Author Topic: Th course of British Society in the future  (Read 4676 times)

Offline lazs2

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24886
Th course of British Society in the future
« Reply #75 on: June 18, 2007, 02:25:55 PM »
if you have pride and patriotism for queen and country.. isn't that a class system?   I guess we view royalty differently.

We are/were  the greatest nation with the best manners and values including modesty?

When england was the most powerful on earth it could also be said that it was amoung the worlds most predjudiced and cruel and tyrannical.    

I do know what you mean tho about language and culture and those sorts of things...

We are facing these things in a much worse way than you are... You simply can't have tradition with multiculturalism... multiculturalism will kill any successful country.

lazs

Offline Whisky58

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 289
Th course of British Society in the future
« Reply #76 on: June 18, 2007, 06:19:20 PM »
Laurie, Britain is full of character & charisma.  Look around - science, literature, art, music, sport - we've got some of the best. The strongest economy in Europe.  Where else would you want to live - France? Germany? Italy? Newspapers make us look crap, but that sells copy - same in any country unless the press is state owned.

What about pride & patriotism for president & country. A class thing?  Don't be stupid Whisky - we vote for our president.  Ok but how many black, hispanic, working class or asian presidents have there been.  At least we have had women heads of state (and a woman prime minister).  We're not proud of the Queen because she represents aristocracy but she represents the state. Since the 17th century the monarch's role has changed - the Queen serves the people, not visa-versa. The monarchy is permanent -  a bit like the stars & stripes I guess.  Queen and country are the same thing.
Britain has enjoyed 2000 years of multiculturalism.  Ethnic & racial diversity strengthens - especially when the immigrants are the ones with the guts & wherewithall to get away from whatever 3rd world country. We have 4000 years of traditions going back to Stonehenge.  Our history proves that multiculturism and traditions are not mutually exclusive.  Which other country has been as consistently successful as Britain over the last 1000 years?

BTW Laurie Great Britain refers to "greater" Britain ie including Northern Ireland & all the islands dotted around the coast rather than "great" as in fantastic or superb. I'm sure you know that & I'm making a dick of myself but worth clarifying for non-Brits.
:)
Regards
Whisky

Offline Holden McGroin

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8591
Th course of British Society in the future
« Reply #77 on: June 18, 2007, 09:21:27 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Whisky58
Queen and country are the same thing.


I wouldn't agree with that...

I'd plant seed in the country....
Holden McGroin LLC makes every effort to provide accurate and complete information. Since humor, irony, and keen insight may be foreign to some readers, no warranty, expressed or implied is offered. Re-writing this disclaimer cost me big bucks at the lawyer’s office!

Offline Laurie

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 753
Th course of British Society in the future
« Reply #78 on: June 20, 2007, 03:17:39 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by lazs2


We are facing these things in a much worse way than you are... You simply can't have tradition with multiculturalism... multiculturalism will kill any successful country.

lazs


So Why is it so popular?

Offline Laurie

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 753
Th course of British Society in the future
« Reply #79 on: June 20, 2007, 03:18:25 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Whisky58
Laurie, Britain is full of character & charisma.  Look around - science, literature, art, music, sport - we've got some of the best. The strongest economy in Europe.  Where else would you want to live - France? Germany? Italy? Newspapers make us look crap, but that sells copy - same in any country unless the press is state owned.

Regards


I would Consider the Isle of man and The Falklands.

Offline Hazzer

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 290
      • Fleetwood town F.C. Cod Army
Th course of British Society in the future
« Reply #80 on: June 20, 2007, 04:27:56 AM »
I think your wrong Laurie,I love this country,and I'm proud to live here but what you've been saying is dangerous and ultimatley leads to mass paranoia, and ppl getting hurt.Parties like  the BNP love ppl like you.


   As for some Golden age when was this,We all think of Churchill as fighting for democracy and freedom,well he was,but he was also fighting for -and it's in all his speeches the "Empire"-their was NO Democracey in the British Empire.Roosevelt new it and the Americans rightly made sure we dismantled   it after WWII.The Price of victory.



  A lot of ppl in are Empire fought for Britain during WWII,Indians,Africans nepalese jamaicans some of the ppl you attack now,are descendants of these ppl.

I suppose they thought after fighting for the Empire they would be welcomed with open arms.How wrong they were!!

    How different the Brttanicus Pax was to the Romanus Pax.The Romans once their colonials excepted the Roman way were welcomed into the Empire some of them became ceaser.

 

   

 Finally I live in a low rent area of town,my asian niebours are by and large well mannered law abiding hard working ppl who I say  hi to in the street,most of the trouble is caused by my white niegbours.
"I murmured that I had no Shoes,till I met a man that had no Feet."

Offline Laurie

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 753
Th course of British Society in the future
« Reply #81 on: June 20, 2007, 08:11:06 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Hazzer


   As for some Golden age when was this,We all think of Churchill as fighting for democracy and freedom,well he was,but he was also fighting for -and it's in all his speeches the "Empire"-their was NO Democracey in the British Empire.Roosevelt new it and the Americans rightly made sure we dismantled   it after WWII.The Price of victory.



  A lot of ppl in are Empire fought for Britain during WWII,Indians,Africans nepalese jamaicans some of the ppl you attack now,are descendants of these ppl.

I suppose they thought after fighting for the Empire they would be welcomed with open arms.How wrong they were!!

   
 

   

 


With your two points in the quote i must argue.

Roosevelt was not a very wise man, he was over- optimistic and lacked respect for Churchill, who's jusgement through WW2 was exceeded by no-one else.

It's a shame Roosevelt and 'his americans' didnt dismantle the Soveit union aswell.
Roosevelt Had double standards when it came to Churchill/Britain and Stalin/Russia. and for this i take much of what he said and thought with a pinch of salt to be frank.

And as for your second piont in the quote, you have tailored my arguement to fit your needs,(like many liberals). I'm sorry but i dont remember Eatsern Europeans or many Africans(except some parts of northern africa and kenya) Fighting for Britain or even bieng part of the empire!

If you look at ex british colonies they have done extremely well compared to those of France, italy, austria, germany or Russia.

America
Canada
India
Australia
Kenya
South Africa
New Zealand

Britain did great things for these countries that you claim it tyranically controlled.

I pinch this phrase from someone you may know,

'A dog isn't made a horse if  it's born in a stable'

And just for the record, i am not in favour of the BNP.

Offline lazs2

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24886
Th course of British Society in the future
« Reply #82 on: June 20, 2007, 08:43:16 AM »
laurie..  only the left pushes multiculturalism..  It is not popular with people... it shoved down their throats.   The idea is to destroy any remaining sense of country so that socialism can thrive.

I would take exception with you on the british colonies... they thrived after they had gotten the british boot off of their throat.   Being a colony under british rule was a horrible thing.   We fought a bloody revolution to get that boot off our throat.

You are right about FDR being a terrible president tho.. for other reasons tho.. he brought the US closer to socialism and did the most to destroy the constitution...  LBJ later did almost as much.

lazs

Offline Angus

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10057
Th course of British Society in the future
« Reply #83 on: June 20, 2007, 09:30:48 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Whisky58
Laurie, Britain is full of character & charisma.  Look around - science, literature, art, music, sport - we've got some of the best. The strongest economy in Europe.  Where else would you want to live - France? Germany? Italy? Newspapers make us look crap, but that sells copy - same in any country unless the press is state owned.

What about pride & patriotism for president & country. A class thing?  Don't be stupid Whisky - we vote for our president.  Ok but how many black, hispanic, working class or asian presidents have there been.  At least we have had women heads of state (and a woman prime minister).  We're not proud of the Queen because she represents aristocracy but she represents the state. Since the 17th century the monarch's role has changed - the Queen serves the people, not visa-versa. The monarchy is permanent -  a bit like the stars & stripes I guess.  Queen and country are the same thing.
Britain has enjoyed 2000 years of multiculturalism.  Ethnic & racial diversity strengthens - especially when the immigrants are the ones with the guts & wherewithall to get away from whatever 3rd world country. We have 4000 years of traditions going back to Stonehenge.  Our history proves that multiculturism and traditions are not mutually exclusive.  Which other country has been as consistently successful as Britain over the last 1000 years?

BTW Laurie Great Britain refers to "greater" Britain ie including Northern Ireland & all the islands dotted around the coast rather than "great" as in fantastic or superb. I'm sure you know that & I'm making a dick of myself but worth clarifying for non-Brits.
:)
Regards



Now I must say, that this was quite good, Whisky :aok
It was very interesting to carry out the flight trials at Rechlin with the Spitfire and the Hurricane. Both types are very simple to fly compared to our aircraft, and childishly easy to take-off and land. (Werner Mölders)

Offline Hazzer

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 290
      • Fleetwood town F.C. Cod Army
Th course of British Society in the future
« Reply #84 on: June 20, 2007, 09:35:59 AM »
I don't think Laurie..I know!!the British Empire was a tyranny fact!!I suggest you read some History.A benign tyranny if you like ,but wrong however you look at it.

   As far as eastern europeans are concerned they are now part of the EU,that means the  free movement of goods and ppl between borders,many brits take advantge of this by moving to spain or france, and now Eastern Europe too.Presumably in "Laurie world" they should all be deported back to Britain?

  it is also good for growth in business,to have economic growth you need a corrosponding increase in workers,particularley in jobs that we prefer not to do,that is why a laissei fare tory Government will struggle to keep ppl like you and it's Base of business types happy.

  The torys want them here,but like you they would prefer they spoke perfect English and were white.

   :aok
"I murmured that I had no Shoes,till I met a man that had no Feet."

Offline Curval

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11572
      • http://n/a
Th course of British Society in the future
« Reply #85 on: June 20, 2007, 09:43:50 AM »
I live in a British colony right now.  I don't feel any boots on my throat at all.  Lazs is right that the British Empire was tyrannical and brutal back "in the day", but so was every single country back then, including the United States....just ask any native Indian.
Some will fall in love with life and drink it from a fountain that is pouring like an avalanche coming down the mountain

Offline Laurie

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 753
Th course of British Society in the future
« Reply #86 on: June 20, 2007, 09:51:25 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Hazzer
I don't think Laurie..I know!!the British Empire was a tyranny fact!!I suggest you read some History.A benign tyranny if you like ,but wrong however you look at it.

   As far as eastern europeans are concerned they are now part of the EU,that means the  free movement of goods and ppl between borders,many brits take advantge of this by moving to spain or france, and now Eastern Europe too.Presumably in "Laurie world" they should all be deported back to Britain?

  it is also good for growth in business,to have economic growth you need a corrosponding increase in workers,particularley in jobs that we prefer not to do,that is why a laissei fare tory Government will struggle to keep ppl like you and it's Base of business types happy.

  The torys want them here,but like you they would prefer they spoke perfect English and were white.

   :aok

So you admit that British ex-colonies came off better than those of other empires?

You think Britain was the ONLY tyrannical empire? And if we were so bad , why did they hail Queen Victoria like a goddess in India?


And places like turkey technically aren't in Europe. shame you totally skimmed past the Churchill point though, not convenient for you? He was the greatest British politician and leader ever known.  If you don't like Churchill, how about a return of Thatcher-ism.

Hazzer theres good immigrants and there's sponges of society. Good immigrants come here keen to learn and adapt to British life and to work hard and improve our nation, bad ones come here, with their 6 kids on a little dingy or under trucks, marry and English male/female, doss around with petty jobs until they get citizenship( which is handed out like a raffle ticket) then sit on their tulips and rape the benefit system ;which is out of control to be frank.

for Christ's sake 'Tony and Gordon'& co. Don't even know how many people are really in this frigging country, we must learn lessons from our American brothers when it comes to border control. All Blair has done is blown away all the deals Thatcher secured us in Europe and given in to France + Germany; the dictators within Europe, leaving us putting EVEN MORE money into Europe and getting less money back, but of course more immigrants to look after from the countries we are paying to run.

I would pay to take Britain out of the EU any day of the year. You might say we'll loose trade, but we wouldn't., We'd just loose a load of legal and constitutional baggage. There are over 60 million people in the UK, NO country in the EU would stop training with us and exporting/importing with us, we have one of the, if not the largest population in Europe, were just a trading post too good to miss.

I would love to see what the return of national service and an immigration policy like the french would do for Britain, a bloody good job. hazzer, what you seem to call 'Laurie world' is the real world my friend, where not everyone is looking out for everyone else and the rose shades are off.
You seem to be in the 'lets hold hands and sing kumbaya' frame of mind.

Patriotism is not simply supporting England in the world cup.
« Last Edit: June 20, 2007, 10:08:51 AM by Laurie »

Offline Laurie

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 753
Th course of British Society in the future
« Reply #87 on: June 20, 2007, 10:02:05 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Hazzer


  The torys want them here,but like you they would prefer they spoke perfect English and were white.

   :aok


Classic non-right act, if you cant win an arguement with reason, resort to  'tories' this and 'tories' that.

Offline Laurie

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 753
Th course of British Society in the future
« Reply #88 on: June 20, 2007, 10:10:22 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by lazs2
laurie..  only the left pushes multiculturalism..  It is not popular with people... it shoved down their throats.   The idea is to destroy any remaining sense of country so that socialism can thrive.

I


It seems to be running right through hazzer's blood though.;)

Offline Dowding

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6867
      • http://www.psys07629.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/272/index.html
Th course of British Society in the future
« Reply #89 on: June 20, 2007, 10:42:18 AM »
Quote
Lazs is right that the British Empire was tyrannical and brutal back "in the day", but so was every single country back then, including the United States....just ask any native Indian.


Let's look at the slave trade. As we can all agree, the British Empire was brutal and tyrannical so we can make allowances for its involvement.

What excuse does the noble, great and just U.S.A. have?
War! Never been so much fun. War! Never been so much fun! Go to your brother, Kill him with your gun, Leave him lying in his uniform, Dying in the sun.