Hazed, let me lay it out for you. What funkedup is refering to in the squeeky wheel, is not that the items you disagree with in the game are the squeeky wheels, wrather that YOU are a squeeky wheel. The resone why are simple statements like this.
"The cooling times question i asked I tried my damndest to understand your explanation but I still dont have a clear indication of the reasons for the differing times in AH."
On that issue I answered you twice. Yet here we are at least a month later and you are once again squeeking about it.
We try look into any VALID discussion of flight modling that could be incorect, and have responded to some like the rocket pod jetison before.
That question is a choice on our part to make them not jetisonable, because all players would just jetison after use, and that is not how they were used. The jetison was for emergancy only, and not disposable. There for in an effort to be more realistic we chose not to have them jetisonable. And now once again just this statment will lead to another heated argument.
So now who is it that is causing the "TONE" of this type of statements?
"As i see it the whole tone of some of the threads is detrimental to AH as they often hint at HTC ignoring or avoiding the issues brought forward."
HTC by not spending the time holding the hands ,and giving a few squeeky players extra atention?
Or the "SQUEEKY" players who tend to only bring up items that would make there beloved planes better?
I'm not positive about this, but where in the last year have you posted an item where any LW plane is to good at somthing?
And if you realy belive that me answereing your first question would make an issue stop, I belive you are greatly mistaken.
The out come would be one of a few.
If I said yes, we are looking into it. Then we decided it's ok. You would come right back at us and argue some more that it's NOT ok.
If I said we have looked into it, and it's OK you would then bring the topic back up again in 2 weeks. Or just go away stomping your feet claming we don't care about accuracy.
A lot of the time the best way for us answere this stuff, is to not respond until we are positive we are going to change somthing.
Even then it can work out better if we just change it, and put it in the readme at release.
There was a post a few days back how incorect or ar234 was because it had a skid not wheels, should I imeaditly respond that we will look into it. Or that no you are mistaken, take time diging up the resources on which version had what to get into that discusion?
Please realize that when you belive that somthing is incorect the burden of proof lies with you, it is not our job to prove what we have is correct. The resone is simple, how many times and to many people would have to keep proving it.
HiTech
