Author Topic: Question to Finns  (Read 29224 times)

Offline Fishu

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3789
Question to Finns
« Reply #795 on: March 27, 2005, 03:08:26 PM »
You guys sure do have lots of explonations for many things, conveniently to always make it look better for your cause.
I'm yet to see something taken granted without such convenient explonations.

I guess we can safely conclude that the communism is the best thing to happen for the world...
May god help the brainwashed capitalist fools who might think otherwise (and the delusional poles who didn't prefer communism).
« Last Edit: March 27, 2005, 03:12:07 PM by Fishu »

Offline Thrawn

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6972
Question to Finns
« Reply #796 on: March 27, 2005, 03:15:13 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Raven_2
to Thrawn

>>So many geniuses in the USSR, but it took you decades to realise that communism is an inefficiant economic model.

Well, maybe in a few decades you realize, that *communism* it`s not an economic model at all? It`s like call "monarchy" an economic model.


You are confusing politics (the allocation of power) with economics (the allocation of scarce resource).

The CCCPs form of allocation of power was democratic, while in the west it was pluralistically democratic.


Quote
So - China are still commie. And they have 40% of USA 9.000 billions external debt. Think about it. It`s about economic efficiency of liberal democracy and communism form of organizing society :-)


The irony of this is that the US is in this position because of non-elected state officials controlling the issue of currency.  Hardly liberally democratic or capitalist.  They are in this position because they are moving away from the traditional institutions that made them great in the first place.

But this has nothing to do with the failure of the CCCP, except that they should have learned the lessons of it's fall.


Quote
And this guy call commies stupid :-)


No, I called them geniuses and I wasn't being sarcastic.  The CCCP has produced some of the most brilliant minds in history and have made some great technological achievements.  We do know who Yuri Gagarin is.  ;)


Quote
Sure. And thats why they still trade with us. If we block gas transporting to them, they die out. Why we tolerate to their bla-bla, then? Well, while they pay with EU money for our gas, we can ignore that.


Who would blocking the oil hurt, Russia or the EU?  Both, it's mutually beneficial.  But that doesn't account for all the other ex-CCCP states begging to join the EU.  Why is East Germany so poor compared to West Germany?  You would think that after the workers paradise that was East Germany they would have a much higher standard of living.
« Last Edit: March 27, 2005, 03:28:31 PM by Thrawn »

Offline Raven_2

  • Parolee
  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 247
Question to Finns
« Reply #797 on: March 27, 2005, 03:16:53 PM »
to bik

>>Anyway, as i said, problem is that people here are trying to be honest with the history while you guys are denaying the facts.

Bik, there is west variant of history and east one :-) Truth in the middle, as always. And there a lot of propaganda in each variant. With open of curtain we try to make compromise. It`s not easy, you know. So, don`t blame us for denying facts - cause from our point of view it`s you, who deny facts, written in history books :-)

Offline bikekil

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2038
Question to Finns
« Reply #798 on: March 27, 2005, 03:16:56 PM »
Raven,
There is a huge difference. We never sign any "alliance" packt with Germans, especially saying that we will both attack Czechs at the same time and then will share the land.

That's what Soviets did with Germans. How can you call it non agression pact. Of course, maybe the official non agression part was a major thing, but other than that Soviets and Germans signed the pack that was a 4th partition of Poland and according to which your armies attacked and shared Poland. How can not call it an Allience and how can you not see the differenca between PL-CZ case as we had no pact made with Gemrnas about the invasion on Czechs...

Raven, i just can't believe that you can denay such a clear thing. How it's possible?

Offline NUKE

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8599
      • Arizona Greens
Question to Finns
« Reply #799 on: March 27, 2005, 03:17:58 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by bikekil
Raven,

Nazi Germany attacked poland on 1.09.1939. While Polish Army were still defending against the Germans Soviets attacked Poland on 17.09.1939
It thing that it's a fact that both armies attacked Poland at once.

It's insane to call Poland and Gemrnany and Allies so i won't comment that one more.



I guess you've never read Boroda's history books. They contain  the truth regarding all matters. The rest of the entire world is brainwashed and was denied the truth.

Offline genozaur

  • Parolee
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 562
Question to Finns
« Reply #800 on: March 27, 2005, 03:21:52 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Holden McGroin
Genozaur, the Russians suffered so badly in WW2 because Stalin purged the military of anyone who Josef figured was a personal threat.  There was no leadership in the army, because they were all dead or in Siberian work camps.

The economy of the Soviet Union was a mess, because Stalin and the central committee followed the stupid policy of central control of the economy.  So the economic engine that wins wars was not in existance in the USSR.

As some of my ancestry is Pima Indian, I can easily say genocidal foreign invaders took over my country.

My previous observation seems to be gaining strength.


Holden, I am really sorry for counting you as an unexperienced American civilian.
As it appeares, from the southern Siberia my ancestors went westward whereas yours went eastward. This is our biggest difference ,I guess.
Besides some minor political disgreements.

The purges among the Soviet military did not affect the exact number of military airplanes stationed on each of the Soviet military airfields. It was the "peaceful"German recon planes kindly "escorted from the Soviet airspace" before the war that did the bulk of the teamwork with the German dive bombers that bombed the Soviet Air Force into oblivion during the first hours of operation "Barbarossa" (the Nazi Germany invasion of the USSR).
The Soviet Air Force plaines were destroyed on their own airfields by the pointed air strikes of the German dive bombers. For two years after that the Luftwaffe pilots were hunting down the Soviet ground troops and enjoying the total air superiority. "The Hoering Eagles" were not only chasing separate trucks carrying the troops but they even practised by chasing and killing the lone Soviet soldiers and civilians.
My late father, a six year old boy at the time, was forced to play 'cat-and-mouse' around a huge stack of straw, hiding from the attacking Luftwaffe plane which made several passes with the purpose of hitting "a moving ground target."  

And where did you learn that the Soviet industry "was a mess" before the WWII ?
This is a really rediculous statement. And it is totally wrong. You better think for yourself than read the BS from Cold War times' propaganda.
Let me quote the fresh opinion on Soviet industry. The following is from the pp.112-113 of 'Atlas of World War II' by David Jordan and Andrew Wiest, published in 2004 in New York by Barnes & Noble
Quote
:
SOVIET INDUSTRY. The sheer scale of Soviet war industry is difficult to imagine. ... Within six months [after the start of the war in June 1941] 1532 [one thousand five hundred thirty two] factories had been dismantled and shipped east to their new locations [including 226 to Caucasus, 667 to Urals, 308 to Central Asia, 322 to Siberia]. By mid-1942, only about 300 [three hundred] of these plants had not restarted production.
... Soviet industry produced 238,000,000 [two
hundred thirty eight million] tons of munitions in 1942, in comparison with 63,000,000 [sixty three million] tons in 1940 - and this despite the disruption created when the factories were moved. Between 1943 and 1945, the Soviet Union produced more than 80,000 [eighty thousand] aircraft, 73,000 [seventy three thousand] armoured vehicles {this means tanks and self-propelled armoured artillery - G.S.} and 324,000 [three hundred twenty four thousand] artillery pieces. Factories such as that at Cheliabinsk {in southern Urals - G.S.} were colossal - the plant had no fewer than 64 [sixty four] assembly lines.
  There were some deficiencies in this mammoth effort - over two thirds of motor transport in Soviet service in 1945 came from the Western Allies. Britain and America also supplied a considerable number of aircraft and other items. However, even this contribution was dwarfed by indigenous production : 14,795 [fourteen thousand seven hundred ninety five] aircraft reached the Soviet Union from the United States during the war, a figure representing about four months' Soviet aircraft production." [END OF QUOTE FROM PAGE 113]
[QUOTE FROM PAGES 112-113] :
THE DISPERSAL OF SOVIET INDUSTRY.
One of Stalin's major achievements [sic!-G.S.] as Soviet leader was to drive forward the mass industrialization of his country, although this success [it's a quote from the American book, not the Soviet propaganda - G.S.] was forever tarnished by the vast human cost that was paid to achieve this.
  Communist leaders were well aware that one of the primary causes of Russia's failure in World War I had been a lack of industry to provide the war material necessary to fight a modern conflict. [The latter not fully correct because the stockpiles of munitions produced by the Russian industry during the World War I
were enough to supply the Red and White armies for three years of the devastating Civil War of 1917-1920 and even in 1941 during the defence of Sevastopol - G.S.] ...
  The programme of industrialization was immense and carefully thought out. Huge industrial complexes were established deep in the Soviet interior. The much-heralded city of Magnitogorsk ... chosen for a new industrial city ... had a mere 25 [twenty five !] inhabitants ... in 1928; four years later ... 250,000 people ....
Much of the Soviet Union's basic heavy industry was set up far to the east of the Urals [that's besides 1532 factories moved to the east when the war started ! - G.S.], in Siberia or Central Asia, which had the advantage of placing it well beyond the range of German air attack once the war started."
Light industry was a different matter, however, and a great deal of this sector was well within reach of an invading army." [END OF QUOTE]

Offline Raven_2

  • Parolee
  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 247
Question to Finns
« Reply #801 on: March 27, 2005, 03:22:24 PM »
to Fishu

>>I guess we can safely conclude that the communism is the best thing to happen for the world...

Communism never happened. Socialism (what we had in later Brezhnev USSR) come close, thought. Any soviet can say to you, that Brezhnev time wasn`t so bad. And, yes, communism and anarchism is the best form of organizing society. Well, on the paper, cause no one see them in practice :-)

>>May god help the brainwashed capitalist fools who might think otherwise

Words of russian officer into intervue to australian journalists during Berlin occupation:
Quote

We are pledged to destroy Fascism. German fascism is no worse than any other Fascism. The only country in the world which recognises and destroys Fascism in any disguise is Russia – but it is not a matter of nationality, you know. Nationality is not important to us. We did not hare Germans – or Italians or Chinese or Negroes. Oh no. We do not think Russians are better than other people, except perhaps that Russians have a system which seeks to destroy Fascism. We will make Russia strong and secure – not to impose our will on other peoples but to defend men against Fascism wherever it shows itself. Russia must first be made strong and secure. That is a good sense. That is logic. We have nothing against capitalist democracy, except perhaps that it turns Fascist so easily when something goes wrong with the machinery


>>We have nothing against capitalist democracy, except perhaps that it turns Fascist so easily when something goes wrong with the machinery

Offline genozaur

  • Parolee
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 562
Question to Finns
« Reply #802 on: March 27, 2005, 03:26:02 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Holden McGroin
The following is not meant as a personal attack, but just a observation of behavioral phenomenon.

You're an idiot, genozaur.


You wish. :rofl :D :rolleyes:

Offline bikekil

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2038
Question to Finns
« Reply #803 on: March 27, 2005, 03:30:23 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Raven_2
to bik

>>Anyway, as i said, problem is that people here are trying to be honest with the history while you guys are denaying the facts.

Bik, there is west variant of history and east one :-) Truth in the middle, as always. And there a lot of propaganda in each variant. With open of curtain we try to make compromise. It`s not easy, you know. So, don`t blame us for denying facts - cause from our point of view it`s you, who deny facts, written in history books :-)


Raven, so there is a hope :) But some things are so clear... like that Allience...

look, is i have a two neighbours and will go to one, agree that we will "invade" tha third one, then i will f**k his daughter while my comarade will f**k his wife, we are not acting together? We are not the "allies"...
I was trying to give you not political example that is representing a similar thing, so the word "allies" don't match perfactly here, but the picture is clear.. and there is no room for a propaganda here. that are the facts.

And what about your MFA statement?

Raven, i'm sure we could use a lot of facts that are in your books and are not in ours but would you in exchange admit some other things?

as for truth - it's most likely in the middle, but the facts are exactly where they are - that's why they are facts. As we can discuss many things, we can analyze it and we can cane up with an agreements that would most likely by in the middle, the facts are the facts. Pilsudksi likker your POW's - that's the fact. Stalin killed our POW's - that's the fact, there sin no MIDDLE here... just something that happend and we can accelt or denay.

Offline genozaur

  • Parolee
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 562
Question to Finns
« Reply #804 on: March 27, 2005, 03:34:17 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by straffo
So the pole were wrong to grab 1000km2 when the Russian were right to grab half or Poland.

You're not dense ... I've trouble finding the right word ...


Straf, read a passage on 'Curson Line', a historical (political and ethnic) border line between Russia and Poland, and shut up.
:D
Even Wikipedia with its "subtle" statistical twists will do for you.
:rofl

Offline bikekil

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2038
Question to Finns
« Reply #805 on: March 27, 2005, 03:35:55 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by genozaur
Straf, read a passage on 'Curson Line', a historical (political and ethnic) border line between Russia and Poland, and shut up.
:D
Even Wikipedia with its "subtle" statistical twists will do for you.
:rofl


yeah, you liberated the world and had a right to do so :rofl

Offline Raven_2

  • Parolee
  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 247
Question to Finns
« Reply #806 on: March 27, 2005, 03:36:17 PM »
to Thrawn

>>You are confusing politics (the allocation of power) with economics (the allocation of scarce resource).

Still don`t understand? Communism it`s a form of democracy. Like liberal democracy, parlamental democracy and so on. This word has nothing to do with economic models (planned economy, in our case). Sure, ideologicaly, pure communism cannot coexist with market. But pure communism never exist.

Communism has nothing to do with soviet economic model, cause communism is

>>Why is East Germany so poor compared to West Germany?

Well, statistically, East Germany was poor comparing to West side long before WW2. Didn`t you blame England for poorness in India, yes? This not caused by british occupation, I suppose. It`s because of lack of resources, unlucky geographical point and so on.

Offline straffo

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10029
Question to Finns
« Reply #807 on: March 27, 2005, 03:44:16 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Raven_2
to straffo

>>You needed 1 full year to come defend your ally and it's with the help of the Nazi ?

CZ officialy reject USSR help in 1938. But, still, they were allies and this can be count like motivation to attack Poland :-)

My sayings about attack on Poland because of CZ is kind of joke. I said this cause Holden claim that if USSR and nazi attack Poland at once - they were allies. In this way nazi and Poland can be called allies too, cause both of them attack CZ.


Allright then , I thought you were serious.

I'm sorry to have been harsh

Offline Thrawn

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6972
Question to Finns
« Reply #808 on: March 27, 2005, 03:52:40 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Raven_2
to Thrawn

>>You are confusing politics (the allocation of power) with economics (the allocation of scarce resource).

Still don`t understand? Communism it`s a form of democracy. Like liberal democracy, parlamental democracy and so on. This word has nothing to do with economic models (planned economy, in our case).


In the CCCP who owned the scarce resources?  Individuals and/or corporations of individuals or the state?  



Quote
>>Why is East Germany so poor compared to West Germany?


Well, statistically, East Germany was poor comparing to West side long before WW2. Didn`t you blame England for poorness in India, yes? This not caused by british occupation, I suppose. It`s because of lack of resources, unlucky geographical point and so on.


I don't recall making such a claim about India.  Lets take if for granted that East Germany is poorer than West because of lack of resources.  How can you explain that the rest of the CCCP is so much poorer than western countries.  

The way I exlain is because of communist (or planned if you prefer) economic system.  Anytime a government misallocates resources where they think they should go, instead of were there is an actually market demand and you destroy competition damage is done to the economy and to the standard of living of the populous.

Offline straffo

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10029
Question to Finns
« Reply #809 on: March 27, 2005, 03:52:46 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by genozaur
Straf, read a passage on 'Curson Line', a historical (political and ethnic) border line between Russia and Poland, and shut up.
:D
Even Wikipedia with its "subtle" statistical twists will do for you.
:rofl


The Curzon line was and is a complete joke.
And If this line is ethnic I'm the next queen of England.

It's just a very practical justification of the deportation of  Polish-speaking people of this area.

Talking about stats :

Poles                          4,794,000  39.9%
Ukrainians and Ruthenians      4,139,000  34.4%
Jews                           1,045,000  08.4%
Belarusians                      993,000  08.5%
Russians                         120,000  01.0%
Lithuanians                       76,000  00.6%
Others and not given             845,000  06.4%