


Hmm.

Interesting point of view.

We can watch how history is rewritten, live. Looks like people who write Western "history" books suffer from the same hallucinations as you.

Hint: "allies" planned  to send troops to Finland against USSR in Spring, 1940.

Offline Suave

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2950
Question to Finns
« Reply #294 on: March 14, 2005, 01:51:38 PM »
BTW how many countries did the soviets steal or try to steal? We'll exclude russia since that's a given.

Latvia,Estonia,Poland,Hungary,Afghanistan,Lithuania,Finland,Ukraine

There's so many, I can't remember them all at once. Help me out guys.

Offline Toad

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18415
Question to Finns
« Reply #295 on: March 14, 2005, 01:51:58 PM »
I think you should reread what I posted.

The Poles may not have wanted Soviet troops to cross their territory when a German invasion was only a possibility. After the Germans actually invaded, they may have changed their minds, no?

IF you read what I posted, the Poles at first though you Soviets WERE coming to help fight the Germans.

Remember this?

Quote
On August 27 Izvestia published an interview with Marshal Vorosilov who stated that the new understanding with Germany would not prevent Russia from supplying raw materials and even war materials to Poland
,

Lied to them and fooled them, didn't yas?

Secondly, the USSR gained little if anything at all by taking Poland... except endless shame... as it made no difference when Barbarossa jumped off. They kicked your axes all the way back to Moscow in short order. The only thing that saved Moscow was Hitler-the-putz deciding to delay Barbarossa for 4 weeks in order to deal with a relatively minor situation in Yugoslavia.

So, you stabbed Poland in the back and gained... nothing except shame.
If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!

Offline Boroda

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5755
Question to Finns
« Reply #296 on: March 14, 2005, 01:56:01 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Suave
Hey somebody finally captioned my pic. Yeah, USSR figured the world was too busy in the persian gulf in 1991 to notice if they pulled another annexation. But thankfully it failed. Oh well the soviets got to kill some Lithuanian police and run over protesters with tanks and break into TV stations and shoot the occupants. Just like old times.


Funny. Lithuanian nationalists now admit that during the "siege of TV center" Soviet soldiers and protesters were shot by provocators.

Quote
Originally posted by Suave
Thankfully a great man named Yeltsin soon became president. He would decry the invasion of lituania as barbarism, he was awarded the 13th of January medal for this. Another great thing he did was to ban the communist party from elections. Thanks to great men like him, some day Russia will rise from the rubble that was the criminal organization called the USSR. An organization that inflicted more darkness and grief onto humanity than any other.


I hope I have a right to disagree, don't I?

Yeltsin banning communist party from elections? Funny. He banned CPSU. CPRF is still OK and is the only serious party that gets a place in parliament. I don't count clowns like Zhirinovsky and puppets from "Rodina".

Great men like Yeltsin? Sure, he's bigger then me, and he can drink more. Unfortunately it was his main occupation in 91-99.

Offline Fishu

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3789
Question to Finns
« Reply #297 on: March 14, 2005, 01:56:13 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Toad
So, you stabbed Poland in the back and gained... nothing except shame.


It was a democratic misconcept by the poles, not the SU's fault :D

Offline Boroda

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5755
Question to Finns
« Reply #298 on: March 14, 2005, 02:00:54 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Suave
BTW how many countries did the soviets steal or try to steal? We'll exclude russia since that's a given.

Latvia,Estonia,Poland,Hungary,Afghanistan,Lithuania,Finland,Ukraine

There's so many, I can't remember them all at once. Help me out guys.


Yes. Ukraine. Definetly Ukraine.

:rofl

I like a term you used, "steal". Steal from allmighty US of A? A nation chosen by god? :lol

OK, I add Tuva to your list. Homework: try to find it on the map and research how and when it joined Evil USSR. If you collect stamps - search for stamps from Tuva. :lol

Offline Suave

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2950
Question to Finns
« Reply #299 on: March 14, 2005, 02:01:10 PM »
There's a monument in what used to be east germany, the locals call it "tomb of the unknown rapist".