Author Topic: Red or Blue? (Read 1725 times)

GtoRA2 · « **Reply #60 on:** April 07, 2006, 01:36:32 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Captain Virgil Hilts
Your presumption that Republicans fear everything is the largest pile of Bravo Sierra found anywhere in this thread. Except possibly you. Fear and dislike are two entirely different things. Just as fear and knowing something is wrong are two different things. Far be it from your pompous bellybutton to grasp that small tidbit of knowledge. Have a nice day.

*stands and applauds Savage*

lazs2 · « **Reply #61 on:** April 07, 2006, 02:50:47 PM »

I think that the joke works because so many "liberals" and democrats all feel that the solution to freedom is banning things in order to make people get along and depending on someone else to take care of their responsibilities.

lazs

Debonair · « **Reply #62 on:** April 07, 2006, 03:40:29 PM »

i like that joke about the bear & the rabbit defecating in the woods

Holden McGroin · « **Reply #63 on:** April 07, 2006, 03:58:38 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by ChickenHawk
If you find a joke about confused, weed smoking hippies disturbing, then go read some jokes about mullet wearing, dixie flag waving rednecks until you feel better.

I would think a mullet would tend to limit the sun's rays ability to burn one's neck, so having a mullet and a red neck would be virtually impossible.

ChickenHawk · « **Reply #64 on:** April 07, 2006, 04:27:01 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Holden McGroin
I would think a mullet would tend to limit the sun's rays ability to burn one's neck, so having a mullet and a red neck would be virtually impossible.

good point.

J_A_B · « **Reply #65 on:** April 07, 2006, 09:15:07 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by nirvana
"Blow his freaking head off".

That ain't gonna happen with a Glock .40.

Shoot into your target's center of mass. If he's worth shooting once, he's worth shooting twice.

Incedentally, I think it's some sort of trick question, because everyone knows no self-respecting Republican would carry a Glock. They all have 1911's or S&W's or other "manly" guns, don't they?

Oh,and I wonder how you're supposed to immediately know that the bad guy is an "Islamic Terrorist" and not just a typical nutjob with a knife. Do terrorists carry big signs on their backs like samurai used to?

J_A_B

Debonair · « **Reply #66 on:** April 07, 2006, 11:59:17 PM »

why did samurai have big "islamic terrorist" signs on them?
some crude form of counterintelligence?

FiLtH · « **Reply #67 on:** April 08, 2006, 01:38:16 AM »

Take the gun out of the equation and make it so the terrorist just has his fists. Same results I think.

Captain Virgil Hilts · « **Reply #68 on:** April 08, 2006, 08:39:25 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by FiLtH
Take the gun out of the equation and make it so the terrorist just has his fists. Same results I think.

You mean Nash will still get his panties in a bunch? Surely removing the gun will at least make Beetle happy anyway.

Dago · « **Reply #69 on:** April 08, 2006, 10:19:39 AM »

I am loving this thread, nash shows again just what he is, and many are becoming aware of who and what he is. Thanks nash.

Additionally, we have a woman assaulting alcoholic weighing in and people here have long ago figured him out and learned to ignore him.

Life is so good at times like this.

Shuckins · « **Reply #70 on:** April 08, 2006, 10:31:51 AM »

I'm confused again.

Didn't we come to the conclusion in another thread that we "do not have a right to not be offended?"

john9001 · « **Reply #71 on:** April 08, 2006, 11:56:50 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by ChickenHawk
It's a dumb joke that has no basis in reality. Faced with a life and death situation, party affiliation has no bearing and animal instinct takes over. Any man, dem, rep, socialist, communist, fascist, peasant, cast member, whatever, would fight to the death to save his family.

not true, people have testified that even when faced with certain death they would not fight back. They have said that they could not kill even to save their own life.

midnight Target · « **Reply #72 on:** April 08, 2006, 12:02:33 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by john9001
not true, people have testified that even when faced with certain death they would not fight back. They have said that they could not kill even to save their own life.

Just about the only person I can attribute that kind of behavior to would be that guy who said he would "Turn the other cheek" or something like that.

Captain Virgil Hilts · « **Reply #73 on:** April 08, 2006, 01:36:17 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by midnight Target
Just about the only person I can attribute that kind of behavior to would be that guy who said he would "Turn the other cheek" or something like that.

He also said something about if you didn't have a sword to go sell your cloak and buy a sword. He never expected anyone but himself to suffer the way he did without fighting back.

Dago · « **Reply #74 on:** April 08, 2006, 02:00:40 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by john9001
not true, people have testified that even when faced with certain death they would not fight back. They have said that they could not kill even to save their own life.

An awful lot of Jews walked like sheep to the slaughter without resisting, knowing they were about to die during WW2 in concentration camps. Read the story of Babi Yar, and so many others where there was no resistance. Granted, resisting would have been futile, and this isn't the same as someone given the chance of defending themselves or not in a fair situation, but history and our current society is full of examples of people not resisting. Luckily, there are more stories of those who had the will, strenght and determination to fight back, even in the knowledge that they would die, but at least die fighting.