Originally posted by Toad
I make VERY MUCH out of these United States going to war without a legitimate cause under "just war theory".
Why?
I mean what is more important...
going to war for the right reasons (WWI, WWII, Kuweit, Iraq)
or going to war for the wrong (but legal) reasons (Vietnam)
or going to war for the right reasons even though it is illegal (Kosovo)
You should not be looking at any sort of legality aspect here. Simply because international law is not really a law at all.
Trust me on what I'm about to say next.
International law = PoliticsYou will never find any answers there. You will not find the answer to the question "what is right" or "what is wrong", you wont find any clear cut rules saying what is ok and what is not...and if you do, those rules can be, and are constantly, bent, twisted, broken or "overlooked".
I can argue either side of any conflict, and I can find good valid arguments for "my" side...arguments good enough to get idealists and hippies out in the streets demonstrating for my cause...But at the end of the day it doesnt really matter because international law is only about politics.
Want to break a UN resolution? Go right ahead if you are a powerful nation or if you have powerful friends (US, Russia, Israel)
Want to enforce a UN resolution? Go right ahead if you are a powerful nation or if you have powerful friends.
Want to break a UN resolution and you dont have any powerful friends but a couple of powerful enemies...well then your toejam outta luck (Iraq)
Want to have another nation follow a UN resolution but you dont have any powerful friends...shit outta luck again (Nicaragua, "Palestinians")